Lacomucinaea
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1002/tax.13123 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14182335 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F275A675-2C79-4004-FF70-A34EFF466A82 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lacomucinaea |
status |
|
0. Lacomucinaea View in CoL clade (BIPP 1).
— Lacomucinaea lineata (L.f.) Nickrent & M.A.García ( Fig. 3A View Fig ), previously known as Thesium lineatum , was classified as a distinct genus by Nickrent & García (2015) based on molecular and morphological evidence. This genus is sister to Osyridicarpos and that clade is sister Thesium , relationships with the highest support from both ITS and the chloroplast genes ( Fig. 2A View Fig ). One may ask why Lacomucinaea was not included within Osyridicarpos . These two genera share several morphological features, e.g., primary phloem fiber bundles near the stem surface, bisexual flowers, lack of a swollen pedicel, and fleshy fruits with smooth exocarps. They differ in other characters such as habit (shrub vs. scrambling subshrub), leaf morphology, leaf persistence, inflorescence structure, presence of external floral gland, style length and ribbing on ovary. Four species have been described in Osyridicarpos although it is frequently treated as monotypic ( O. schimperianus ). Further studies might prove that several species should be recognized in the genus, all of them very different from Lacomucinaea . Thus, the preponderance of molecular and morphological evidence justifies recognition of two genera.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |