Harpalus erraticus Say, 1823
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:68FE3835-2401-43A7-96E2-CF26532F7A60 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F1927E1E-3DC9-3948-592F-3C36652ECF6D |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Harpalus erraticus Say, 1823 |
status |
|
Harpalus erraticus Say, 1823a: 27 (as eraticus). Type locality: "Medora [Reno County], K[ansa]s" (neotype label). Neotype (♂), designated by Lindroth and Freitag (1969: 352), in MCZ [# 32973]. Note. The incorrect subsequent spelling erraticus, introduced by Harris (1833: 568), is in prevailing usage and attributed to the publication of the original spelling; therefore it is deemed to be the correct original spelling (ICZN 1999: Article 33.3.1).
Harpalus caudalis Casey, 1914: 73. Type locality: "S[ain]t L[ouis], M[iss]o[uri]" (lectotype label). Lectotype (♂), designated by Lindroth (1975: 138), in USNM [# 47742]. Synonymy established by El-Moursy (1959: 41).
Distribution.
This species occurs east of the Rocky Mountains ranging from southern Quebec to southeastern Alberta, south to central New Mexico, southern Kansas, central Alabama [see Noonan 1991: Fig. 285], and southeastern South Carolina (Ciegler 2000: 100).
Records.
CAN: AB, MB, ON, QC, SK USA: AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MS, MT, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NY, OH, RI, SC, SD, TN, VT, WI
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Harpalus erraticus Say, 1823
Bousquet, Yves 2012 |
Harpalus caudalis
Casey 1914 |
Harpalus erraticus
Say 1823 |