Neoxyphinus inca Moss & Ruiz
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4098.1.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:579B810B-0B07-44B0-B252-ADF72EAD2396 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6086944 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EB0F2402-FFDC-B27D-65E9-1831F443A4AF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neoxyphinus inca Moss & Ruiz |
status |
sp. nov. |
Neoxyphinus inca Moss & Ruiz View in CoL , sp. nov.
Figs 5 View FIGURES 3 – 12 , 14 View FIGURES 13 – 18 , 71–98 View FIGURES 71 – 80 View FIGURES 81 – 88 View FIGURES 89 – 98 ; Map 1
Type material: Holotype: male from road to Manu, km 165, Consuelo, Cusco, Peru, litter under crown of fallen tree, 7 October 1982, L.E. Watrous & G. Mazurek leg. ( FMNH 0 33 572, PBI _OON 10079). Paratype: one female from Tambopata, Madre de Dios, Peru (12°34'23.02"S, 69°12'50.06"W), litter under crow of fallen tree, 28 October 1982, L.E. Watrous & G. Mazurek leg. ( FMNH 0 33 543, PBI _OON 10050).
Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition and refers to the ancestral people who lived in the region where the specimens were collected.
Diagnosis. Males resemble those of N. coca sp. nov. ( Figs 49, 50, 54 View FIGURES 48 – 55 ), N. beni sp. nov. ( Figs 108–111 View FIGURES 108 – 115 ) and N. tuparro sp. nov. ( Figs 127, 128, 131, 132 View FIGURES 125 – 138 ) by the smooth carapace, with enlarged setal sockets on the posterior surface, unmodified sternum, and absence of denticles on abdominal dorsal scutum ( Figs 71–73, 75 View FIGURES 71 – 80 ). Differ from those of N. coca sp. nov. ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 56 – 61 ) by the presence of a prolateral, proximal embolar lamella ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 81 – 88 ); from those of N. beni sp. nov. ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 3 – 12 ) by the shorter embolar apical projection ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 12 ) and from those of N. tuparro sp. nov. ( Figs 12 View FIGURES 3 – 12 , 138 View FIGURES 125 – 138 ) by the absence of an additional, retrolateral embolar process ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 3 – 12 , 78 View FIGURES 71 – 80 , 86 View FIGURES 81 – 88 ). Females differ from those of N. coca sp. nov. ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 62 – 70 ) by the smooth carapace and from those of N. beni sp. nov. ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ) by the genital median element placed anteriorly ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ).
Description. Male (PBI_OON 10680): total length 2.30. Cephalothorax: carapace dark red-brown, broadly oval, pars cephalica slightly elevated, posterolateral surface without spikes, surface and sides smooth; lateral margin with small denticles ( Figs 74–75 View FIGURES 71 – 80 ); posterior part with one pair of well-developed tubercles ( Figs 75 View FIGURES 71 – 80 , 82 View FIGURES 81 – 88 ); recurved set of setae on posterior surface with four small tubercles ( Fig. 82 View FIGURES 81 – 88 ). Clypeus margin slightly reborded, straight in frontal view ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 71 – 80 ). Sternum as long as wide, dark red-brown, with smooth surface. Chelicerae, endites and labium dark red-brown. Abdomen: book lung covers large and round. Dorsal scutum dark red-brown, middle surface and sides smooth, anterior half without projecting denticles ( Figs 77 View FIGURES 71 – 80 , 84 View FIGURES 81 – 88 ). Epigastric and postepigastric scutum dark red-brown. Legs: orange-brown. Leg spination: tibia I v4-4 -0; metatarus I v2-2 -0. Genitalia: epigastric region with sperm pore small and circular. Palp proximal articles, bulb and cymbium pale orange. Embolus without prolateral prong, apical projection truncated ( Figs 86, 88 View FIGURES 81 – 88 ).
Female (PBI_OON 10680): total length 2.56. Cephalothorax: carapace posterior surface with two pairs of tubercles ( Fig. 93 View FIGURES 89 – 98 ). Clypeus high ( Fig. 95 View FIGURES 89 – 98 ). Abdomen: groove connecting the posterior spiracles bearing pockets ( Fig. 98 View FIGURES 89 – 98 ). Legs: leg spination: tibia I v6-2 -2; II v4-4 -0; metatarsus I v4-2 -0; II v4 -0-2. Genitalia: circular genital median element ( Figs 14 View FIGURES 13 – 18 , 98 View FIGURES 89 – 98 ).
Other material examined. PERU: Cusco: 1♀, road to Manu, km 165, 0 7 October 1982, leaf litter, L.E. Watrous & G. Mazurek leg. ( FMNH 0 33 542, PBI _OON 10049); 1♂, 0 1 October 1982, rotten palm fruit L.E. Watrous & G. Mazurek leg. ( FMNH 0 33 588, PBI _OON 10095); 1♀, 0 6 October 1982, leaf litter, L.E Watrous & G. Mazurek leg ( FMNH 0 33 590, PBI _OON 10097); 5♂, 12 October 1982, leaf litter, L.E. Watrous & G. Mazurek leg. ( FMNH 82-375, PBI _OON 38408); 1♂ ( FMNH 82-360, PBI _OON 38406); 1♂ ( FMNH 82-381, PBI _OON 38407); 1♂, Río Camisea Pagoreni (11°42’22.5”S, 72°54’10.7”W), 0 9 September 1998, 465 m, S. Córdova leg. ( MUSM 050/436, PBI _OON 40592); 2♂, 07–28 May 1998, pitfall trap, S. Córdova leg. ( MUSM 050/434, PBI _OON 40601); 1♀, 1♂ ( MUSM 050/429, PBI _OON 40587); 1♂ ( MUSM 050/430, PBI _OON 40590); 1♀, Río Camisea, San Martin (11°47’09.8”S, 72°42’05.3”W), 0 9 November 1997, pitfall trap, 474 m, S. Córdova leg. ( MUSM 0500/467, PBI _OON 40596); 1♀ ( MUSM 0500/466, PBI _OON 40588); 1♂, 0 7 November 1997 ( MUSM 0500-463, PBI _OON 40595); 1♂, 0 8 November 1997 (MUSM-ENT 050/465, PBI _OON 40597). Madre de Dios: 1♂, Tambopata, 25 October 1982, litter along river, L.E. Watrous & G. Mazurek leg. ( FMNH 0 33 548, PBI _OON 10055); 1♂, 25 October 1982, rotten palm flowers, L.E. Watrous & G. Mazurek leg. ( FMNH 0 33 592, PBI _OON 10099); 1♀, 28 October 1982, bamboo litter, L.E. Watrous & G. Mazurek leg. ( FMNH 82-402, PBI _OON 10607); 1♂ ( FMNH 82-402, PBI _OON 10625). Loreto: 1♀, 1♂, Pithecia (4°13'55.89"S, 74°13'3.74"W), T. Erwin & D. Silva leg. ( MUSM, PBI _OON 40604).
Distribution. Known from Loreto, Madre de Dios and Cusco Departments in Peru.
FMNH |
Field Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |