Trogloplax Guinot, 1986

Ng, Peter K. L. & Castro, Peter, 2016, Revision of the family Chasmocarcinidae Serène, 1964 (Crustacea, Brachyura, Goneplacoidea), Zootaxa 4209 (1), pp. 1-182 : 131-134

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4209.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:849BAB5C-464A-4B4A-A586-5742411EDC01

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617263

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F16BFB33-FF21-FF7E-FF6A-F991FCA0F9F5

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Trogloplax Guinot, 1986
status

 

Genus Trogloplax Guinot, 1986 View in CoL

Trogloplax Guinot, 1986: 308 View in CoL ; 1988: 27.— Jamieson & Guinot 1996: 289.—Ng et al. 2008: 76 [in list].— De Grave et al. 2009: 33 [in list].—Castro et al. 2010: 41 (part).— Guinot et al. 2013: 42, 113.

Type species. Trogloplax joliveti Guinot, 1986 (by monotypy, gender feminine)

Diagnosis. Carapace ( Fig. 93 View FIGURE 93 E–H; Guinot 1986: pl. 1, fig. A, B; pl. 2, fig. A; 1988: pl. 4, fig. 1, 5, fig. 17A) transversely oval, front bilobed, with shallow median cleft; anterolateral margins arcuate, with shallow, undulating crest lacking defined teeth. Epistome ( Fig. 94 View FIGURE 94 E, F; Guinot 1986: pl. 2, fig. B; 1988: fig. 16A) narrow, posterior margin with short, semicircular median lobe with median fissure, semicircular lateral margins. Eye peduncle ( Fig. 94 View FIGURE 94 E, F; Guinot 1988: fig. 16) reduced, not filling orbit, mobile; cornea reduced, non-pigmented. Third maxillipeds ( Fig. 94 View FIGURE 94 J; Guinot 1986: pl. 2, fig. B; 1988: fig. 17B) leaving gap when closed; merus quadrate, anteroexternal angle rounded; ischium quadrate, about same length as merus. Chelipeds ( Figs. 93 View FIGURE 93 E, H; 95G, H; Guinot 1986: pl. 1, fig. C–E; 1987: pl. 2, fig. H, I; 1988: pl. 4, fig. 2–4, 6–8) subequal in length, slightly dissimilar in both sexes; cutting margins of major chelae with small teeth in both sexes; fingers of minor chela ( Fig. 95 View FIGURE 95 H) subcircular in crosssection, not laterally flattened, gently tapering to tip, shear-like, cutting margins with few low teeth; anterior margin of dorsal surface of propodi with large tooth; inner margin of cheliped carpus ( Fig. 95 View FIGURE 95 G, H; Guinot 1987: pl. 2, fig. H, I) with conspicuously long tooth, inner margins of meri ( Fig. 95 View FIGURE 95 G, H; Guinot 1987: pl. 2, fig. H, I) with 1, 2 pointed teeth, outer margins with 3 tubercles in male holotype. Proportionally long ambulatory legs ( Fig. 93 View FIGURE 93 E, G, H), P5 merus reaching front when folded. Meri of ambulatory legs unarmed. Fused thoracic sternites 1, 2 ( Fig. 97 View FIGURE 97 A, B, D; Guinot 1986: pl. 2, fig. C; 1988: fig. 17C; Guinot et al. 2013: fig. 24A) broadly triangular, long; fused sternites 3, 4 relatively broad. Male pleon ( Fig. 97 View FIGURE 97 A–C; Guinot 1988: fig. 17F) with lateral margins of somite 6, fused somites 3‒5 nearly straight; postero-lateral regions only slightly swollen; telson proportionally short. Sternopleonal cavity of male deep. Press-button for pleonal holding as small, short tubercle posterior to thoracic sternal suture 4/5 near edge of sterno-pleonal cavity ( Fig. 98 View FIGURE 98 D). Male thoracic sternite 8 ( Figs. 97 View FIGURE 97 C, E; Guinot 1986: pl. 2, fig. D; 1988: fig. 17D) proportionally long, rectangular; “supplementary plate” conspicuously narrow, only reaching median portion of exposed thorax, short, slightly longer at rounded outer margin. G1 ( Fig. 98 View FIGURE 98 E, G, H; Guinot 1986: pl. 2, fig. E, F, F1; 1988: fig. 17E; Guinot et al. 2013: fig. 24B) stout, distal part with tapering tip, covered with short spinules. G2 ( Fig. 98 View FIGURE 98 F, J; Guinot 1986: pl. 2, fig. G) as long as or longer than G1, basal segment curved; distal segment slightly longer than basal segment, apex with lateral pointed tip. Somites of female pleon ( Fig. 99 View FIGURE 99 G) with slightly convex lateral margins; telson proportionally long. Sterno-pleonal cavity of female ( Fig. 99 View FIGURE 99 H) moderately deep, with conspicuously large vulvae widely separated, covering full extent of thoracic sternite 5, round, thin, raised lip on outer margin, soft membrane across, leaving proportionally small opening.

Remarks. The G2 of T. joliveti is as long as ( Fig. 98 View FIGURE 98 E, F) or longer than the G1 ( Fig. 98 View FIGURE 98 G, J), and similar to the two species of Australocarcinus (the second trogloplacine genus) where males are known, where the G2 is distinctly longer than the G1 ( Fig. 98 View FIGURE 98 A–D) (see below). Guinot (1996: 308) described the G2 of T. joliveti as “plus développé” than the G 1 in the diagnosis of the genus, but her illustration of the gonopods of the holotype (reproduced in Fig. 98 View FIGURE 98 E, G) shows that both are about the same size.

Guinot (1986: pl. 2C; see fig. 97D) illustrated a suture 2/3 of the thoracic sternum of Trogloplax as laterally interrupted with only the median part visible. This, however, is not the case as the lateral parts of suture 2/3, although shallow, are still visible ( Fig. 97 View FIGURE 97 A, B).

Distribution. Indo-West Pacific region: Papua New Guinea.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Chasmocarcinidae

Loc

Trogloplax Guinot, 1986

Ng, Peter K. L. & Castro, Peter 2016
2016
Loc

Trogloplax

Guinot 2013: 42
De 2009: 33
Jamieson 1996: 289
Guinot 1986: 308
1986
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF