Paragryllodini, Hugel & Warren & Desutter-Grandcolas, 2021
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5047.3.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7052707F-306C-49F4-8BD1-C5BAD9F9C128 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5540732 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EA4D6374-B945-FF8A-12D2-5B06332FFD37 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Paragryllodini |
| status |
trib. nov. |
Paragryllodini View in CoL Hugel & Desutter-Grandcolas, n. tribe
Type genus. Paragryllodes Karny, 1909 View in CoL , here designated.
Diagnosis. At this stage, one single genus is included in this new tribe. The diagnosis of Paragryllodini , therefore, is that of Paragryllodes (see infra).
Remark. Paragryllodes was tentatively placed in the subtribe Mexiaclina Gorochov, 2014 under the tribe Paragryllini Desutter, 1987 ( Gorochov 2015) . Molecular data clearly indicate that Paragryllodes is not related to Paragryllini . We therefore propose here the new tribe Paragryllodini n. tribe for the genus Paragryllodes , which represents a well-supported monophyletic clade within the Paragryllinae subfamily.
In the molecular phylogeny of Chintauan-Marquier et al. (2013, 2016), the Paragryllodes clade is very wellsupported within the Phalangopsidae clade E2 ( Chintauan-Marquier et al. 2016: Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ; 100% ML bootstrap support, 1 posterior probability), a result confirmed with a more extended data set ( Warren et al. 2019 and in prep.).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.