Pristiphora leucopus ( Hellen , 1948)

Prous, Marko, Vikberg, Veli, Liston, Andrew & Kramp, Katja, 2016, North-Western Palaearctic species of the Pristiphora ruficornis group (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae), Journal of Hymenoptera Research 51, pp. 1-54 : 24-26

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9162

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B3D68EDB-9CF8-44A3-BC43-E9C2D6626BD7

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ED21A7D9-3C31-6FDA-2D1C-524D6DF727C0

treatment provided by

Journal of Hymenoptera Research by Pensoft

scientific name

Pristiphora leucopus ( Hellen , 1948)
status

 

Pristiphora leucopus ( Hellen, 1948)

Nematus vitreipennis Eversmann in Kawall, 1864: 295, syn. n. Nomen oblitum. Note. Kawall (1864) published an unaltered manuscript from Eversmann’s legacy. Lectotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym30027; here designated) in ZIN, examined. Type locality: foothills of Ural mountains [In promontor. Uralensibus], Russia.

Nematus (Pristiphora) ruficornis var. leucopus Hellén, 1948: 116. Nomen protectum. No syntypes were found in MZH. Type locality: Joutseno, South-Eastern Finland, Finland and Pionerskoye [ Kuolemajärvi], Leningrad Oblast, Russia. Note. The lectotype of Nematus vitreipennis (which was the only specimen found under this name in Eversmann’s collection in ZIN) agrees well with the summer morph (completely pale metafemur) of P. leucopus ( Grearson and Liston 2012). The name Nematus vitreipennis has apparently not been used as valid since 1884 ( Brischke 1884), whereas Pristiphora leucopus has been used as the valid name for this taxon more than 25 times by more than 10 different authors since 1955 ( Lindqvist 1955). According to Article 23.9.1 ( ICZN 1999), the prevailing usage must be maintained.

Similar species.

The most similar species to P. leucopus is P. armata . Differences between these two species were extensively discussed by Grearson and Liston (2012). Whereas P. leucopus exhibits seasonal dimorphism of adults, involving leg colour and shape of the serrulae of the lancet, no such dimorphism has been observed in P. armata . Briefly, both male and female specimens which have a completely or nearly completely pale metafemur (Fig. 22 View Figures 18–36 ) can be distinguished from P. armata (metafemur of which is always completely or in most part black). Other specimens, with a black or mostly black metafemur (Fig. 21 View Figures 18–36 ), cannot be distinguished externally. Unfortunately, differences in lancets (Figs 54-57 View Figures 54–57 ) and penis valves (Figs 83-86 View Figures 77–86 ) are also small and might not always be detectable. According to Grearson and Liston (2012) the general proportions of the lamnium of P. leucopus (Fig. 54 View Figures 54–57 ) are more slender than that of P. armata (Figs 56-57 View Figures 54–57 ), but this does not always work, because P. leucopus can have a distinctly wider lamnium than P. armata , though serrulae are in this case somewhat weaker (Fig. 55 View Figures 54–57 ). Males can perhaps be distinguished through small differences in penis valves (Figs 85-86 View Figures 77–86 and Figs 9-10 View Figures 3–17 in Grearson and Liston 2012), as described by Grearson and Liston (2012) (see also under P. armata ). Females with a black metafemur might also be confused with some specimens of P. confusa (if they have a com pletely smooth mesepisternum). Usually, P. leucopus (Fig. 29 View Figures 18–36 ) has a uniformly dark brown pterostigma (usually basally dark brown and apically brown in P. confusa ; Fig. 28 View Figures 18–36 ), but the specimens with pterostigma apically paler than basally might not be externally distinguishable from P. confusa . However, small differences in the lancets can help distinguish these species, as ctenidia in P. confusa tend to be more distinct (Figs 62-63 View Figures 62–65 ).

Genetic data.

Based on COI barcode sequences, P. leucopus belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAQ2302) as P. armata (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). The nearest neighbour (BOLD:AAG3568) is 2.76% different. BOLD:AAG3568 includes P. aphantoneura , P. bifida , P. confusa , P. luteipes , P. opaca , P. pusilla , P. staudingeri , and P. subopaca . Neither does our limited nuclear data allow separation of P. leucopus from P. armata (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ). The single heterozygous female would have a sequence identical to the single available P. armata sequence if heterozygous sites (double peaks in chromatograms) were excluded. All the six heterozygous sites in P. leucopus include also the nucleotide found in P. armata , possibly indicating haplotype sharing between these two taxa.

Host plants.

Tilia cordata Mill. ( Kangas 1985; Grearson 2006; Grearson and Liston 2012), Tilia x vulgaris Hayne ( Grearson 2006).

Distribution and material examined.

Western Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Austria, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Russia, and Sweden.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Tenthredinidae

Genus

Pristiphora

Loc

Pristiphora leucopus ( Hellen , 1948)

Prous, Marko, Vikberg, Veli, Liston, Andrew & Kramp, Katja 2016
2016
Loc

Nematus vitreipennis

Kawall 1864
1864
Loc

Nematus vitreipennis

Kawall 1864
1864
Loc

Nematus vitreipennis

Kawall 1864
1864