Toxoplasma gondii detection
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2017.08.004 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ED258269-7862-FF97-FFBB-FDC90DF9FB7C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Toxoplasma gondii detection |
status |
|
3.4. Toxoplasma gondii detection in tissues and organs
Following traditional (kit based) DNA extraction, T. gondii was detected by PCR in 3 — 8 tissues from each infected reindeer ( Table 2); heart was negative for all 3 reindeer and triceps was the only tissue that tested positive in all three reindeer. Following MC DNA extraction, DNA of T. gondii was detected in all tissue samples tested ( Table 2). Sequence analysis indicated 99% identity with T. gondii Type III VEG strain. For those tissues tested using both techniques (n = 26), the proportion of positive tissues among all tissues tested by traditional DNA extraction was 61.5% (16/26), and 100% (26/26) for MC. For traditional DNA extraction, positive controls of infected mice brain gave positive results, as well as the spiked beef sample for MC. Genotyping of MC positive samples (brain, heart, diaphragm) of each of the exposed reindeer were identified as T. gondii Type III VEG strain, the same strain given at inoculation.
No evidence of T. gondii was detected after serological and molecular testing of tissues from the unexposed control reindeer. The lack of personnel, time, material, and changes in the protocol after the euthanasia of the unexposed control reindeer explained the difference in number and quantity of samples collected and tested compared to the exposed ones.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |