Apolysis bicolor ( Efflatoun, 1945 ) Gibbs, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.863.2081 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:10981377-CCE7-4487-A415-4E409E55A507 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8291105 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE3F8791-FF2B-4C8F-FDE6-3A5ED7B1E692 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Apolysis bicolor ( Efflatoun, 1945 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Apolysis bicolor ( Efflatoun, 1945) View in CoL comb. nov.
Usia bicolor Efflatoun, 1945: 206 View in CoL .
Usia efflatouni Venturi, 1948: 129 View in CoL (new replacement name, preoccupied by bicolor Macquart, 1855 View in CoL when in Usia View in CoL ).
Type material (not examined)
Syntypes
EGYPT • 2 ♀♀; “Kewal El Nedayet (S.E. Desert), 23 February 1938 ( Efflatoun 1945)”; ESEC .
Photographs indicate that both are destroyed or almost so.
Remarks
Because Efflatoun (1945) described this species from two females only, and the key uses characters that are highly likely to be variable (leg colour), identifying any non-type material with A. bicolor is exceedingly problematical.
None of the specimens available to me can confidently be assigned to this species, although some are exceedingly close, agreeing in nearly all features. It seems clear that this tiny fly with very short mesonotal vestiture has many of the characters of Apolysis but few characters that would point towards Parageron s. lat. The illustration of the head laterally in Efflatoun (1945: pl. 19 fig. 303) clearly seems to show the apico-dorsal arista diagnostic of Apolysis . This tiny feature, often going unnoticed by former workers, and difficult to see even in specimens under the microscope, could be dismissed as an artefact. However, in pls 19–21, where heads of certain Apolysis are depicted this arista is apparent, but where certain Protypusia gen. nov. are depicted it is absent. In some illustrations the basal sensilla can be seen (e.g., pl. 20 figs 322, 327, Usia (Micrusia) ignorata Becker ) illustrated quite differently to the apical arista of Apolysis . At the time, Apolysis included only species lacking vein m-m, species with this crossvein being placed in Oligodranes or Usia and the taxonomic importance of the articulating arista had not been recognised. It would seem that even if Efflatoun was unaware of the value of this character, such was his attention to detail that he illustrated it.
Judging from the type description and the plate in the Smithsonian Institution Archives [Image no. SIA2012-7879], specimens from Israel that were examined are very close to this species and certainly belong in Apolysis , and so I am confident A. bicolor should also be placed there.
This action causes the preoccupation of Oligodranes bicolor Melander, 1946 , currently in Apolysis , so a new replacement name for the former is erected in the next section.
Distribution
Egypt (Kewal El Nedayet, Southeast Desert)
ESEC |
Entomological Society of Egypt |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Apolysis bicolor ( Efflatoun, 1945 )
Gibbs, David 2023 |
Usia efflatouni
Venturi F. 1948: 129 |
Usia bicolor
Efflatoun H. C. 1945: 206 |