Turbonilla megascymna, S, Absalão, Ricardo Silva, Santos, Franklin Noel & Oliveira, Deusinete, 2003
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.156627 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6273678 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EF51242A-E250-FF9F-FEA1-2307498D4DA6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Turbonilla megascymna |
status |
sp. nov. |
Turbonilla megascymna View in CoL n. sp. ( Figs. 47 View FIGURES 1 7. 1 3 )
Description: Shell small, conical to subcylindrical, fragile, white, lustrous. Teleoconch whorls strictly convex. Suture well impressed, oblique, almost straight. Protoconch heterostrophic, planispiral with nucleus partially immersed in teleoconch, diameter 323 m in holotype. Axial ribs stout, moderately low, orthocline, about 16 on body whorl of holotype; interspaces as wide as ribs or narrower, disappearing at periphery of last whorl. Spiral ridges of minute pits present over axial ribs and interspaces on the subsutural region, only visible under very high magnification. Base rounded. Aperture ovalpyriform. Columella arcuate. Outer lip fine. No umbilical fissure.
Dimensions: Holotype with 4.5 teleoconch whorls; height 2.3 mm; width 0.6 mm.
Type material: Holotype IBUFRJ 12703. Paratype UFPE 4440, Paratype MORG 41057. All paratypes from 08º42’S 34º44’W, # 15 REVIZEE, 465 m depth, Rv. “Natureza” coll., off Pernambuco State, northeast coast of Brazil, 25/iii/2000.
Type locality: 06º57’32”S 34º29’22”W, #7 REVIZEE, 750 m depth, Rv. “Natureza” coll., off Paraíba State, northeast coast of Brazil, 29/xi/2001.
Distribution: Restricted to the Northeast Brazilian coast from between Pernambuco (08o S) and Paraíba States (6o S).
Etymology: From megascymna is composed by two parts: mega (L) for large, and scymna (L.) an allusion to a young animal = protoconch, in reference to the large size of the protoconch.
Remarks: Turbonilla enna Bartsch in Dall, 1927, (Pimenta & Absalão in press: fig. 35 [holotype]) is the most similar species in the western Atlantic to T. megascymna . However, T. megascymna has more convex whorls with lower and lessdefined axial ribs than T. enna . Moreover, T. enna has interspaces as wide as the ribs, and the ribs stop abruptly at the periphery of body whorl while in T. megascymna the interspaces are twice or more as wide as the ribs, and the axial ribs disappear at the base. Finally, the protoconch of T. megascymna is significantly larger than that of T. enna .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |