Gynaikothrips uzeli Zimmermann
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4861.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:499A8821-6E33-4876-8E95-A6BC495D1C39 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4426261 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F30F465D-FFE3-FFA6-BEF6-7335FC25FB49 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Gynaikothrips uzeli Zimmermann |
status |
|
Gynaikothrips uzeli Zimmermann View in CoL
( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–6 )
Gynaikothrips uzeli Zimmermann, 1900: 13 View in CoL .
Mesothrips uzeli Zimmermann, 1900: 12 View in CoL . [lapsus]
The biological and morphological similarities between Gynaikothrips ficorum View in CoL and G. uzeli View in CoL make the separation of these two species difficult. Generally, the pronotal epimeral and posteroangular setae are equally long in G. uzeli View in CoL , whereas in G. ficorum View in CoL the posteroangular setae are much shorter than the epimerals. However, there is considerable variation within and between populations ( Tree et al. 2015). Sometimes useful for distinguishing these two species is the colour of the fore wings ( Mound et al. 1995), hyaline in ficorum View in CoL but shaded in uzeli View in CoL , and the presence on tergite III of 5–6 pairs of accessary setae in ficorum View in CoL but of 7–8 pairs in uzeli View in CoL .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Gynaikothrips uzeli Zimmermann
Wang, Chin-Ling & Lin, Feng-Chyi 2020 |
Gynaikothrips uzeli
Zimmermann, A. 1900: 13 |
Mesothrips uzeli
Zimmermann, A. 1900: 12 |