Antipathes lentipinna Brook, 1889,

Terrana, Lucas, Bo, Marzia, Opresko, Dennis M. & Eeckhaut, Igor, 2020, Shallow-water black corals (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Hexacorallia: Antipatharia) from SW Madagascar, Zootaxa 4826 (1), pp. 1-62: 13-16

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4826.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1DC59C31-61D1-4458-897B-29D9CA523634

DOI

http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4448302

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F5768787-936E-4261-FF4C-FB64FF36FD41

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Antipathes lentipinna Brook, 1889
status

 

Antipathes lentipinna Brook, 1889 

Figs. 7View FIGURE 7, 8View FIGURE 8

Antipathes lentipinna Brook 1889, p. 103  , pl. 9, fig. 19

Material examined. A large branch from one colony, Toliara 35 m specimen INV.131337  .

Depth range. 30–50 m.

Description. A branched, bushy colony measuring one meter in width and 60 cm in height, with a reddish color ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, a–c). The basal stem is entirely covered by epibionts and divides in two thick axes, each around 1 cm in diameter. The branching pattern tends to be uniserial, with terminal branchets usually vertically directed, but not everywhere on the colony, some being curved to reach that position ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, a–b). The longest branch bearing branchlets in the fragment is 25 cm. Terminal branchlets measure up to 11 cm in length, but usually less than 5 cm. A terminal branchlet measuring 6.3 cm measures 1 mm at the base (measured with tissues). The terminal branchlets are very irregularly spaced, varying from 4 mm to 30 mm. Due to this variability, the number per branchlet per cm cannot be counted, as sometimes there is no branchlet along one cm. The branchlets are mostly inserted 35–45°, but sometimes almost perpendicularly. The polyps are large, with long tentacles and arranged in a single row on the terminal branches ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, c). This row is sometimes not perfectly linear. On thicker branches, polyps are irregularly distributed. They measure 0.8–1.3 mm in transverse diameter and are generally close to each other, such as there is no interpolypar space. At places where the row is not continuous and linear, polyps can be spaced up to 0.4 mm apart, and 7–8 polyps are found per cm.

The spines are conical and either slightly inclined towards the distal part of the branch or perpendicularly inserted to the corallum ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, d–f). Their surface is papillose on almost their whole surface, with papillae sometimes elongated towards the tip of the spine ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, g–l). Their tip is either simple or multiply forked, with a somewhat coronate arrangement of the apical lobes ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, e, g, i). Sometimes two close spines can fuse at their base ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, l). There also may be extra lobes on the lateral sides of the spines ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, j). Tall conical spines are only seen on the smallest branchlets, where the difference between abpolypar and polypar spines is also the most marked ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, d). Spines tend to be conical onthicker branches ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, e–f). On thick branches (i.e. 2.6 mm in diameter), some spines are stout ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, e–f). On thick branches> 4 mm in diameter, numerous spines are conical with an acute tip ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, f). On a branchlet 0.34 mm in diameter, polypar spines measure 0.17–0.24 mm and are spaced 0.27–0.50 mm apart. Abpolypar spines measure 0.12–0.16 mm and are spaced 0.28–0.44 mm apart, 6–7 longitudinal rows can be seen in one aspect. On a branch 0.95 mm in diameter, polypar spines have same sizes as on thinner branches and they are spaced 0.29–0.47 mm apart. The abpolypar spines measure 0.17–0.19 mm and are spaced 0.30–0.46 mm apart, 6–7 longitudinal rows are also seen in one aspect. On a thick branch 4.6 mm in diameter, the rows are no longer visible and the spines measure 0.13–0.17 mm. Secondary spines are scarce and not always present ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, e–f), they measure up to 0.05 mm.

Taxonomic remarks. The present specimen shares similar spine morphology with a complex of shrub-like species composed of Antipathes griggi Opresko, 2009  , An. lentipinna Brook, 1889  , An. spinulosa ( Schultze, 1896)  , An. fruticosa Gray, 1857  and An. virgata Esper, 1788  ( Opresko 2009). A detailed comparison of these species is given in Opresko (2009). Antipathes griggi  is known from the Hawaiian Islands, An. spinulosa  from Indonesia, An. fruticosa  from New Zealand, while only An. lentipinna  and An. virgata sensu Brook, 1889  , are both from a locality relatively close to Madagascar, the Red Sea. All these species have an irregularly branched corallum and spines with multiple lobes at the apex and papillae or striations on the surface ( Opresko 2009). However, only the branching pattern of An. griggi  , An. lentipinna  and An. fruticosa  is similar to the Malagasy specimen. As highlighted by Opresko (2009), the branching of An. fruticosa  and An. griggi  differ from that of An. lentipinna  by being more consistently vertically directed. On the other hand, in An. fruticosa  the apical lobes of the spines tend to be more confined to the apex and, in places, have a more coronate arrangement (which is even more true in An. spinulosa  ) as in An. lentipinna  , while on the thicker parts, tips of the spines have a more blunt, rounded appearance ( Opresko 2009). Examination of the type specimen of An. lentipinna  by Opresko (2009) revealed similar spines as those observed here ( Fig. 8View FIGURE 8). The coronate arrangement of the apical lobes seen in the holotype ( Fig. 8View FIGURE 8, b) is also seen in the Malagasy specimen ( Fig. 7View FIGURE 7, d, g, i). In his description of An. lentipinna, Brook (1889)  highlighted the general resemblance of the species with An. virgata  , from which it differs mostly by more spreading branches (a comparison between the Malagasy branches and Brook’s specimen of An. virgata  is shown in Fig. 11View FIGURE 11, c–e). The branchlets of An. lentipinna  are reported to be 8–15 cm, generally collected together near the upper portion of the branch, and generally uniserial ( Brook 1889). The spines are reported to be much longer and more slender than those of An. virgata  , and simple with no tubercles nor apical lobes in the sample examined by Brook (1889); however, the spine morphology varies from branch to branch in the type (pers. obs. DMO). In addition, Brook did not mention the presence of any secondary spines. In the Malagasy specimen, their presence was scarce and not seen in all branches analyzed. Brook concluded that An. lentipinna  was distinguished from A. virgata  by the marked difference in diameter between the branches and branchlets. Later work from Summers (1910) also reported An. lentipinna  from Mozambique ( Portuguese East Africa). Her description was rather vague, and the main features reported were large polyps (2 mm in transverse diameter) and branches onone side only. Considering the slight differences with Brook’s description and the similarities in spine ornamentation and shape as described in Opresko (2009), the name An. lentipinna  is assigned to the present specimen.

Distribution. Red Sea (type locality, Brook 1889), Mozambique ( Summers 1910), Madagascar (present study).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Cnidaria

Class

Anthozoa

Order

Antipatharia

Family

Antipathidae

Genus

Antipathes

Loc

Antipathes lentipinna Brook, 1889

Terrana, Lucas, Bo, Marzia, Opresko, Dennis M. & Eeckhaut, Igor 2020
2020
Loc

Antipathes lentipinna Brook 1889 , p. 103

, Brook 1889: 103
1889