Chasmocarcinus

Ng, Peter K. L. & Castro, Peter, 2016, Revision of the family Chasmocarcinidae Serène, 1964 (Crustacea, Brachyura, Goneplacoidea), Zootaxa 4209 (1), pp. 1-182 : 13-14

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4209.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:849BAB5C-464A-4B4A-A586-5742411EDC01

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617052

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F16BFB33-FFAF-FFF6-FF6A-F815FA51FBC0

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Chasmocarcinus
status

 

Key to species of Chasmocarcinus View in CoL

1. Western Atlantic (Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea to Brazil) in distribution....................................... 2

- Tropical Eastern Pacific (Lower California to Peru) in distribution............................................. 8

2. Anterolateral margins of carapace smooth, without conspicuous tubercles, convex (e.g., Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 A).................... 3

- Anterolateral margins of carapace elevated, with conspicuous tubercles, granules, or setose ridge (e.g., Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 C).........4

3. Anterior third portion of carapace proportionally narrow, anterior margin conspicuously narrower than median portion ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A‒D). Fingers of major chela of large males elongated, dactylus clearly longer than propodus ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 A, C), curved in dorsal view ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 A, B). Third maxilliped ischium elongated ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 A‒C) [West Indies to Brazil]................. C. typicus View in CoL

- Anterior third portion of carapace nearly as wide as median portion ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 A, B). Fingers of major chela of large males not elongated, dactylus only slightly longer than propodus ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 I), straight in dorsal view ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 A, B); third maxilliped ischium rectangular ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 F) [Gulf of Mexico]............................................................ C. chacei View in CoL

4. Dorsal surface of chelipeds with conspicuous setae ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 G). Anterolateral margins of carapace with low, setose ridge ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 H) [ Brazil]............................................................................... C. hirsutipes View in CoL

- Dorsal surface of chelipeds smooth or with sparse setae or smooth (e.g., Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 E). Anterolateral margin of carapace with conspicuously raised, granular ridge, row of setae absent (e.g., Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 C, D)......................................... 5

5. Fingers of major chela of large males arched, leaving wide, circular gap ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 E), curved in dorsal view (Coelho & Coelho 1998: figs. 1a, 2c). Dorsal surface of cheliped propodus of large males eroded ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 E) [ Brazil]............. C. arcuatus View in CoL

- Fingers of major chela of large males straight or slightly curved, not leaving wide, circular gap (e.g., Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 K). Dorsal surface of cheliped propodus of large males smooth............................................................... 6

6. Carapace proportionally wide along anterior third, almost as wide as posterior portion ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 C‒E) [Florida and West Indies to Brazil]................................................................................... C. cylindricus View in CoL

- Carapace conspicuously narrower along anterior third than posterior portion (e.g., Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 G).......................... 7

7. Orbits, eye peduncles proportionally short ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 D). Male telson proportionally short, broad ( Fig. 50 View FIGURE 50 E) [ Brazil]........................................................................................................ C. meloi View in CoL

- Orbits, eye peduncles proportionally long ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 E). Male telson proportionally long, narrow ( Fig. 50 View FIGURE 50 F) [Gulf of Mexico].......................................................................................... C. mississipiensis View in CoL

8. Ambulatory legs proportionally short, merus wide, stout (e.g., Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A). Fingers of major chela of large males almost straight ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 E, G) [Gulf of California to Peru]............................................................ C. latipes View in CoL

- Ambulatory legs proportionally long, merus slender ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 F). Fingers of major chela of large males gently or prominently curved (e.g., Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 A)................................................................................. 9

9. Pterygostomial region prominent, bulging, clearly visible from dorsal view ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 C). Fingers of major chela of large males prominently curved, slender, long ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 A) [Pacific coast of Costa Rica]......................... C. gemmatus View in CoL n. sp.

- Pterygostomial region not prominent, not visible from dorsal view ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 F). Fingers of major chela of large males relatively short, slightly curved ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 I) [Pacific coast of Costa Rica to Ecuador]................................. C. longipes View in CoL

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF