Fabaeformiscandona monticulus, Peng & Zhai & Smith & Wang & Guo & Zhu, 2021

Peng, Ping, Zhai, Dayou, Smith, Robin J., Wang, Qianwei, Guo, Yun & Zhu, Liping, 2021, On some modern Ostracoda (Crustacea) from the Tibetan Plateau in SW China with descriptions of three new species, Zootaxa 4942 (4), pp. 501-542: 526-531

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4942.4.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EB79F747-805C-46AB-BBC1-191191B860A2

DOI

http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4644563

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/ED6E87E9-FFE1-FFAC-FF66-F888FCAD6CED

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Fabaeformiscandona monticulus
status

n. sp.

Fabaeformiscandona monticulus   n. sp.

( Figs 23–26 View FIGURE 23 View FIGURE 24 View FIGURE 25 View FIGURE 26 )

Type locality. A pond in Kangding , Garze, Sichuan, China (30.07745ºN, 101.79605ºE, altitude 4207 m) ( OS09-1, Table 1 View TABLE 1 ) GoogleMaps   .

Type material. Holotype: one dissected male ( WOC14) from type locality ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 )   . Allotype: one dissected female ( WOC15) from type locality   . Paratype: one dissected male ( WOC17) from type locality ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 )   .

Derivation of name. From the Latin monticulus   , the diminutive form of mountain, and referring to the large and triangular a lobe of the Hp, which is reminiscent of a mountain peak. The name is a noun in apposition.

Dimensions. Male (LV, n = 2) length 0.82–0.84 mm, H/L ratio 0.55. Female (LV, n = 1) length 0.79 mm, H/L ratio 0.54.

Description of male. Carapace ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 ) sub-reniform in lateral view. Dorsal margin nearly evenly arched, with highest point at about 1/3 of length from posterior end. Both anterior and posterior ends broadly rounded, maximum curvature of anterior margin in antero-ventral area. Ventral margin significantly concave. Valve surface sparsely covered with fine setae. In dorsal view, carapace moderately compressed, with anterior end more pointed than posterior end. In interior view, antero-ventral area of calcified inner lamella unusually wide in LV of both sexes, with inner margin straight or even slightly curved inwards.

A1 ( Fig. 24A, B View FIGURE 24 ) with eight segments, first two fused forming large base, carrying two dorsal setae and two unequally long ventro-apical setae. Third segment short and rectangular, with one dorso-apical seta. Fourth segment short, with one dorso-apical seta. Fifth segment sub-quadrate, with one dorso-apical seta extending beyond terminal segment with about half of length, and one short ventro-apical seta. Sixth segment sub-quadrate, with two long dorso-apical setae and one short ventro-apical seta. Seventh segment elongate, with two long dorso-apical setae and two short ventro-apical setae. Eighth segment slender, with three unequally long setae and dorso-apically situated aesthetasc y a.

A2 ( Fig. 24C, I, J View FIGURE 24 ) first segment (coxa) with one long posterior seta and two unequal ventral setae, shorter one of which robust and plumose. Second segment (basis) robust, with one slender ventro-apical seta extending beyond terminal of next segment. Exopod plate small, carrying three progressively long setae, longest of which extending to about end of first endopodal segment. Endopod with penultimate segment sub-divided. Third segment (first endopodal segment) robust, with slender aesthetasc Y situated behind mid-length, extending to about ventro-apical end of this segment, and with two sub-equal ventro-apical setae extending slightly beyond terminal segment. Fourth segment sub-rectangular, ventrally carrying small aesthetasc y1, distally carrying three t-setae, two of which transformed into male bristles, and one dorso-apical seta. Fifth segment quadrate, ventro-apically with small aesthetasc y2. z1 and z2 transformed into robust claws, with z2 longer and thicker than z1. z3 small, claw-like. G2 longest claw, two times length of G1. G3 slender. Terminal segment small. Gm extending to about tip of G2. Gm less than half length of GM. Aesthetasc part of y3 slender.

Md ( Fig. 24D, E View FIGURE 24 ) coxa elongate, interiorly bearing ca. eight slender teeth. One stout seta present on antero-subapical part of coxa. Palp four-segmented. First segment robust, with four ventral setae, including smooth unnamed seta, plumose seta S1, short plumose seta S2, and thin, smooth seta α. Second segment short, with two dorso-apical setae and ventro-apically, group of four smooth setae, shorter accompanying seta and tiny seta β. Third segment with three slender dorso-subapical setae, two stiff intero-apical setae (including seta γ) and one long and one tiny ventro-apical setae. Fourth segment slightly elongate, with two more robust setae/claws and two slender setae.

First segment of Mx palp ( Fig. 24F View FIGURE 24 ) with four dorso-apical setae. Second segment elongate, with two more robust claws/setae and two smaller setae. Tooth bristles on distal gnathobasic endite smooth. Two robust setae present on proximal side of proximal endite.

L5 ( Fig. 24G, H View FIGURE 24 ) gnathobasic endite with ca. 14 apical setae, two of which bifurcate distally (one observed in left L5 of holotype). Right L5 palp progressively slenderer distally, bearing two sub-apical setae. Right L5 palp with blunt dorsal bump on median part of trunk, finger slender and elongate, one of two sub-apical setae claw-like.

L6 ( Fig. 25A View FIGURE 25 ) with five segments. First segment elongate and less sclerotized, carrying intermediately long seta d1. Second segment long, with seta e reaching distal part of third segment. Third segment and fourth segment subequally long, each with one distal seta. Fifth segment elongate and trapezoidal, with seta h1 longer than h3. Claw h2 much longer than total length of three terminal segments, slightly serrated at sub-apical part.

L7 ( Fig. 25B View FIGURE 25 ) generally well sclerotized, with four segments, penultimate segment undivided. First segment with setae d1 and dp. Second segment without seta. Third segment distally with curved seta g. Fourth segment elongate and rectangular, with setae h1, h2 and h3 progressively longer. Seta h3 only faintly curved at sub-apical part.

Ur ( Fig. 25C, D View FIGURE 25 ) ramus stout and robust, basal part swollen. Sa slim. Ga sub-equally long to Gp but slightly more robust, both serrated. Sp situated at ca. 1/4 length of ramus from distal end, longer than Sa. Ur attachment medially with two branches and proximally with tri-ramous branch.

Hp ( Fig. 25E View FIGURE 25 ) with large, triangular outer lobe a, small, triangular median lobe h, and interiorly, pointed, setalike structure. M-process only slightly enlarged distally.

ZO ( Fig. 26 View FIGURE 26 ) with 5+2 rosettes each bearing numerous spines.

Additional description of female. Carapace ( Fig. 23B & G View FIGURE 23 ) dorsal margin nearly straight and sloping anteriorly. Posterior end narrowly rounded (not broadly rounded as in male), with maximum curvature at postero-ventral area, postero-dorsal margin gently curving up to hinge. Anterior margin similar to that of male. Calcified inner lamella wide, especially in antero-ventral area; here inner edge of calcified inner lamella almost straight. Posterior part of both valves with polygonal pattern ( Fig. 23G View FIGURE 23 ).

Distal morphology of A2 ( Fig. 24I View FIGURE 24 ). t-setae subequally long but with t2 slightly longer, extending beyond terminal segment with half of length. z-setae extending slightly beyond terminal segment. G1 and G3 longest claws. G2 about half length of G1, slender. GM extending to or slightly beyond G1. Gm about 3/4 length of GM.

GL ( Fig. 25C View FIGURE 25 ) very small and narrowly rounded.

Remarks. The smooth γ seta on the Md and the relatively laterally compressed carapace indicates that this species belongs to the genus Fabaeformiscandona   . Of the 55 species in this genus, most have carapaces noticeably different in shape to those of Fabaeformiscandona monticulus   n. sp., but three do show a resemblance in the lateral view of the female: Fabaeformiscandona balatonica ( Daday, 1894)   , Fabaeformiscandona levanderi ( Hirschmann, 1912)   and Fabaeformiscandona danielopoli Yin & Martens, 1997   . The wide calcified inner lamella in the anteroventral area of the female valves of Fabaeformiscandona monticulus   n. sp. is a feature not seen to such an extent in the other species; it is also wide here in F. levanderi   but not as wide as in Fabaeformiscandona monticulus   n. sp. and it does not have an almost straight edge in F. levanderi   . Males of all three species are sufficiently different in carapace and Hp morphologies to clearly distinguish them from Fabaeformiscandona monticulus   n. sp. In particular the lobe a of the Hp of Fabaeformiscandona monticulus   n. sp. is very large and triangular, much larger than the a lobes of the other species, and the posterior margin of the male more evenly rounded.

The arrangement of 4+1+β setae on the inner edge of the second Md palp segment indicates that Fabaeformiscandona monticulus   n. sp. belongs to the acuminata -group of Fabaeformiscandona   , the same as F. levanderi   and F. danielopoli   , but different to F. balatonica   ( balatonica   -group).

The polygonal pattern on the posterior part of the female carapace is a feature shared by some other Candonidae   , such as Fabaeformiscandona myllaina Smith & Kamiya, 2007   , Neglecandona angulata (G.W. Müller, 1900)   , Candona muelleri jakutica Pietrzeniuk, 1977   , and Candona xizangensis Huang, 1982   (in Huang et al. 1982).

Although in a different genus, Candona xizangensis   , also reported from the Tibetan Plateau, shows some similarity to Fabaeformiscandona monticulus   n. sp. in overall carapace shape and the presence of a polygonal pattern in the female carapace (see figs in Akita et al. 2016). The female of C. xizangensis   is more tightly curved posteriorly and the postero-dorsal margin longer than those in Fabaeformiscandona monticulus   n. sp. The male carapaces of both species are similar, but the male of C. xizangensis   is slightly more rounded posteriorly, and has a small convex expansion in the mouth region (absent in Fabaeformiscandona monticulus   n. sp.). The appendages of C. xizangensis   remain unknown, hindering further comparisons and confirmation of its generic status.

Fabaeformiscandona monticulus   n. sp. was collected once during this study, from a pond with sparse aquatic plants near the shore at an altitude of 4207 m ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ).