Diaphorocellus isalo, Zonstein & Marusik, 2020
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/AfrInvertebr.61.47048 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C1193BE3-8442-4AB6-AF7E-1683FCB609C3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6B99BCC0-B4BC-4865-8E19-7AF5E7591989 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:6B99BCC0-B4BC-4865-8E19-7AF5E7591989 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Diaphorocellus isalo |
status |
sp. nov. |
Diaphorocellus isalo sp. nov. Figs 1A-D View Figure 1 , 2A-B View Figure 2 , 3A-B View Figure 3 , 4A-C View Figure 4 , 5A-B View Figure 5 , 6A View Figure 6 , 7A-D View Figure 7 , 8A View Figure 8 , 9 View Figure 9
Etymology.
The specific name is a toponym referring to the type locality, Isalo.
Types.
Holotype ♂, and paratype ♀ from Madagascar, Fianarantsoa Province, Isalo, 22°38'S, 45°21'E, 20.iii.1994, A. Pauly (RMCA ARA 201275).
Diagnosis.
The holotype male of D. isalo sp. nov. can be distinguished from the males of D. jocquei sp. n. by its larger size (CL 2.25 vs. 2.0), by presence of the cymbial spines vs. absence, and by the tapering prolateral arm of the tegular apophysis vs. widened arm. Females of these two species clearly differ in the shape of the membranous sacs of the endogyne: small globular in D. isalo sp. nov. vs. large subconical in D. jocquei sp. nov. In D. isalo sp. nov. the PME almost touch each other, while in D. isalo sp. nov. these eyes are slightly distant from each other (Figs 2A-B View Figure 2 cf. Figs 2C-D View Figure 2 ). Additionally, D. isalo sp. nov. differs from D. biplagiatus by possessing a finely spotted dorsal abdominal pattern, as well as by lacking very long retrolateral setae of the male palp, by having a short palpal femur (length/width ratio 2.3 vs. 3.2) and by presence of the membranous sacs in the endogyne (vs. absent). Other diagnostic characters of D. isalo sp. nov. are noted in the Discussion.
Description.
Male. RMCA ARA 201275 (holotype).
Habitus: as in Figs 1A-B View Figure 1 . Colour in alcohol: carapace, chelicerae and dorsal abdominal scutum dark carmine brown; legs I intense reddish orange; palps and legs II-IV light to medium yellowish orange; sternum, labium, maxillae and ventral abdominal scutum reddish brown; abdomen dorsally dark brown with numerous light yellowish brown spots, ventrally uniformly medium yellowish brown. Measurements: TL 4.50, CL 2.10, CW 1.45, CH 0.95, CyL 0.29, Femur I L/W 1.88 (1.50/0.80). Carapace: with rather coarse granulations (Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ). Eyes: AME 0.14, ALE 0.09, PME 0.13, PLE 0.07, AME-AME 0.04, AME-ALE 0.07, PLE-PME 0.14, PME-PME 0.01.
Copulatory organs. Palp as shown in Figs 4A-C View Figure 4 , 5A-B View Figure 5 , 6A View Figure 6 . Femur 2.6 times longer than wide, 1.2 times longer than cymbium; patella globular, thinner than femur; tibia swollen, as long as wide, 1.4 times wider than femur. Cymbium antero-retrolaterally with tight bunch of strong spines, retrolaterally with dense brush of thick setae. Bulb globular, partly embedded into tibia, with two long (longer than tegulum) extensions: tegular apophysis and embolus. Tegular apophysis with two arms, pro- and retrolateral; prolateral arm with kind of comb on inner side; both arms bent on tip. Embolus located prolaterally, flat and long, almost as long as tegular apophysis.
Leg measurements: male RMCA ARA 201275 (female RMCA ARA 201275 in brackets):
Femur | Patella | Tibia | Metatarsus | Tarsus | Total | |
Palp | 0.53 (0.63) | 0.16 (0.27) | 0.34 (0.35) | - | 0.44 (0.42) | 1.47 (1.67) |
I | 1.50 (1.63) | 1.05 (1.25) | 0.93 (1.05) | 0.33 (0.40) | 0.43 (0.45) | 4.24 (4.78) |
II | 1.05 (1.25) | 0.63 (0.63) | 0.70 (0.88) | 0.50 (0.58) | 0.38 (0.40) | 3.26 (3.74) |
III | 0.90 (1.00) | 0.50 (0.58) | 0.65 (0.70) | 0.55 (0.63) | 0.38 (0.35) | 2.98 (3.26) |
IV | 1.25 (1.50) | 0.70 (0.88) | 1.00 (1.25) | 0.88 (1.05) | 0.45 (0.43) | 4.28 (5.11) |
Female RMCA ARA 201275 (paratype).
Habitus: as in Figs 1C-D View Figure 1 . Colour in alcohol: as in male, but legs II-IV and abdomen paler. Measurements: TL 6.50, CL 2.25, CW 1.55, CH 0.85, CyL 0.31, Femur I L/W 1.85 (1.63/0.88). Carapace: longer, with less coarse granulations than in male (Fig. 2B View Figure 2 ). Eyes: AME 0.12, ALE 0.07, PLE 0.07, PME 0.13, AME-AME 0.04, AME-ALE 0.07, PME-PLE 0.14, PME-PME 0.01. Epigastral scutum entire (fused dorsally), with a pair of round plaque-like structures dorsally, book lung operculum large, extends above petiolar orifice.
Copulatory organs: as in Figs 3B View Figure 3 , 7A-D View Figure 7 , 8A View Figure 8 . Epigastral plate in intact specimen accompanied by 2 pairs of sclerites lying on postgastrum (posterior from epigastral furrow): two small dot-like median sclerites and pair of longitudinal sclerites. Endogyne formed by pair of complex receptacles. Receptacle (Re) consists of complex sclerotised base and transparent, membranous cylindric sac (Figs 7A-D View Figure 7 ). Each receptacle accompanied by brushes of fine threads and 3 grape-shaped glands attached to receptacles by long thread-like stems.
Note.
Following maceration of the epigastral scutum, two additional pairs of dot-like sclerites were revealed (Fig. 7C View Figure 7 ).
Habitat.
According to the collecting data, the specimens were found near a natural pool in a rocky massif.
Distribution.
Known only from the type locality (Fig. 9 View Figure 9 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |