Thinodromus (s. str.) improcerus Gildenkov, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25221/fee.423.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FB4C8485-BEB2-43B9-B2E5-490C39156AB7 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A8253E11-07DB-4573-AD21-AF19935CDB4C |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:A8253E11-07DB-4573-AD21-AF19935CDB4C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Thinodromus (s. str.) improcerus Gildenkov |
status |
sp. nov. |
Thinodromus (s. str.) improcerus Gildenkov View in CoL , sp. n.
http://zoobank.org/NomenclaturalActs/ A8253E11-07DB-4573-AD21-AF19935CDB4C
Figs 1–4 View Figs 1–4
TYPE MATERIAL. Holotype – ♂, Thailand: Chayaphum Province , Tat Ton
National Park, with label “ THAILAND: 27.11.1995 Chayaphum Prov. Tat Ton NP
leg. Zettel (30)” ( NHMW). Paratype: Thailand, 1♀, with label “ THAILAND Jan .
1989 240 km NW Bangkok 110 m, leg. Thielen” (cMG).
DESCRIPTION. MALE (holotype). Length of body 2.2 mm. Dark-brown, legs and antennae yellow-brown. Integument is quite shiny, body with fairly short light-
coloured seta.
Head transverse, with a wide base, ratio of its length (from posterior margin of the head to the anterior margin of clypeus) to maximum width is about 18:29. Neck constriction is prominent. Eyes large, convex, occupying almost entire lateral side of head; temples almost indistinct, the head has the largest width in the eye area
( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 ). Head surface with clearly, rather finely and dense punctation. Diameter of punctures is about 1.5 times smaller than the eye facet. Distances between punctures are significantly smaller than their diameter, interspaces smooth, shiny
( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 ). Antennae rather long ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 ), antennal segments 1–8 elongate; segment 9
slightly elongate; segment 10 about as long as wide; segment 11 elongate, conical.
Last 3 segments more massive and form loose club.
Pronotum heart-shaped, reaches its greatest width after about 2/3 of the length measured from the base, then narrowed ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 ). Ratio of pronotum length to its maximum width is about 24:31. Surface of pronotum with clearly, rather finely and dense punctation. Diameter of punctures is about 1.5 times smaller than the eye facet. Distances between punctures are significantly smaller than their diameter,
interspaces smooth, shiny ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 ). Base of pronotal disc with distinct horseshoe-
shaped depression ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 ).
1
aedeagus, dorsal view; 3 – the same, lateral view; 4 – spermatheca, lateral view. Scale bars for figs. 2–4 = 0.25 mm.
Ratio of length of elytra to their combined width is about 38:42. Elytra with rather delicate, rather finely and dense punctation. Diameter of punctures is about
1.5 times smaller than the eye facet. Distances between punctures significantly smaller than their diameter, interspaces smooth, shiny ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 ).
Abdomen with very fine and very sparse punctation, shiny. The anterior margin of tergites III, IV, and V has 4 deep round impressions.
Aedeagus of a characteristic structure ( Figs 2, 3 View Figs 1–4 ).
FEMALE (paratype). Length 2.2 mm. Sexual dimorphism absent, female mor-
phologically is similar to male. Spermatheca as in Fig. 4 View Figs 1–4 .
DIAGNOSIS. The species is distinguished by its small size, clear and dense punctation of the head and pronotum and the presence of four deep rounded depressions on the anterior margin of tergites III, IV and V ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 ). Reliably new species is distinguished from all known species of Thinodromus by the structure of the aedeagus
3
ETYMOLOGY. From the Latin “ improcerus ” – “small”, the name is associated with small size.
NHMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.