Chinommatia littoralis ( Tesch, 1918 ) Tesch, 1918
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4209.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:849BAB5C-464A-4B4A-A586-5742411EDC01 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617155 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F16BFB33-FFE6-FFBE-FF6A-FE0DFB64FA17 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chinommatia littoralis ( Tesch, 1918 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Chinommatia littoralis ( Tesch, 1918) View in CoL n. comb.
( Figs. 15 View FIGURE 15 A; 25E; 32C; 43H)
Hephthopelta littoralis Tesch, 1918: 233 View in CoL , pl. 9, fig. 3 [type localilty: Indonesia] .— Serène 1968: 92 [in list].— Zarenkov 1972: 238, figs. 1–4 [Vietnam]. — Jiang 2008: 770 [in list] [South China Sea].—Ng et al. 2008: 76 [in list].
Not Hephthopelta View in CoL littoralis— Chen 1998: 298, fig. 22 [Nansha Is, 53‒105 m]. [= Chinommatia cavimanus View in CoL ( Rathbun, 1914]
Type material. Holotype female (3.5 × 4.9 mm) (NNM-ZMA), Indonesia, north coast of Ceram , Waru Bay, Siboga Expedition , stn 174, 18 m, 0 7.1899.
Diagnosis. Carapace ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 A; Tesch 1918: pl. 9, fig. 3, as Hephthopelta littoralis ) subtrapezoidal, convex, short tomentum, 1.4 wider than long in female holotype; front nearly straight; anterolateral margins arcuate, minutely granular with granules higher along lateral margins, without distinct lobes or teeth. Eye peduncle ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 E) long. Epistome ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 E) with semicircular median lobe, semicircular lateral margins. Third maxilliped ( Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 C; Zarenkov 1972: fig. 1– 4III, as H. littoralis ) merus ovate, anteroexternal angle rounded; ischium rectangular, slightly longer than merus. Proportionally short ambulatory legs ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 A), with short tomentum ( Tesch 1918: pl. 9, fig. 3, as H. littoralis ). Fingers of minor chela of female holotype ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 H) subcircular in cross-section, scissorlike, cutting margins with short teeth. Inner margin of cheliped carpus with short tooth ( Tesch 1918: pl. 9, fig. 3, as H. littoralis ; Zarenkov 1972: fig. 1– 4I, as H. littoralis ). Fused thoracic sternites 1, 2 semicircular, proportionally narrow, long. Male, adult female unknown.
Remarks. The holotype specimen is a small female, but in all key characters, it appears to be a species of Chinommatia n. gen. Zarenkov (1972) reported “ Hephthopelta littoralis ” from the South China Sea , and it agrees well with the type, although his specimen is depicted with teeth on the cheliped meri rather than tubercles ( Zarenkov 1972: fig. 1– 4I). They otherwise agree in the form of the carapace, long eye peduncles, and the morphology of the third maxillipeds, and thus we believe they are conspecific. The shallow-water record of Zarenkov’s South China Sea material (10–72 m) also supports their conspecificity (the type was from 18 m). The male pleon, chelae, and gonopod features as figured by Zarenkov (1972) support the inclusion of the species in Chinommatia n. gen.
Distribution. Western Pacific Ocean ( Indonesia and South China Sea). Depth: 10– 72 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chinommatia littoralis ( Tesch, 1918 )
Ng, Peter K. L. & Castro, Peter 2016 |
Hephthopelta
Chen 1998: 298 |
Hephthopelta littoralis
Jiang 2008: 770 |
Zarenkov 1972: 238 |
Serene 1968: 92 |
Tesch 1918: 233 |