Clevelandella elongata ( Kidder, 1937 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad154 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EA5087B3-1914-FFAF-FEC8-FA579690FD84 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Clevelandella elongata ( Kidder, 1937 ) |
status |
|
Clevelandella elongata ( Kidder, 1937)
( Figs 25–27 View Figure 25 View Figure 26 View Figure 27 ; Supporting Information, Table S34)
Clevelandella elongata was detected and morphologically characterized in one population (SRU). When present* C. elongata was moderately abundant (20–30 cells per host) with the other ciliate species being more abundant.
Description based on SRU population:
Largest member of Clevelandellidae (on average 285 × 54 µm in vivo * range 245–321 × 43–71 µm; on average 220 × 61 µm in protargol preparations* range 184–259 × 43–75 µm). Elongated* almost vermiform in vivo * slightly dorsoventrally flaưened* anterior end bluntly pointed* posterior end truncate and slightly flared* ventral margin convex* dorsal margin concave ( Figs 25C View Figure 25 * 27C). Cells shrink asymmetrically in protargol preparations (see Supporting Information* Table S50) and long axis straightens
(white arrow)* and the posterior extent of ciliation on the right margin (black arrowhead). G* H* the same cell in ventral view* with detail of peristomial overture (black arrowhead). I* detail view of the long file (black arrowhead) and short file (white arrowhead) of the paroral membrane. J* ventral view (optical section) showing excretory antrum within less protuberance (black arrow). K* ventral view showing micronucleus (white arrow) and karyophore (black arrowhead). L* ventral view (optical section) showing micronucleus and adoral membranelles (black arrow). M* ventral view (optical section) showing anterior margin of the peristomial overture (black arrowhead). N* ventral view showing relatively large micronucleus (white arrow). O* detail of same cell as (N) showing micronucleus (white arrowhead) and karyophore (black arrowhead). P* ventral view showing micronucleus (white arrow). Q* ventral view showing micronucleus (white arrow). R* dorsal view of same cell as (Q) showing straight dorsal kineties (asterisk). S* detail of karyophore (white arrowhead). T* detail view of the long file (white arrowhead) and short file (black arrowhead) of the paroral membrane. Ma* macronucleus. Scale bars: 20 µm (A–H* J–N* P–R)* 10 µm (I* O* S* T).
compared with more sinuous living specimens. Peristomial projection merges gradually with body proper hampering precise length measurement but* on average 20% of cell length (range 14–23%). Macronucleus broadly lenticular* situated slightly obliquely in anterior half of cell* large relative to cell (on average 51 × 24 µm)* karyophore at anterior and posterior ends of macronucleus* usually distinct in vivo and in protargol preparations but sometimes indiscernible. Micronucleus large* globular (on average 7 µm diameter)* adjacent to anterior end of macronucleus. Somatic cilia arranged in very closely spaced kineties* somatic cilia limited to approximately anterior 50% of cell* usually a short ‘tail’ of ciliated cortex extends posteriorly ( Fig. 27A View Figure 27 * B* D). Right sutural kinetofragments absent. Circumperistomial kineties very densely ciliated ( Fig. 27A View Figure 27 * B* D* E). Adoral zone extends about 45% of cell length on average* composed of an average of 94 membranelles (range 75–120). POM diplostichomonad only in anterior quarter ( Fig. 26A View Figure 26 * E).
Remarks: Individuals of our population were longer and distinctly more slender in vivo than indicated by Kidder’s diagnosis for the species. Kidder (1937) did not specify whether his diagnosis for C. elongata was based on measurements from in vivo observations or fixed material* although the laưer possibility seems most plausible given the technology available at that time.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |