Coptocheilus Gould, 1862
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0061 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A6D5A0AF-C338-4902-BEB7-A6D9DAE75AB5 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EF7E0340-9807-FFC9-44B8-BA30660CF7C3 |
|
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
|
scientific name |
Coptocheilus Gould, 1862 |
| status |
|
Coptocheilus Gould, 1862 View in CoL
Coptocheilus Gould, 1862: 282 View in CoL . Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902: 298 View in CoL (nom. nov. pro Coptocheilus View in CoL
Gould, 1862). Pinteria Varga, 1972: 134 View in CoL (type species: Pinteria croesus Varga,
1972, by original designation).
Type species. Cyclostoma altum G.B. Sowerby I, 1842 , by original designation.
Remarks. Kobelt (1902) established Schistoloma as a nom. nov. for Coptocheilus Gould, 1862 , claiming that it is a junior homonym of Coptochilus Amyot & Serville, 1843 ( Insecta: Hemiptera ). However, Coptocheilus Gould, 1862 , is not a junior homonym of Coptochilus Amyot & Serville, 1843 , based on the one letter difference (see Article 56.2 of the International Code of the Zoological Nomenclature, hereafter the Code [ICZN, 1999]), thus Kobelt’s replacement name is unnecessary. Coptochilus F. Sandberger, 1871 , is also considered to be an unjustified emendation of Coptocheilus Gould, 1862 . A reversal of precedence (Article 23.9 of the Code) cannot be used to conserve the widely used Schistoloma because Coptocheilus has been used as valid after 1899 (e.g., Fulton, 1903; Bartsch, 1909).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
Coptocheilus Gould, 1862
| Bui, Chinh Thi & Páll-Gergely, Barna 2020 |
Coptocheilus
| Kobelt W 1902: 298 |
| Gould AA 1862: 282 |