Hynobius tagoi Dunn, 1923
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5339.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6882297C-7C5B-428C-AABF-F671E0440674 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8314855 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E8340D79-0E1D-5759-32E1-6DA5FBE6F816 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hynobius tagoi Dunn, 1923 |
status |
|
Hynobius tagoi Dunn, 1923 View in CoL
(Japanese name: Tago-sanshou-uwo)
(English name: Tago’s salamander)
( Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 , 9B View FIGURE 9 , 13B View FIGURE 13 , 16 View FIGURE 16 , 17D–F View FIGURE 17 , 19 View FIGURE 19 )
Hynobius nebulosus (part): Stejneger 1907, 31
Hynobius nebulosus (part): Matsui et al. 2019, 36
Hynobius tsuensis (part): Oyama 1930, 31
Hynobius tsuensis (part, Group B): Niwa et al. 2021, 260, Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3
Hynobius tagoi: Dunn 1923a View in CoL , 29
Hynobius leechii tagoi: Mori 1928 View in CoL , 48
Holotype: CAS 26563 About CAS , an adult male from Tsushima, North Island , collected by Victor Kuhne in October 1910.
Specimens referred in the present paper: All specimens from Tsushima Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture: KUHE 58710 View Materials and 59933 (two females) from Sumo, Mitsushima ; KUHE 59949–59952 View Materials (four males) and 59953 (one female) from Itose, Toyotama ; KUHE 58864–58865 View Materials (two males) from Otsuna, Toyotama ; KUHE 58996 View Materials (one female) from Yoshida, Mine ; KUHE 57664–57665 View Materials , 57689–57690 View Materials (four males), 57666, 60171, and 60180 (three females) from Mine, Mine ; KUHE 59937 View Materials (one female) from Kaidokoro, Kamiagata ; KUHE 58673 View Materials (one female) from Oshika, Kamitsushima ; KUHE 58701–58703 View Materials , 58871 View Materials , 58983 View Materials , 60550–60562 View Materials (18 males), 58704–58705, and 58872 (three females) from Kin, Kamitsushima ; KUHE 58709 View Materials (one female) from Hamakusu , Kamitsushima. All specimens were collected by K. Niwa in 2016–2018 .
Etymology: The specific name “ tagoi ” is dedicated to Katsuya Tago who made great contributions to zoology of Japan.
Diagnosis: A large species (adult SVL 59.6–71.3 mm in males and 56.4–70.2 mm in females), breeding in lotic water; dorsum brown with numerous dark stipples; fore- hindlimbs medium; tips of fore- and hindlimbs adpressed on body never meeting (overlap of -3.0 to -0.5 costal folds in males and -3.5 to - 0.5 in females); fifth toe long; tail long, low, and narrow; usually distinct yellow stripe(s) absent on the upper side of tail in males, but present in females; usually without distinct yellow stripe(s) on the lower side of tail; lateral color of tail brown with numerous dark stippling; ova large; clutch size small; egg-sacs short and C-shaped (crescent) with distinct whiptail structure on the free end. Phylogenetically, H. tagoi is included within the mtDNA clade of H. nebulosus , but H. tagoi has larger body size (SVL), relatively wider interorbital and upper eyelid, shorter axilla-groin distance, longer and lower tail, narrower tail at middle portion, longer fifth toe, and larger degree of limb overlap than H. nebulosus .
Color: In life, dorsum brown to brownish gray, with fine dark stippling ( Fig. 7A, C View FIGURE 7 ). Underside of body lighter than dorsum with ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ) or without spots ( Fig. 7B View FIGURE 7 ). Throat covered with white nuptial color in males. Tail side not black, but brown to brownish gray, with fine dark stippling (same color as dorsum) ( Fig. 7E, F View FIGURE 7 ). Middorsal line of tail slightly lighter: usually without distinct yellowish stripe in males ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ), but with narrow yellowish stripe in females ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ).
Variation: Morphometric data and body coloration data are summarized in Tables 3 View TABLE 3 and 5 View TABLE 5 , respectively. A significant sexual difference between males (n=28) and females (n=13) was not detected in body size (SVL) (P> 0.05), however, for ratio, males have significantly larger values (P <0.05) than females in snout length (SL, median=6.7%SVL in males vs. 6.4%SVL in females), tail length (TAL, 85.6%SVL vs. 76.4%SVL), basal tail width (BTAW, 10.6%SVL vs. 9.8%SVL), medial tail width (MTAW, 5.5%SVL vs. 4.6%SVL), basal tail height (BTAH, 8.3%SVL vs. 7.5%SVL), medial tail height (MTAH, 9.1%SVL vs. 8.3%SVL), maximum tail height (MXTAH, 9.7%SVL vs. 8.6%SVL), forelimb length (FLL, 23.3%SVL vs. 22.2%SVL), hindlimb length (HLL, 29.0%SVL vs. 27.8%SVL), and vomerine teeth series width (VTW, 5.0%SVL vs. 4.8%SVL). Whereas, males have significantly smaller axilla-groin distance (AGD, median=50.9%SVL) than females (52.9%SVL). Males have significantly larger degree of limb overlap (LO, median= -1.5) than females (-2.5). For body coloration, females tended to have distinct yellow stripe on the upper side of tail (76.9%) compared with males (25.0%).
Egg-sacs and eggs: Morphometric values of egg-sacs, clutch size, and unfertilized egg rate are shown in Table 4 View TABLE 4 . Egg-sacs of H. tagoi were crescent in shape with thin envelope with some wrinkles and no notable striations ( Figs. 13B View FIGURE 13 , 19B View FIGURE 19 ). The all egg-sacs (n=19) used in the present study had a distinct whiptail structure on the free end, like H. tsuensis and some lotic-breeding salamanders (e.g., H. oni and H. hirosei ). The whiptail structure of H. tagoi ranged 2.5–60 (median=15, n=19) mm in length, which was significantly longer than H. nebulosus but not significantly different from H. tsuensis ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ; Table 4 View TABLE 4 ). Egg-sacs of H. tagoi were significantly shorter than those of H. nebulosus ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ). Clutch size of H. tagoi ranged from 21–62 (mean±SD=45.5±11.4, n=23), which was smaller than those of relatives such as H. nebulosus (population from Fukue Island: range=111–266, mean±SD=175.9±46.9, n=9 [ Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ; Table 4 View TABLE 4 ]; Nagasaki: 77–160, 111.7±23.9, n=12 [ Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ; Table 4 View TABLE 4 ], 89–117, 101.7±14.2, n=3 [ Sato 1943]; all Kyushu: 41–333, 135.8±59.0, n=91 [ Matsui et al. 2019]), H. dunni (50–200, 95.1±27.5, n=55 [ Sato 1943]), and H. bakan sensu lato (56–333, 116.5±58.2, n=32 [ Matsui et al. 2019]), but not significantly differed from H. tsuensis (34–74, 52.8±10.8, n=8 [ Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ; Table 4 View TABLE 4 ]). Almost all eggs of H. tagoi were fertilized (unfertilized egg rate: median=2.0%, range=0.0–33.3%, n=24), unlike sympatric occurring H. tsuensis having many unfertilized eggs (unfertilized egg rate: 63.5%, 37.5–80.8%, n=14) in nature ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ; Table 4 View TABLE 4 ). Ova from two females ranged from 3.0–3.3 (mean±SD=3.2±0.11, n=10) and 3.3–3.5 (3.4±0.08, n=10) mm in diameter. The animal pole of egg was gray brown and vegetal pole was light in color.
Larvae: Views of larvae are shown in Figs. 17D–F View FIGURE 17 and 19C View FIGURE 19 . Larvae after hatching temporarily have a pair of balancers at the side of head. Fully grown larvae (n=7) at Stage 63 of Iwasawa and Yamashita (1991) of the first year collected from Kin, Kamitsushima on 23 June 2017 ranged from 17.6–28.7 (mean±SD=25.1±3.5) mm in SVL and 31.8–54.0 (47.5±7.3) mm in total length, head rounded in dorsal and lateral views ( Fig. 17D, E View FIGURE 17 ); snout short and broadly rounded; eyes slightly protruded, inset from edge of head in dorsal view; labial fold distinct at half of upper jaw; external gills developed; caudal fin higher than head; dorsal fin higher than ventral fin; origin of dorsal fin in the middle portion of trunk; origin of ventral fin in vent; tail tip weakly pointed; limbs slender; claws on fingers and toes absent. In life, dorsum light brown without spots ( Fig. 17D View FIGURE 17 ); venter whitish and transparent without spots ( Fig. 17F View FIGURE 17 ). Metamorphosing larvae (n=4) at Stage 65–67 of Iwasawa and Yamashita (1991) ranged from 28.2–30.8 (mean±SD=29.3±0.9) mm in SVL and 52.8–56.2 (54.6±1.5) in total length.
