Euphoria Burmeister, 1842
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-066X-66.mo4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:152ACEBB-EA3F-4EF3-BC95-1F7593D01D66 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7092750 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F449F723-D52B-B265-8418-41C4ECE0FD3C |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Euphoria Burmeister, 1842 |
status |
|
Euphoria Burmeister, 1842 View in CoL
Euphoria Burmeister 1842: 370 View in CoL .
Type species: Cetonia sepulcralis F., designated by Casey (1915).
Erirhipi s Burmeister 1842: 385 View in CoL . Synonym.
Type species: Cetonia fulgida F., designated by Casey (1915).
Stephanucha Burmeister 1842: 385 View in CoL . Synonym.
Type species: Cetonia areata F., by monotypy.
Goraqua Péringuey 1907: 358 View in CoL . Synonym.
Type species: Goraqua smithsana Péringuey , by monotypy.
Anatropis Casey 1915: 298 View in CoL . Synonym.
Type species: Euphoria verticalis Horn , by monotypy.
Euphoriaspis Casey 1915: 298 View in CoL . Synonym.
Type species: Euphoria hirtipes Horn , by monotypy.
Euphoriopsis Casey 1915: 298 View in CoL .
Type species: Euphoria hera Burmeister , by monotypy.
Erirhipidia Casey 1915: 308 View in CoL . Synonym.
Type species: Scarabaeus indus L., by original designation.
Haplophoria Casey 1915: 310 View in CoL . Synonym.
Type species: Euphoria kernii Haldeman , by original designation.
Euphorhipis Casey 1915: 314 View in CoL . Synonym.
Type species: Cetonia subtomentosa Gory and Percheron , by original designation.
Rhipiphoria Casey 1915: 316 . Synonym.
Type species: Cetonia geminata Chevrolat , by original designation.
Isorhipina Casey 1915: 326 View in CoL . Synonym.
Type species: Cetonia biguttata Gory and Percheron , by original designation.
Description. Length 7.6–21.5 mm; width 4.5–12.2 mm. Color: Dorsal surface highly variable, shiny or dull, frequently tomentous. Pronotum unicolored to medially or laterally vittate; vittae black, dark green, or dark brown; sides occasionally with cretaceous band. Elytra frequently with pattern of color or cretaceous markings. Pygidium frequently with cretaceous markings or entirely cretaceous. Melanistic forms observed. Head: Surface unarmed. Frons medially depressed or flat, occasionally with weak, median, longitudinal ridge, rarely with central protuberance, moderately to densely punctate, rugopunctate, or rugose; punctures round, deep to moderately impressed, small to moderate in size, occasionally confluent, glabrous to densely setose. Clypeus subquadrate, subrectangular, or acuminate, sides subparallel to strongly anteriorly convergent, flat to strongly raised, lateral declivity weakly to strongly expanded; apex vaguely to strongly reflexed, occasionally with 2–4 small denticles, truncate to moderately sinuate in dorsal view; surface moderately to densely punctate; punctures round, deep to moderately impressed, small to moderate in size, occasionally confluent, glabrous to densely setose. Antenna with 10 antennomeres, antennal club frequently sexually dimorphic in length (as long as or longer than stem in males, shorter in females). Pronotum: Surface sparsely to densely punctate; punctures round to lunulate, minute to moderate, frequently denser and larger toward sides, sparsely to densely setose. Widest at base, sides strongly angulate to evenly rounded, subparallel to strongly convergent anteriorly. Base in front of scutellum evenly rounded to strongly emarginate. Scutellum longer than wide, sides straight, impunctate to densely punctate; punctures minute to moderate, glabrous to densely setose. Elytra: Sides subparallel, apex truncate. Surface sparsely to densely punctate, punctures small to moderate, 2 discal costae weakly to strongly raised. Subhumeral emargination moderately to strongly developed. Pygidium: Surface concentrically to subconcentrically striate, occasionally polished at middle, sparsely to densely setose. Legs: Surface moderately densely to densely setose, setae moderate to long. Protibiae tridentate, teeth equidistant or apical and medial teeth closer to each other than to basal tooth; teeth oblique or transverse to tibia, basal tooth frequently obsolete to subobsolete. Meso- and metatibiae with variably developed carinae. Mesotarsal length frequently sexually dimorphic (as long as or longer than mesotibia in males, shorter in females). Metafemora with long suture on internal angle. Metatibiae apically expanded at times, with 2 apical spurs; coxae flattened in posterolateral area. Venter: Prosternal process laterally compressed, short. Mesometasternal process weakly to strongly compressed laterally, variably extended anteriorly, apex variably rounded. Mesepimera, metasternum, and metacoxae setose. Metasternum flattened at middle, rugose, moderately densely to densely setose laterally, weakly to moderately densely punctate and setose at middle, median sulcus variably impressed. Sides of abdominal sternites rounded to ridged. Male genitalia: Aedeagus without spines or hooks, parameres fused at times. Some diagnostic for species.
Diagnosis. Euphoria is separated from the other American Cetoniini , Chlorixanthe , by the short prosternal process, elevated elytral costae, rounded scutellar apex, and body not strongly deplanate. Separating Euphoria from some Old World genera is difficult using a single character but can be done by the following combination of characters in Euphoria : unarmed head; presence of 2 discal costae on elytra; straight sides of scutellum; flattened metasternum; long posterior striae on metafemora; metacoxae flattened in posterolateral area; pygidium concentrically to subconcentrically striate; and parameres without hooks or spines.
Composition. Euphoria is comprised of 59 species, ten of which are described here as new. More than half of the 134 names in the group are synonyms (Appendix 1). Based on morphological characters of adults, all Euphoria species can, for the most part, be assigned to one of 14 species-groups ( Table 5 View Table 5 ).
Species-Groups. The amount of interspecific variation in the clypeal apex, clypeal sides, shape and length of mesometasternal process, legs, genitalia, body shape, and body vestiture seen in Euphoria is only found in other groups or other geographic regions when several genera are studied. Therefore, a further breakdown of this genus appears inevitable. Based on my morphological analysis, I have enough information to propose a new classification that would result in the creation of several genera. However, given the difficulties in ascertaining a classification based on phylogenetically meaningful characters ( Orozco and Philips 2010), I am reluctant to propose new genera. Therefore, I resort to species-groups instead. Additional evidence on the phylogenetic relationships of these groups might provide the support necessary to consider them genera.
The division of this heterogeneous genus into informal species-groups is based on the character examination of almost 20,000 specimens including most of the types. The diagnoses of the speciesgroups are products of the aforementioned character analysis and are based on hypothesized synapomorphies. All groups are supported by a guild of characters rather than unique characters. Characters from the head (i. e., shape of the clypeus and presence or absence of sexual dimorphism in the antennal lamellae) frequently used to support genera in scarab beetles are here used to support some of the species-groups. Other characters used to support genera in different groups of scarabs are also used here to support species-groups: pronotal shape, shape of the mesometasternal process, tarsal length, and general shape of the parameres ( Table 6 View Table 6 and each species-group diagnosis). The groups I consider basal, based on the characters they exhibit, are presented first. Table 5 View Table 5 shows the species composition of each group.
Natural History. Life history for most of the species is unknown. What information is known is listed under each species treatment. Unless indicated by a reference citation, the information presented was recorded from label data.
In general, the life cycle is estimated to be one year, but it is known for only a few species. In temperate climates, the overwintering stage is the adult ( Blatchley 1910; Hayes 1925; Ritcher 1945; Ritcher 1966; Lago et al. 1979; Ratcliffe 1991; Ratcliffe and Paulsen 2008). The larvae are known to occur in highly organic soil, sandy soil, ant mounds, ant debris piles, rodent nests, and under dry dung. Most larvae feed directly on the substrate where they live, but some have been recorded feeding on the roots of grasses (e. g., Euphoria sepulcralis (F.); Buss 2004). The third instar is known for ten species: Euphoria abreona Janson (described as Euphoria precaria Janson ) ( Orozco and Pardo-Locarno 2004), Euphoria areata (F.) (described as Stephanucha thoracica Casey ) ( Skelley 1991), Euphoria basalis (Gory and Percheron) ( Ramírez-Salinas et al. 2001) , Euphoria devulsa Horn ( Micó et al. 2000) , Euphoria fulgida (F.) ( Hayes 1925, 1929; Ritcher 1945, 1966), Euphoria herbacea (Olivier) ( Hayes 1925, 1929; Ritcher 1945, 1966), Euphoria hirtipes Horn (described as Euphoriaspis hirtipes (Horn)) ( Ratcliffe 1976) , Euphoria inda (L.) ( Hayes 1925, 1929; Ritcher 1945, 1966), Euphoria lurida (F.) ( Micó et al. 2000), and E. sepulcralis ( Hayes 1925, 1929; Ritcher 1945, 1966). The pupae have only been described for E. abreona ( Orozco and Pardo-Locarno 2004) and E. hirtipes ( Ratcliffe 1976) .
Adults have coriaceous mandibles and are known to feed on liquids from plant exudates, soft parts from plants, fruits, and dung. Pollen-feeding is suspected, but there is still no direct evidence of it. Some species have been reported to cause damage to flowers and crops ( Halbert 1996; Cunha et al. 2007), but this is mostly due to mechanical damage caused by the grasping legs of numerous individuals when feeding en masse.
Some species are frequently found associated as adults and larvae with mounds or debris piles of ants of the genera Acromyrmex Mayr , Atta F., Formica L., and Pogonomyrmex Mayr ( Hymenoptera : Formicidae ): E. areata , Euphoria biguttata (Gory and Percheron) , Euphoria canescens (Gory and Percheron) , Euphoria dimidiata (Gory and Percheron) , Euphoria discicollis (Thomson) , E. hirtipes , E. inda , Euphoria leucographa (Gory and Percheron) , Euphoria levinotata Orozco new species, Euphoria pilipennis (Kraatz) , Euphoria pulchella (Gory and Percheron) , and Euphoria subtomentosa (Gory and Percheron) ( Wheeler 1910; Hinton and Ancona 1935; Windsor 1964; Ratcliffe 1976; Deloya 1988; Rojas 1989; Deloya and Morón 1994; Deloya et al. 1995; Navarrete-Heredia 2001; Paulsen 2002). Adults of some species are also frequently found associated with nests of rodents of the genera Cynomys Rafinesque , Geomys Rafinesque , and Neotoma Say and Ord ( Rodentia : Sciuridae , Geomyidae , and Cricetidae , respectively): E. areata , E. devulsa , E. discicollis , Euphoria fascifera (LeConte) , E. histrionica Thomson , E. levinotata , and Euphoria verticalis Horn. These associations appear to be opportunistic, since the species are also known to occur in other habitats.
Geographic Distribution. Euphoria species are distributed from southern Canada to northern Argentina . At both extremes the diversity is low, having only two and one species, respectively (Appendix 2). Species are known from every continental country in the Americas except Chile and Suriname. The only species known from the Antilles ( E. sepulcralis from Eleuthera and New Providence Island in the Bahamas) was probably recently introduced to the islands by shipments of fruits or flowers as it has been the case with other cetoniines (i. e., Protaetia fusca (Herbst)) . The highest species diversity is found between the southern United States and Guatemala, decreasing south of the Nicaraguan depression and north of the states of Arizona and Texas in the United States. This distribution resembles the Paleo- American pattern described by Halffter (1987). The Paleo-American pattern includes organisms that had an early immigration to the continent from lineages that originated in the Old World ( Halffter 1987). As implied by this pattern, species of Cetoniini could have diversified and flourished in the Mexican mountain ranges north of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec and slowly extended their ranges and speciated both to the north and south.
Phylogenetic Relationships. Previous phylogenetic analyses of the tribe ( Orozco and Philips 2010) have illustrated the difficulties in studying this genus morphologically. Molecular characters are being used in the phylogeny of the Cetoniinae (JO, unpublished data; D. Hawks and M. Paulsen, personal communication). Preliminary results from these analyses support the monophyly of Euphoria when the species formerly considered in Stephanucha are included, but the analyses are far from definitive in the study of the relationships among the species. Larval characters have not been exhaustively explored, but appear to be only of diagnostic use. The larvae of only 10 of 59 of the species are known to date.
Chlorixanthe was hypothesized to be the sistergroup of Euphoria by Orozco and Philips (2010). The flattened body, the unusually long and rhomboidal mesometasternal process, and the unusually compressed tarsi set Chlorixanthe species apart from all other Cetoniini . Two species, C. flavoviridis and C. propinqua , are currently known in the genus.
Previous Groupings. Burmeister (1842) and Casey (1915) provided the only two classifications supported by morphologic characters. The speciesgroups of Bates (1889) and Hardy (2001) are taxonomically untestable because the basis for them is unknown.
Regarding the American Cetoniini , Burmeister’ s (1842) classification is plagued with imprecisions. Due to the fact that he had access to few (in some cases, apparently just one) specimens per species and at times only one sex, his classification and character discussion are of limited use. For example, at the generic level, he separated Euphoria from Erirhipis and Stephanucha by it having the antennal club equally long in both sexes and the clypeus anteriorly reduced. Nevertheless, of 12 species he included in Euphoria , only four actually have this character: E. lurida , E. basalis , E. canescens , and E. biguttata .
Casey (1915), while successful in showing the diversity in the group, failed in providing a predictable classification. Most, if not all, of Casey’ s genera or subgenera are so generally defined and filled with exceptions that almost any given species could be included in any of them without much trouble. His classification is also, like that of Burmeister (1842), plagued with imprecisions (for examples, see taxonomic history of Euphoria hera Burmeister and E. hirtipes ). At the species level, Casey was able to observe numerous minor differences in the characters. Unfortunately, for a group with such cornucopian intraspecific variation, this was not a good attribute. All of the 17 species and eight subspecies described by Casey (1915) are synonyms. Figure 1 View Fig shows the total number of species described by year when synonyms are included and excluded.
KEY TO THE SPECIES- GROUPS OF EUPHORIA
1. Clypeal apex strongly to moderately sinuate in dorsal view (e. g., Figs. 41b View Fig , 48b View Fig ). Base of pronotum in front of scutellum weakly to moderately emarginate (e. g., Figs. 44a View Fig , 47a View Fig ) ................. geminata species-group (p. 72)
1′. Clypeal apex truncate or weakly sinuate in dorsal view. Base of pronotum variable................................................................2
2(1′). Pronotal base evenly rounded in front of scutellum (e. g., Figs. 58a View Fig , 60a View Fig ). Mesometasternal process strongly compressed and setose. Clypeus frequently quadridentate or bidentate (e. g., Figs. 56b View Fig , 59b View Fig )..............................................................3
2′. Pronotal base sinuate to variably emarginate in front of scutellum. Mesometasternal process variable. Clypeus without denticles ..................................................................... 5
3(2). Clypeal apex without denticles ( Fig. 58b View Fig ) ........... discicollis species-group View in CoL (p. 102)
3′. Clypeal apex with 2–4 denticles...........4
4(3′). Apex of clypeus with 2 denticles ( Figs. 59b View Fig , 60b View Fig ) ........ verticalis species-group (p. 103)
4′. Apex of clypeus with 4 denticles ( Figs. 55b View Fig , 56b View Fig , 57b View Fig ) ...... areata species-group View in CoL (p. 98)
5(2′). Apex of clypeus strongly emarginate ( Fig. 25b View Fig )...... hera species-group (p. 57)
5′. Apex of clypeus not strongly emarginate..............................................................6
6(5′). Clypeus quadrate to trapezoidal with apex and sides not raised (slightly raised at most) (e. g., Figs. 5b View Fig , 9b View Fig ). Frons flattened and strigose. Dorsum variably covered by cretaceous markings..................................... ............ histrionica species-group (p. 21)
6′. Clypeus variable in form, never quadrate or trapezoidal; apex and sides variable. Frons never flattened and strigose. Dorsum with or without cretaceous markings............................................7
7(6′). Elytral striae densely setose, composed almost exclusively of long grooves (e. g., Figs. 49a View Fig , 52a View Fig ). Clypeal apex and sides not raised. Pygidium surface strongly concentric...... pulchella species-group (p. 85)
7′. Elytral striae never densely setose nor composed almost exclusively of long grooves. Clypeal apex variable. Pygidium variable...................................................8
8(7′). Pronotum densely setose, with regular, glabrous patches on surface ( Figs. 53a View Fig , 54a View Fig ). Parameres as in Figs. 53c View Fig and 54c View Fig .... ......................... inda species-group View in CoL (p. 92)
8′. Pronotum variably setose, if densely setose then never with regular glabrous patches on surface. Parameres not as in Figs. 53c View Fig and 54c View Fig ................................... 9 View Fig
9(8′). Clypeus moderately to strongly attenuate, sides and apex not raised (e. g., Figs. 2b View Fig , 3b View Fig ). Humeral area frequently with red markings (e. g., Figs. 3a View Fig , 4a View Fig ). Cretaceous markings on elytra small to large when present.... biguttata species-group (p. 16)
9′. Clypeus never attenuate, sides frequently raised. Humeral area without red markings. Cretaceous markings on elytra small when present.........................................10
10(9′). Pronotum with vittae (except Euphoria submaculosa (Gory and Percheron)) (e. g., Figs. 30a View Fig , 32a View Fig ). Dorsum generally yellowish brown with black or brown markings, rarely green with yellowish markings. Without cretaceous spots on dorsum......... ....................... avita species-group (p. 58)
10′. Pronotum without vittae. Dorsum never yellowish brown, or with brown or black markings. Frequently with cretaceous spots on dorsum ................................................ 11
11(10′). Clypeal apex strongly reflexed in both sexes, sinuate in frontal view (e. g., Figs. 22b View Fig , 24b View Fig ). Female metatarsi strongly compressed. Male parameres widely expanded apically as in Figs. 22c View Fig , 23c View Fig , 24c View Fig ........ candezei species-group (p. 52)
11′. Clypeal apex reflexed only in males. Female metatarsi not strongly compressed. Male parameres not widely expanded apically ............................................... 12
12(11′). Dorsum tomentous (e. g., Figs. 18a View Fig , 20a View Fig ) ............ herbacea species-group (p. 47)
12′. Dorsum shiny (e. g., Figs. 11a View Fig , 16a View Fig )....13
13(12′). Black, brown, or cupreous species (e. g., Figs. 13a View Fig , 14a View Fig ). Elytra with abundant, vermiform or reniform, cretaceous markings. Pronotum frequently with cretaceous line on lateral margin ............................. .......... sepulcralis species-group (p. 28)
13′. Greenish or violaceous species (e. g., Figs.16a View Fig , 17a View Fig ). Cretaceous markings on elytra irregular, sparse, minute at times. Pronotum without cretaceous line on pronotal sides...... ................ fulgida species-group (p. 41)
CLAVE PARA LOS GRUPOS DE ESPECIES DE EUPHORIA
1. Ápice clipeal moderada o fuertemente sinuado en vista dorsal (e. g., Figs. 41b View Fig , 48b View Fig ). Base del pronoto en frente del escutelo débil a moderadamente emarginada (e. g., Figs. 44a View Fig , 47a View Fig ).... grupo geminata (p. 72)
1′. Ápice clipeal truncado o ligeramente sinuado en vista dorsal. Base del pronoto variable...................................................2
2(1′). Base del pronoto redondeada en frente del escutelo (e. g., Figs. 58a View Fig , 60a View Fig ). Proceso mesometasternal fuertemente comprimido y setoso. Clípeo frecuentemente cuadridentado o bidentado (e. g., Figs. 56b View Fig , 59b View Fig ) .................................................................. 3
2′. Base del pronoto en frente del escutelo variablemente emarginada. Proceso mesometasternal variable. Clípeo sin dentículos ........................................... 5
3(2). Ápice clipeal sin dentículos ( Fig. 58b View Fig ).... ........................ grupo discicollis View in CoL (p. 102)
3′. Ápice clipeal con 2–4 dentículos..........4
