Microtopsis teschi, Ng, Peter K. L. & Castro, Peter, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4209.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:849BAB5C-464A-4B4A-A586-5742411EDC01 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617211 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F16BFB33-FFF6-FFAD-FF6A-F91FFC64FBC5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Microtopsis teschi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Microtopsis teschi View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs. 18 View FIGURE 18 B, C; 80C–F; 81G–N)
Camatopsis rubida Forma B—Tesch 1918: 235 (part) [ Indonesia] (other Forma B specimens = Camatopsis minor n. sp.).
Type material. Holotype male (1.5 × 2.1 mm) (NNM-ZMA), Indonesia, northwest of Kei Is. , Siboga Expedition , stn 260, 90 m, 0 7.1899.
Paratype: 1 male (1.5 × 1.9 mm) (NNM-ZMA), collected with holotype.
Diagnosis. Carapace ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 B, C) subtrapezoidal, 1.3‒1.4 wider than long; front bilobed, with shallow median cleft; anterolateral margins arcuate, minutely granular, without distinct lobes or teeth, those on anterior part spiniform; dorsal surface covered with minute granules, more prominent on lateral surfaces. Epistome slightly depressed; posterior margin with widely semicircular median lobe with median fissure, semicircular lateral margins without fissures. Eye peduncle filling orbit, proportionally long, mobile; cornea reduced, pigmented. Third maxillipeds ( Fig. 80 View FIGURE 80 C, D) apparently not filling buccal cavern when closed (left maxillipeds incomplete); merus subcircular, anteroexternal angle rounded; ischium subquadrate, about same length as merus. Chelipeds subequal in length, slightly heteromorphic in males; cutting margin of pollex of larger chela with dense short setae, less prominent on minor chela; ventral surface of cheliped merus almost smooth. Meri of ambulatory legs unarmed; proportionally long, slender dactyli; P5 merus 0.6 cl. Fused thoracic sternites 1, 2 broadly triangular, proportionally narrow, long; fused sternites 3, 4 relatively broad. Male pleon ( Fig. 80 View FIGURE 80 F) broad, subtriangular, telson proportionally short. G1 ( Fig. 81 View FIGURE 81 G‒L) relatively stout, longer, median part distinctly twisted, distal part slightly twisted, distal segment with short, spirally arranged spinules. G2 ( Fig. 81 View FIGURE 81 M, N) straight, slender, distal segment with short, flaplike apex, almost as long as G1. Female unknown.
Etymology. The species is named after J. J. Tesch, whose seminal work on the Siboga goneplacoids has been so important in our study.
Remarks. This new species resembles M. takedai , but can easily be distinguished by the form of the carapace, male pleon, and G1 structure. In M. teschi n. sp., the dorsal surface of the carapace is covered with distinct small granules ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 B, C) (surface relatively smooth in M. takedai , Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 A), the anterior part of the lateral carapace margin has short spiniform granules ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 B, C) (granules lower, not spiniform in M. takedai , Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 A), the male telson is more triangular in shape ( Fig. 80 View FIGURE 80 F) (relatively more semicircular in M. takedai , Fig. 80 View FIGURE 80 B), male pleonite 6 is proportionally broader ( Fig. 80 View FIGURE 80 F) (less broad in M. takedai , Fig. 80 View FIGURE 80 B), and the G1 is proportionately longer, with the median twist more substantial and the tip more hook-shaped ( Fig. 81 View FIGURE 81 G‒L) (cf. Fig. 81 View FIGURE 81 A‒E for M. takedai ).
Microtopsis teschi n. sp. is only known from two very small but fully mature males that Tesch (1918) had identified as “ Camatopsis rubida forma B”. As discussed above, some of his B form belongs to a small-size species of Camatopsis , C. minor n. sp. The carapace of the paratype male of M. teschi n. sp. is relatively more spinular, especially along the posterolateral regions. The G1s of the two male specimens are, however, almost identical.
Distribution. Known only from Indonesia (Kei Is.). Depth: 90 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Chasmocarcininae |
Genus |