Amboplax, Ng, Peter K. L. & Castro, Peter, 2016

Ng, Peter K. L. & Castro, Peter, 2016, Revision of the family Chasmocarcinidae Serène, 1964 (Crustacea, Brachyura, Goneplacoidea), Zootaxa 4209 (1), pp. 1-182 : 27-28

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4209.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:849BAB5C-464A-4B4A-A586-5742411EDC01

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617078

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F16BFB33-FFB9-FFE0-FF6A-FA55FD00FA24

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Amboplax
status

gen. nov.

Genus Amboplax View in CoL n. gen.

Chasmocarcinus Coelho & Coelho 1998: 799 View in CoL (part); Melo 1996: 419 (part).

Type species. Chasmocarcinus peresi Rodrigues da Costa, 1968 (by monotypy, gender feminine)

Diagnosis. Carapace ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 A, B; Rodrigues da Costa 1968: unnumb. pl., fig. 1) subtrapezoidal, high; front bilobed, with shallow median cleft; anterolateral margins arcuate, with conspicuous granular ridge. Epistome ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 F) slightly depressed, posterior margin with salient, subtriangular median lobe with median fissure, lateral margins broad, straight. Antennular articles relatively short ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 F). Orbits proportionally wide, proportionally short eye peduncles ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 F, G) that do not fill orbit. Suborbital ridge ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 G) below orbital margin. Third maxillipeds ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 H) do not fill buccal cavern when closed; merus broadly ovate; ischium broad, quadrate, slightly longer than merus. Pterygostomial region bulging, clearly visible from dorsal view. Chelipeds subequal in length, slightly dissimilar in female, heteromorphic in males. Fingers of major chela ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 E; Rodrigues da Costa 1968: unnumb. pl., fig. 3) proportionally short, slightly shorter than propodus in dorsal view; pollex as long as dactylus; cutting margins with several low teeth, outer submarginal part with stiff setae which do not obscure margin. Minor male chela ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 F) slender; fingers subcircular in cross-section, scissor-like; cutting margins blade-like, with 3 short spines on distal quarter, short submedian spine on each finger, submarginal part lined with dense row of short setae that obscure margin. Female major chela more slender than male, submarginal row of setae less evident; female minor chela similar to male except short spines on cutting margin of pollex relatively smaller. Inner margin of cheliped carpus smooth ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 A, B; Rodrigues da Costa 1968: unnumb. pl., fig. 1); ventral surface of cheliped merus smooth, without teeth. Proportionally short ambulatory legs, folded P5 merus only reaching middle portion of anterolateral margin ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 A, B; Rodrigues da Costa 1968: unnumb. pl., fig. 1), meri with microscopic granules along posterior margin, unarmed. P5 dactylus upcurved, spur-like subdistal extension absent. Fused thoracic sternites 1, 2 ( Figs. 50 View FIGURE 50 G; 85C) broadly triangular, short; fused thoracic sternites 3, 4 ( Figs. 50 View FIGURE 50 G; 85C) relatively broad. Male pleon ( Figs. 50 View FIGURE 50 G; 57D; Rodrigues da Costa 1968: fig. 2) with rectangular somite 6, fused somites 3–5 convex; telson conspicuously proportionally long, narrow. Sterno-pleonal cavity of male deep, Press-button for pleonal holding as small, short tubercle posterior to thoracic sternal suture 4/5 at edge of sternopleonal cavity. Male thoracic sternite 8 ( Fig. 57 View FIGURE 57 D) short, quadrate; “supplementary plate” short, rectangular; structures tightly appressed with most of penis concealed. G1 ( Fig. 66 View FIGURE 66 D, E; Rodrigues da Costa 1968: fig. 4) stout, straight, distal segment with spinules. G2 ( Fig. 66 View FIGURE 66 F) about 3/4 G1 length, straight, slender, distal segment long, slightly curved. Somites of female pleon ( Fig. 85 View FIGURE 85 C) with convex lateral margins; telson proportionally short. Sterno-pleonal cavity of female ( Fig. 89 View FIGURE 89 I) shallow, vulvae conspicuously close together on anterior margin of thoracic sternite 6 close to suture 5/6.

Etymology. The name is derived from the arbitrary combination of ambon, Greek for “crest” and “ridge”, in reference to the suborbital ridge of the type species, a character unique for Chasmocarcinidae .

Remarks. Amboplax n. gen. is described for Chasmocarcinus peresi Rodrigues da Costa, 1968, a very distinctive species that can be easily separated from other chasmocarcinids by several important characters. One is the presence of a suborbital ridge (“suborbital carina” of Coelho & Coelho 1989: 813) below and subparallel to the suborbital margin of the orbit. This suborbital ridge is actually an extension of the inner edge of the suborbital margin that forms a separate, narrow transverse shelf-like structure on the suborbital region ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 G). Also unique are the short and stout G1 ( Fig. 66 View FIGURE 66 D, E; Rodrigues da Costa 1968: fig. 4), vulvae that are located close together ( Fig. 89 View FIGURE 89 I) in contrast to being farther apart as in other chasmocarcinines, orbits that are slightly wider (“oblique” in Rodrigues da Costa’s 1968 description) ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 F) than in Chasmocarcinus , and the long, straight lateral margins of the epistome ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 F, G), typically circular in Chasmocarcinus . The press-button for pleonal holding of Amboplax peresi sits right at the edge of the anterior part of sternite 5, just before suture 4/5, in contrast to Chasmocarcinus , where the press-button is inside the sterno-pleonal cavity below the rim of the cavity.

The structure of the minor chela in A. peresi closely resembles that of some species of Camatopsis (e.g., C. rubida and C. africana n. sp.; Fig. 38 View FIGURE 38 B, D, F, H, J) in that the cutting margins are blade-like, with sharp teeth along the distal quarter and lined with short setae, and the distal part of at least the pollex has sharp spines (e.g., Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 F). The minor chela of A. peresi superficially resembles that of Chasmocarcinus chacei in that the cutting margin of the pollex only has low teeth and the distal quarter has a few small spines ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 J). The margins and submarginal parts, however, are not lined with setae in C. chacei .

Distribution. Western Atlantic region: Brazil.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Chasmocarcinidae

Loc

Amboplax

Ng, Peter K. L. & Castro, Peter 2016
2016
Loc

Chasmocarcinus

Melo 1996: 419
1996
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF