Family
VALVULINIDAE Berthelin, 1880
View in CoL
corrugata
,
Clavulina
–Deshayes, 1830a-EncyMeth: 242; 1833a: pl. 4, figs 12-14 [not in table]. — Type localities: Parnes & Mouchy. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian). — Current status: regarded as nomen oblitum under ICZN Code Art. 23.9 in favor of
Gyrovalvulina columnatortilis
(d’Orbigny, in Guérin-Méneville, 1832) [
Valvulina
] (WFD).
irregularis
,
Clavulina
– Deshayes, 1830a-EncyMeth: 242. — Type locality: Grignon. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian). Preoccupies
Clavulina irregularis Roemer, 1838
, and
C. irregularis
Costa, 1856. — Current status:
Clavulina irregularis Deshayes, 1830
(WFD).
parisiensis
,
Clavulina
–Deshayes, 1830a-EncyMeth: 242, ex d’Orbigny ms. — Type localities: Mouchy-le-Châtel & Parnes. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian). Nomen nudum in d’Orbigny (1826: 268). — Current status:
Clavulina parisiensis Deshayes, 1830
(WFD).
Phylum CNIDARIA Hatschek, 1888
Family names given for each species.
brevis
View in CoL
,
Turbinolia
View in CoL
–Deshayes in Ladoucette, 1834: pl. 13, figs 1-3. — Type locality: Alpes, France. —Type age:Eocene (Priabonian).— Type material: MNHN.F.J08000, neotype. — Current status: synonym of
Trochocyathus irregularis (Deshayes, 1834) ( Milne-Edwards 1857: 45)
View in CoL
[
Caryophylliidae Dana, 1846
View in CoL
].
brevissima, Astrea
View in CoL
– Deshayes in Ladoucette, 1834: pl. 13, figs 13- 14. — Type locality: Alpes, France. — Type age: Eocene (Priabonian).
Rhizangia brevissima
View in CoL
(Deshayes in Ladoucette, 1834), the type species (monotypy) of
Rhizangia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848
View in CoL
( Milne-Edwards 1857: 611-612) [
Merulinidae Milne-Edwards & Haime, 1857
View in CoL
]. The generic name was misspelled by Deshayes in the caption as “
Astraea
View in CoL
”. Löser (2012: 8) stated that the type specimen of
A. brevissima “Deshayes, 1820
View in CoL
” [sic, 1834] is lost and that the neotype established by Barta-Calmus (1973) is not available at the former Sorbonne collection in Paris (now at the Université Pierre et Marie Curie and the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris). Baron-Szabo & Cairns (2016: 1) stated that this neotype would be invalid according to ICZN [Code] Article 75.3”. However, Barta-Calmus (1973) is an unpublished Ph.D. thesis and hence not an available publication for purposes of designating a neotype or any other nomenclatural act (ICZN Code Articles 7, 8), so that Article 75.3 does not apply (P. Bouchet & G. Rosenberg, pers. comm., August 4, 2020). — Current status:
Rhizangia brevissima
View in CoL
(Deshayes in Ladoucette, 1834) ( Löser et al. 2021: 266-269, figs 9.1-9.4).
geometrica,
Astrea
View in CoL
– Deshayes in Ladoucette, 1834: pl. 13, figs 10- 12, non Goldfuss, 1826. — Type locality: Alpes, France. — Type age: Eocene (Priabonian). Generic name misspelled in caption as “
Astraea
View in CoL
”. — Current status: synonym of
Astrocoenia numisma (Defrance, 1826)
View in CoL
[
Astrea
View in CoL
] ( Milne-Edwards, 1857: 260) [
Astrocoeniidae Koby, 1890
View in CoL
].
irregularis
View in CoL
,
Turbinolia
View in CoL
– Deshayes in Ladoucette, 1834: pl. 13, fig. 5. — Type locality: Alpes, France. — Type age: Eocene (Priabonian). — Current status:
Trochocyathus irregularis (Deshayes, 1834) ( Milne-Edwards 1857: 45)
View in CoL
[
Caryophylliidae Dana, 1846
View in CoL
].
parasiticus
View in CoL
,
Anthozoanthus
– Deshayes in Frédol, 1865: 91, pl. 4. — Type locality: none given. — Type age: Recent. Sherborn (1929: 4756) listed this as “Deshayes in Expl. Algér. (Moll.), Expl. Planches, p. 3”, but it was not published in that work. Concerning: H. J. Carter (1870). — Current status: an octocoral, synonym of
Alcyonium coralloides (Pallas, 1766)
View in CoL
[Gorgonia] (C. McFadden, pers. comm., March 24, 2020) [
Alcyoniidae Lamouroux, 1812
View in CoL
].
pediculata, Astrea
View in CoL
– Deshayes, 1831b: 256, as “
Astraea
View in CoL
”, 261, as
Astrea
View in CoL
, pl. 11, fig. 5. — Type locality: none given. — Type age: Eocene (Priabonian).
Phyllocoenia pediculata (Deshayes, 1831) ( Milne-Edwards 1857: 275-276)
View in CoL
.
Heliastraea pediculata (Deshayes, 1831) ( Oppenheim 1930: 320)
. — Current status:
Phyllocoenia pediculata (Deshayes, 1831) ( Löser 2002: 514-515)
View in CoL
[
Montastraeidae Yabe & Sugiyama, 1941
View in CoL
].
tenuistriata
,
Turbinolia
View in CoL
– Deshayes in Ladoucette, 1834: pl. 13, figs 4-6. — Type locality: Alpes, France. — Type age: Eocene (Priabonian). — Current status: synonym of
Trochocyathus irregularis (Deshayes, 1834) ( Milne-Edwards 1857: 45)
View in CoL
[
Caryophylliidae Dana, 1846
View in CoL
].
Phylum ECHINODERMATA Klein, 1778
View in CoL
Family names are given for each species.
acutus
,
Spatangus
View in CoL
– Deshayes, 1831b: 255, pl. 11, figs 5-6. — Type locality: Rouen; Upper Cretaceous. — Type species (SD Lambert, 1895) of
Epiaster d’Orbigny, 1853
View in CoL
. Stokes (2015) discussed the confusion in the 20th- century literature with multiple type species designations and determined that Lambert (1895) was the first to make this designation. — Current status: synonym of
Epiaster crassissimus Defrance, 1827
[
Spatangus
View in CoL
] (A. B. Smith & Wright 2008) [
Micrasteridae Lambert, 1920
View in CoL
].
ambulacrum
,
Spatangus
View in CoL
– Deshayes, 1831b: 255, 260, pl. 7, fig. 4. — Type locality: Pyrenees. — Type age: Oligocene (Stampian). — Type species (OD) of Brachybrissmus Pomel, 1883, now considered to be a synonym of
Schizaster Agassiz, 1836
View in CoL
[
Schizasteridae Lambert, 1905
View in CoL
] ( Lambert & Thiery 1924: 527). — Current status:
Schizaster ambulacrum (Deshayes, 1831)
.
●
Agassiz & Desor (1846, 1847a, 1847b) described a number of fossil echinoderms, including some from Algeria, which they attributed to Deshayes. Although the “Géologie” volume of the Exploration scientifique de l’Algérie includes a title page listing a chapter by Deshayes, this chapter was never published. One of us (Kabat) has seen (in a private collection) several hand-colored plates of fossil echinoids from Algeria, including some of these new species, evidently prepared for the Deshayes chapter. It is likely that Agassiz and Desor saw the Deshayes specimens and/or the illustrations, which they used in publishing their descriptions of the Algerian fossils first identified by Deshayes. While these names are credited to Deshayes, the brief descriptions have no indication that Deshayes was involved in their preparation. The material seems to be from collections made by Deshayes in Algeria. Although some subsequent authors (e.g., Cotteau et al. 1881: 58, 88; Lambert & Thiéry 1924: 280, 411, 501) attributed these species to Deshayes, they should be attributed solely to “Agassiz & Desor.”
africanus
,
Hemipneustes
View in CoL
– Agassiz & Desor, 1847b: 31, ex Deshayes ms. — Current status:
Hemipneustes africanus Agassiz & Desor, 1847
[
Hemipneustidae Lambert, 1917
View in CoL
].
costulatus
,
Nucleolites
View in CoL
– Agassiz & Desor, 1847a: 155, ex Deshayes ms. The material seems to be in part from collections made by Deshayes in Algeria [
Nucleolitidae
View in CoL
].
delamarrei
,
Cyphosoma
View in CoL
– Agassiz & Desor, 1846: 352, ex Deshayes ms. — Type species (SD Lambert & Thiéry 1911) of
Rachiosoma Pomel, 1883
View in CoL
. — Current status:
Rachiosoma delamarrei ( Agassiz & Desor, 1846)
(A. B. Smith & Wright 1996: 290, text-fig. 101) [
Glyphocyphidae Duncan, 1889
View in CoL
].
fourneli
,
Hemiaster
View in CoL
– Agassiz & Desor, 1847b: 17-18, ex Deshayes ms. — Type species (OD) of
Mecaster Pomel, 1883
View in CoL
. — Current status:
Mecaster fourneli (Agassiz & Desor, 1847)
(A. B. Smith, in A. B. Smith & Bengtson 1991: 61-62) [
Hemiasteridae H. L. Clark, 1917
View in CoL
].
renouxii,
Micraster
View in CoL
– Agassiz & Desor, 1847b: 23, ex Deshayes ms. The material seems to be from collections made by Deshayes in Algeria [
Micrasteridae Lambert, 1920
View in CoL
].
rostratus
,
Holaster
View in CoL
– Agassiz, 1840: 1, ex Deshayes ms. Nomen nudum [
Holasteridae Pictet, 1857
View in CoL
].
roulini,
Holaster
View in CoL
– Agassiz, 1840: 1, ex Deshayes ms. Nomen nudum [
Holasteridae Pictet, 1857
View in CoL
].
serialis
,
Holectypus
View in CoL
– Agassiz & Desor, 1847a: 146, ex Deshayes ms. Indeed, the text, which contains no diagnosis or description, could be interpreted as establishing a nomen nudum. The material seems to be from collections made by Deshayes in Algeria. — Current status:
Coenoholectypus serialis (Agassiz & Desor, 1847) ( Rose & Olver 1985: 84)
[
Holectypidae Lambert, 1900
View in CoL
].
Phylum BRACHIOPODA Duméril, 1805
View in CoL
Megarima – Deshayes, 1832-EncyMeth: 421. Incorrect subsequent spelling of Megorima Rafinesque, 1818, a genus of uncertain status.