Clevelandella hromadkai, Kotyk & Bourland & Soviš & Méndez-Sánchez & Škaloud & Varadínová & Čepička, 2024

Kotyk, Michael, Bourland, William A., Soviš, Matyáš, Méndez-Sánchez, Daniel, Škaloud, Pavel, Varadínová, Zuzana Kotyková & Čepička, Ivan, 2024, Morphology maưers: congruence of morphology and phylogeny in the integrative taxonomy of Clevelandellidae (Ciliophora: Armophorea) with description of six new species, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 202 (1), pp. 1-51 : 8-10

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad154

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EA5087B3-1909-FFBB-FC73-FA529638F8A5

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Clevelandella hromadkai
status

sp. nov.

Clevelandella hromadkai sp.nov.

( Figs 8–11 View Figure 8 View Figure 9 View Figure 10 View Figure 11 ; Supporting Information, Tables S7–S10)

Description based on populations þom hosts ASS þom Papua Neo Guinea and PAC þom Vietnam: Medium to very large Clevelandella * widely variable in both size and shape. In ASS population* size in vivo 103–262 × 39–81 µm* usually about 164 × 57 µm; size in protargol preparations 77–164 × 25–66 µm* usually about 117 × 40 µm; in PAC population* size in vivo 127– 339 × 44–85 µm* usually about 190 × 58 µm; size in protargol preparations 110–276 × 31–83 µm* usually about 155 × 45 µm. Body shape usually broadly cultriform* ventral surface of the body proper convex* dorsal surface concave* anterior end of cell bluntly pointed and curved more ( Figs 9E View Figure 9 * 10C* E) or less ( Figs 9C View Figure 9 * H* 10B* 11A* D* E) in dorsal direction. Peristomial projection flares to merge gradually with body proper* prominence of less lobe varies from less conspicuous ( Figs 9A View Figure 9 * B* 10A) to more prominent ( Figs 8A View Figure 8 * D* F* 9D* F–H* 10F* 11B* C* E) with a notch formed between the lobe and peristomial projection ( Figs 8F View Figure 8 * 9F)* in contrast to spade-shaped species* the notch degree between peristomial projection and less lobe seems never to be under 90°; posterior margin of peristomial projection truncate. L/W ratio highly variable in individuals from both hosts* from shorter stouter forms ( Figs 8D–G View Figure 8 * 9A–I* 11A–E) to longer more slender cells ( Figs 8A View Figure 8 * B* 10A–F). Macronucleus broadly ellipsoidal in short forms ( Figs 8D View Figure 8 * E* 9A–F)* to narrowly ellipsoidal in long forms ( Fig. 10A–C View Figure 10 * E* F). Karyophore inconspicuous; when detectable* aưached to posterior end of macronucleus and right body margin ( Figs 8A View Figure 8 * B* D* 10A* D). Micronucleus ellipsoidal* usually adjacent to right anterior margin of macronucleus* enclosed in separate membrane ( Figs 8A View Figure 8 * B* D* 9A* C* E* F* 10A* C–E). Swims moderately fast while rotating around long axis.

Somatic ciliature composed of about 60–85 somatic ciliary rows in Clevelandellidae paưern; cilia present only on approximately anterior half of cell; about 20–25 ciliary rows on the peristomial projection in ASS population. Ciliary rows in PAC population not counted. Right suture has only two or three small free kinetofragments (not shown).

Peristomial projection occupies an average of 35% of total body length. Lateral part of peristomial opening extends about one-half ( Figs 9B View Figure 9 * 11B* D* E) length of peristomial projection in short cells* about one-third ( Fig. 10A View Figure 10 * B) length of peristomial projection in long cells. Adoral zone usually extends about 50% of body length* composed of an average of 54 (ASS) to 62 (PAC) membranelles* base of membranelles longest in midportion of peristomial projection. POM as described for the family ( Fig. 9I View Figure 9 ).

Remarks on short and long morphotypes: Clevelandella hromadkai shows considerable intraspecific phenotypic variability. Ŋe ASS population* while genetically uniform* can be divided in two distinct phenotypes: short ( Figs 8D–G View Figure 8 * 9A–I* 11A–F) and long ( Figs 8A View Figure 8 * B* 10A–F). In a single host* only one phenotype seems to occur at a given time; from nine thoroughly inspected hosts the short morph occurred in two females and two larvae * the long morph occurred in four males and one larva. Apart from the obvious length difference (mean in vivo 127 µm vs. 215 µm) and other morphological characteristics (e.g. number of adoral membranelles—see Supporting Information* Tables S8* S9)* both morphs can be distinguished by their shapes: the short one is stouter (body L/W ratio 2.5) with a more rounded anterior end and the long one is more slender (body L/W ratio 3.7).

Occurrence: Ŋree distinct populations of C. hromadkai were found in the hindguts of three Panesthiinae populations:ASS from Papua New Guinea * PAA from Philippines * and PAC from Vietnam. Ŋe ASS population occurred in 63% of host individuals regardless of age and sex. When present* C. hromadkai was less abundant (a few tens of individuals) compared to other ciliate species present in a host. Ŋe PAC population occurred in 28% of host individuals. Out of nine infected hosts* one was a large larva and eight were visibly old adult males. Most of the PAC hosts exhibited low occurrence of C. hromadkai (around 10 cells) with other ciliate species being more abundant. Ŋe exception was one male that harboured around 50 cells of C. hromadkai . When C. hromadkai was present in PAC hosts* the populations of other ciliates were visibly low compared to PAC host* in which C. hromadkai was absent. Ŋe PAA population occurred in only 17% of host individuals. Out of two infected hosts (both adult males)* one exhibited a low occurrence of the C. hromadkai with the other ciliate species being more abundant. Ŋe other host exhibited high occurrence of C. hromadkai with other ciliates being scarce.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF