Carpinus

Holstein, Norbert & Weigend, Maximilian, 2017, No taxon left behind? - a critical taxonomic checklist of Carpinus and Ostrya (Coryloideae, Betulaceae), European Journal of Taxonomy 375, pp. 1-52: 26-27

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.375

DOI

http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3852893

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/EC30B96A-FF8F-FFC1-5605-8A47FC27FC87

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Carpinus
status

 

35. Carpinus   × schuschaensis H.J.P.Winkl.

Das Pflanzenreich IV 61 (Heft 19): 32 ( Winkler 1904). – C. betulus   [unranked] schuschaensis (H.J.P. Winkl.) Medw., Vestnik Tiflisskogo Botanicheskogo Sada 14: 33 ( Medwedew 1909). – C. betulus   f. schuschaensis (H.J.P.Winkl.) Radde-Fom., Trudy fizychno-matematychnogo viddilu. Kiev [Mémoires de la Classe des Sciences Physiques et Mathématiques de l’Académie des Sciences de l’Ukraine] 15 (1): 80 ( Radde-Fomina 1929) comb. inval. pro syn. – Type: Karabagh, Schuscha, R.F. Hohenacker s.n. (syn-: B†, G-Boiss., W). – Note: Radde-Fomina published the combination C. betulus   f. schuschaensis in synonymy, because she believed that Medwedew understood the name as a forma. However, Medwedew used the term “form” informally, as he used form ( Medwedew 1909: 33) and variety ( Medwedew 1909: 41) in parallel. His combinations are therefore unranked (Art. 37.8; McNeill et al. 2012). Biologically, this is a hybrid between C. betulus   and C. orientalis   .

C. × grosseserrata H.J.P.Winkl., Das Pflanzenreich IV 61 (Heft 19): 40 ( Winkler 1904). – Type: Iran, bei Radkan, F.A. Buhse 1043 (holo-: B†).

C. × hybrida H.J.P.Winkl., Das Pflanzenreich IV 61 (Heft 19): 40 ( Winkler 1904). – Type:Transkaukasien, R.F. Hohenacker (syn-: B† and/or LE). Karabagh, s. coll., s.n. (syn-: B† and/or LE).

C. × oxycarpa H.J.P.Winkl., Das Pflanzenreich IV 61 (Heft 19): 31 ( Winkler1904). – C. betulus   [unranked] oxycarpa (H.J.P. Winkl.) Medw., Vestnik Tiflisskogo Botanicheskogo Sada 14: 27 ( Medwedew 1909). – C. betulus   f. oxycarpa (H.J.P. Winkl.) Radde-Fom., Trudy fizychno-matematychnogo viddilu. Kiev [Mémoires de la Classe des Sciences Physiques et Mathématiques de l’Académie des Sciences de l’Ukraine] 15 (1): 83 ( Radde-Fomina 1929) comb. inval. pro syn. – Type: Karabagh, Schuscha, R.F. Hohenacker, U. i. 1838 (syn-: B†, G-Boiss.?, LE, Herb. Moritz Winkler, W†). – Note: Olga Radde-Fomina’s combination in synonymy is a misunderstanding. She believed that Medwedew published a forma, but he used the term “form” informally, which is apparent in the index of his treatment, where he explicitly notes “ var. oxycarpa (Winkl.) Medw.   ” ( Medwedew 1909: 41). Medwedew’s combination is nevertheless to be regarded as unranked (Art. 37.8, McNeill et al. 2012). In contrast to Winkler’s note ( Winkler 1904), duplicates are not present in “Breslau” (Wrocław; BRSL or WRSL, pers. comm. K. Świerkosz).

C. × oxycarpa nothovar. betuloides H.J.P.Winkl., Das Pflanzenreich IV 61 (Heft 19): 32 ( Winkler 1904). – Type: Karabagh, bei Schuscha, R.F. Hohenacker, U. i. 1838 (syn-: B†, G, LE).

C. × geokczaica Radde-Fom., Trudy fizychno-matematychnogo viddilu. Kiev [Mémoires de la Classe des Sciences Physiques et Mathématiques de l’Académie des Sciences de l’Ukraine] 15 (1): 89 (Radde- Fomina 1929). – Original citation: “Prov. Baku distr. Geokczai, in frutecetis siccis in ascensu as pagum Vaenk 1700’. 31 VII. 1899. Alexeenko (Herb. Acad. Petrop.) Prov. Baku distr. Schemacha, prope pagum Müdshi, in decliviis meridionalibus, in papidosis calcareis. 4000’. 30. VII. 1900. Alexeenko (Herb. Acad. Petrop.)”. – Type: not localized.