The larvae of H. tagoi tended to have larger body size than those of H. tsuensis ( Fig. 17A–C View FIGURE 17 ) (17.7–19.8 [mean±SD=18.4±0.7] mm in SVL and 30.7–35.7 [32.5±1.7] mm in total length, n=5, Stage 63) collected from the same locality (stream) at the same date. In body coloration, H. tagoi tended to do not have any blackish spots (markings) on lateral side of tail ( Fig. 17E View FIGURE 17 ), unlike larvae of H. tsuensis having large blackish or darkish markings on lateral side of tail ( Fig. 17B View FIGURE 17 ).
Range: Tsushima Islands (excluding the central to southern parts of Shimojima, former Izuhara-machi), in Nagasaki Prefecture, Western Japan ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). The known localities range from 25 m to 125 m (median 65 m, n=17) above sea level.
Comparisons: Hynobius tagoi is the closest to H. nebulosus in mtDNA phylogeny, but morphologically distinguished from H. nebulosus by larger body size (SVL: males: mean±SD=64.6± 3.4 mm vs. 61.4± 4.5 mm in H. nebulosus ; females: 63.9± 3.4 mm vs. 59.3± 4.7 mm in H. nebulosus ), relatively wider interorbital (RIOD: males: 6.1%SVL vs. 5.8%SVL in H. nebulosus ; females: 5.9%SVL vs. 5.4%SVL in H. nebulosus ) and upper eyelid (RUEW: males: 3.0%SVL vs. 2.8%SVL in H. nebulosus ; females: 3.1%SVL vs. 2.7%SVL in H. nebulosus ), relatively longer tail (RTAL: males: median 85.6%SVL vs. 77.2%SVL in H. nebulosus ; females: 76.4%SVL vs. 70.7%SVL in H. nebulosus ), relatively narrower tail (RMTAW: males: 5.5%SVL vs. 6.6%SVL in H. nebulosus ; females: 4.6%SVL vs. 6.2%SVL in H. nebulosus ), relatively lower tail at the base (RBTAH: males: 8.3%SVL vs. 9.8%SVL in H. nebulosus ; females: 7.5%SVL vs. 8.9%SVL in H. nebulosus ), relatively lower tail at the middle portion (RMTAH: males: 9.1%SVL vs. 11.2%SVL in H. nebulosus ; females: 8.3%SVL vs. 10.2%SVL in H. nebulosus ), relatively shorter axilla-groin distance (RAGD: males: 50.9%SVL vs. 52.4%SVL in H. nebulosus ; females: 52.9%SVL vs. 54.3%SVL in H. nebulosus ), relatively longer fifth toe (R5TL: males: 3.2%SVL vs. 2.7%SVL in H. nebulosus ; females: 3.1%SVL vs. 2.3%SVL in H. nebulosus ), larger degree of limb overlap (LO: males: -1.5 vs. -2.0 in H. nebulosus ; females: -2.5 vs. - 3.5 in H. nebulosus ). Moreover, H. tagoi differed from H. nebulosus in smaller egg-sacs (MAESL: 139.2± 16.4 mm vs. 277.3± 32.8 mm in Fukue and 278.1± 30.8 mm in topotypic Nagasaki populations of H. nebulosus ) and clutch size (CS: 45.5±11.4 vs. 175.9± 46.9 in Fukue and 111.7± 23.9 in the Nagasaki populations), and longer whiptail structure (WTL: median 15 mm vs. 0 mm in both Fukue and the Nagasaki populations).
Hynobius tagoi is distinct from H. tsuensis by the lateral color of the posterior half of tail: brown (not blackish or purplish color) with dark stipples in 96.3% of male and in 76.9% of female H. tagoi ; uniformly blackish [purplish] brown without markings in 96.0% of male and in 69.2% of female H. tsuensis . Also, H. tagoi is distinguishable from H. tsuensis by lacking distinct yellow stripe(s) on the tail, having brown dorsum with dark stipples (vs. usually, distinct yellow stripe(s) on the tail; blackish [purplish] brown dorsum with yellowish markings [spots] or yellowish dorsum with blackish [purplish] brown markings [spots] or dark brownish dorsum with dark [blackish] markings [spots] in H. tsuensis ). Hynobius tagoi morphologically differed from H. tsuensis by relatively narrower and shallower vomerine teeth series (RVTW: males: 5.0%SVL vs. 5.2%SVL in H. tsuensis ; females: 4.8%SVL vs. 5.2%SVL in H. tsuensis ; RVTL: males: 5.1%SVL vs. 5.5%SVL in H. tsuensis ; females: 5.0%SVL vs. 5.4%SVL in H. tsuensis ), and larger degree of limb overlap (LO: males: -1.5 vs. -2.0 in H. tsuensis ; females: -2.5 vs. -3.0 in H. tsuensis ). Clutch size and morphology of egg-sacs of H. tagoi are similar to H. tsuensis , but H. tagoi is distinct from H. tsuensis by having lower unfertilized egg rate (2.0% vs. 63.5% in H. tsuensis ).
The lotic-breeding H. tagoi is also genetically close to lentic-breeding H. dunni and H. bakan sensu lato (containing H. nagatoensis and H. nihoensis ), but distinguished from H. dunni by smaller degree of limb overlap (LO: males: -1.5 vs. +2.0 in H. dunni ; females: -2.5 vs. +2.0 in H. dunni [ Sato 1943]) and smaller clutch size (CS: mean±SD=45.5±11.4 vs. 95.1± 27.5 in H. dunni [ Sato 1943]); from H. bakan sensu lato by larger body size (SVL: mean±SD=64.6± 3.4 mm vs. 51.8± 5.7 mm in H. bakan sensu lato [ Matsui et al. 2019]), relatively longer tail (RTAL: median 85.6%SVL vs. 74.4%SVL in H. bakan sensu lato [ Matsui et al. 2019]), relatively lower tail (RMXTAH: 9.7%SVL vs. 12.4%SVL in H. bakan sensu lato [ Matsui et al. 2019]), relatively longer fifth toe (R5TL: 3.2%SVL vs. 2.0%SVL in H. bakan sensu lato [ Matsui et al. 2019]), and smaller clutch size (CS: 45.5±11.4 vs. 116.5± 58.2 in H. bakan sensu lato [ Matsui et al. 2019]).
Natural history: Hynobius tagoi breeds in lotic water such as mountain streams ( Fig. 19D View FIGURE 19 ), unlike the lentic-breeding H. nebulosus . Sometimes, H. tagoi breeds syntopically with H. tsuensis ( Niwa et al. 2021) . Breeding occurs from early February to early March, which is earlier than that of H. tsuensis (late March to mid-April). Females of H. tagoi oviposit a pair of egg-sacs to stones or debris under the water in streams ( Fig. 19B View FIGURE 19 ). Hatching occurs in late March to mid-April and larvae metamorphose in June to August of the first year. Overwintered larvae have not been discovered, unlike syntopic H. tsuensis , in which some overwintered larvae are found in mountain streams.
Conservation: Hynobius tagoi is conserved as specified class II nationally rare species of wild fauna/flora on the Environment Government of Japan, under the name of H. nebulosus . Hynobius tagoi has been listed as vulnerable (VU) on the Red List of Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan, 2020 (Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan 2020), under the name of H. nebulosus . Also, it is listed as VU on the Prefectural Red List of Nagasaki, 2022 ( Nagasaki Prefecture 2022), under the name of H. nebulosus . These ranks should be reconsidered because the distribution range of H. tagoi is smaller than 400 km 2.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.