4(3′). Ápice clipeal con 2 dentículos ( Figs. 59b View Fig , 60b View Fig ).................. grupo verticalis (p. 103)
4′. Ápice clipeal con 4 dentículos ( Figs. 55b View Fig , 56b View Fig , 57b View Fig ) ............... grupo areata View in CoL (p. 98)
5(2′). Ápice clipeal fuertemente emarginado ( Fig. 25b View Fig ).................. grupo hera (p. 57)
5′. Ápice clipeal no fuertemente emarginado..............................................................6
6(5′). Clípeo cuadrado o trapezoidal, ápice y lados no fuertemente elevados (ligeramente elevados cuando mucho) (e. g., Figs. 5b View Fig , 9b View Fig ). Frente aplanada y estrigosa. Dorso variablemente cubierto por máculas cretáceas ....... grupo histrionica (p. 21)
6′. Clípeo variable en forma, nunca cuadrado o trapezoidal, ápice y lados variables. Frente nunca aplanada y estrigosa. Dorso con o sin máculas cretáceas...................7
7(6′). Estrías elitrales densamente setosas, compuestas en su mayoría por surcos largos (e. g., Figs. 49a View Fig , 52a View Fig ). Ápice y lados del clípeo nunca elevados. Superficie pigidial fuertemente concéntrica ............ ......................... grupo pulchella (p. 85)
7′. Estrías elitrales nunca densamente setosas o compuestas en su mayoría por surcos largos. Ápice clipeal variable. Pigídio variable ..................................................... 8
8(7′). Pronoto densamente setoso, con parches glabros e irregulares en su superficie ( Figs. 53a View Fig , 54a View Fig ). Parámeros como en las Figs. 53c y View Fig 54c View Fig .......... grupo inda View in CoL (p. 92)
8′. Pronoto variablemente setoso, nunca con parches glabros e irregulares en su superficie. Parámeros no como en las Figs. 53c y View Fig 54c View Fig ................................... 9 View Fig
9(8′). Clípeo moderada a fuertemente atenuado, ápice y lados no elevados (e. g., Figs. 2b View Fig , 3b View Fig ). Área humeral frecuentemente con máculas rojas (e. g., Figs. 3a View Fig , 4a View Fig ). Máculas cretáceas elitrales pequeñas o grandes si presentes ............ grupo biguttata (p. 16)
9′. Clípeo nunca atenuado, lados frecuentemente elevados. Área humeral sin máculas rojas. Máculas cretáceas elitrales pequeñas si presentes ................................................. 10
10(9′). Pronoto con vittae (excepto Euphoria submaculosa (Gory y Percheron)) (e. g., Figs. 30a View Fig , 32a View Fig ). Dorso generalmente caféamarillento con máculas negras o cafés, raramente verde con máculas amarillentas. Dorso sin máculas cretáceas....................... .................................... grupo avita (p. 58)
10′. Pronoto sin vittae. Dorso nunca caféamarillento o con máculas negras o cafés. Dorso frecuentemente con máculas cretáceas.................................................. 11
11(10′). Ápice clipeal fuertemente elevado en ambos sexos, sinuado en vista frontal (e. g., Figs. 22b View Fig , 24b View Fig ). Metatarsos de las hembras fuertemente comprimidos. Parámeros ampliamente expandidos apicalmente como en las Figs. 22c View Fig , 23c View Fig , 24c View Fig ........................ grupo candezei (p. 52)
11′. Ápice clipeal elevado solo en machos. Metatarsos de las hembras no fuertemente comprimidos. Parámeros no fuertemente expandidos apicalmente.......................12
12(11′). Dorso tomentoso (e. g., Figs. 18a View Fig , 20a View Fig ) ... ........................... grupo herbacea (p. 47)
12′. Dorso brillante (e. g., Figs. 11a View Fig , 16a View Fig )...13
13(12′). Especies negras, cafés o cobrizas (e. g., Figs. 13a View Fig , 14a View Fig ). Élitros con abundantes máculas cretáceas vermiformes o reniformes. Pronoto frecuentemente con línea cretácea sobre el margen lateral ............................... .......................... grupo sepulcralis (p. 28)
13′. Especies verdosas o violáceas (e. g., Figs. 16a View Fig , 17a View Fig ). Máculas cretáceas elitrales irregulares, escasas, en ocasiones diminutas. Pronoto sin línea cretácea sobre el margen lateral...... grupo fulgida (p. 41)
Antennal Pronotal | Emargination | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cretaceous Clypeus Clypeus | Frons | club longer sides | of the base | |||||
Dorsal surface | markings reflexed | convergent Longitudinal flattened in males than sexually | of the | |||||
Species-group | vestiture | on dorsum in males Clypeal apex anteriorly ridge on frons and strigose in females dimorphic | pronotum | |||||
biguttata group | shiny | prs; abs absent | entire present | absent | absent | absent | absent | weak; strong |
histrionica group | shiny | prs; abs absent | entire absent | absent | present absent | absent | weak; strong | |
sepulcralis group | shiny | present prs; abs | entire absent | absent | absent | prs; abs | absent | weak; strong |
fulgida group | shiny | prs; abs prs; abs | entire absent | absent | absent | present | absent | weak; strong |
herbacea group | tomentous | present present | entire absent | absent | absent | present | prs; abs | weak; strong |
candezei group | tmts; shiny | prs; abs absent | entire absent | prs; abs absent | present | prs; abs | strong | |
hera group | tomentous | absent absent | emarginate absent | present | absent | present | prs; abs | strong |
avita group | tmts; shiny | absent present | entire absent | absent | absent | present | prs; abs | weak; strong |
geminata group | tmts; shiny | prs; abs prs; abs | sinuate absent | absent | absent | present | prs; abs | absent; weak |
pulchella group | tmts; shiny | prs; abs absent | entire present | absent | absent | prs; abs | absent | weak; strong |
inda group | tmts; shiny | absent absent | entire absent | absent | absent | prs; abs | absent | weak; strong |
areata group | shiny | prs; abs absent | quadridentate absent | absent | absent | present | absent | absent |
discicollis group | shiny | absent absent | entire absent | absent | absent | present | absent | absent |
verticalis group | shiny | absent absent | bidentate absent | absent | absent | absent | absent | absent |
Metatarsi Tarsal claws as | ||||||||
Elytral striae Mesometasternal Protibiae Protibial teeth Mesotarsal | strongly long or longer Abdomen Sides of abdomen | |||||||
composed mostly process small | sexually short and length sexually compressed than last strongly convex | weakly to | ||||||
Species-group | of deep grooves and compressed dimorphic perpendicular dimorphic | in females tarsomere in females strongly ridged | ||||||
biguttata group | absent | absent | absent absent | absent | absent | absent | absent | absent |
histrionica group | absent | absent | absent absent | absent | absent | absent | absent | absent |
sepulcralis group | absent | absent | absent absent | absent | absent | absent | absent | absent |
fulgida group | absent | absent | absent absent | absent | absent | absent | prs; abs | present |
herbacea group | absent | absent | absent absent | prs; abs | absent | absent | present | prs; abs |
candezei group | absent | absent | absent absent | present | present | absent | present | absent |
hera group | absent | absent | absent absent | absent | absent | absent | present | absent |
avita group | absent | absent | present absent | present | absent | absent | present | absent |
geminata group | absent | absent | present absent | prs; abs | absent | absent | present | absent |
pulchella group | present | absent | absent absent | absent | absent | absent | present | absent |
inda group | absent | prs; abs | absent absent | absent | absent | absent | prs; abs | absent |
areata group | absent | present | absent absent | absent | absent | absent | present | absent |
discicollis group | absent | present | present absent | absent | absent | present | present | absent |
verticalis group | absent | present | absent present | absent | absent | absent | present | absent |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Euphoria Burmeister, 1842
Orozco, Jesús 2012 |
Anatropis
Casey 1915: 298 |
Euphoriaspis
Casey 1915: 298 |
Euphoriopsis
Casey 1915: 298 |
Erirhipidia
Casey 1915: 308 |
Haplophoria
Casey 1915: 310 |
Euphorhipis
Casey 1915: 314 |
Rhipiphoria
Casey 1915: 316 |
Isorhipina
Casey 1915: 326 |
Goraqua Péringuey 1907: 358
Peringuey 1907: 358 |
Euphoria
Burmeister, H. 1842: 370 |
Erirhipi s
Burmeister, H. 1842: 385 |
Stephanucha
Burmeister, H. 1842: 385 |