Euochin Prószyński, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5297.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A5E47BD6-8995-40CC-9C0F-CA7462A62DF2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8005022 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F70C8787-FF8D-E079-FF5C-FF13FB8BFCD3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Euochin Prószyński, 2018 |
status |
|
Genus Euochin Prószyński, 2018 View in CoL View at ENA
Euochin Prószyński View in CoL , in Prószyński, Lissner & Schäfer, 2018: 55 View Cited Treatment , figs 19, 20; Logunov, 2020: 525, figs 11–17; Wang & Li, 2021: 127 View Cited Treatment , figs 2A–D, 3A–G; Wang & Li 2022: 93 View Cited Treatment , figs 5A–D, 6A–G, 7A–G.
Type species. Euophrys atrata View in CoL Song & Chai, 1992, by original designation.
Diagnosis. Modified from Logunov (2020): similar to Euophrys (s. str., see Logunov 1997) in body shape and genitalia, but can be distinguished by: (1) the more robust RTA of the male palp (e.g., Fig. 26 View FIGURES 24–30 ; vs. seta-like RTA in Euophrys ); (2) the presence of a long and light-colored setal tuft on the male palp (e.g., Fig. 136 View FIGURES 135–138 ; vs. usually absent in Euophrys ); (3) the relatively short and broad embolus (e.g., Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9–14 ; vs. thread-like embolus in Euophrys ); (4) the embolic disc slightly concaved centrally or highly reduced, usually slightly hidden by the apical edge of the tegulum (e.g., Figs 12 View FIGURES 9–14 , 61 View FIGURES 60–66 , see Liu et al. 2020: figs 1B–D; vs. embolic disc highly developed and exposed in Euophrys ); (5) the tip of the embolus raised above the plane of the embolic disc (e.g., Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9–14 ; vs. the embolus almost within the plane of embolic disc in Euophrys ); (6) the relatively short copulatory duct (e.g., Fig. 14 View FIGURES 9–14 ; vs. much longer copulatory duct in Euophrys ); (7) the spermatheca usually visible through epigynal window, except in Euochin bamianshanensis ( Liu, Wang & Peng, 2020) comb. nov. (see Liu et al. 2020: figs 2B–C), E. extraculum sp. nov. ( Figs 65 View FIGURES 60–66 , 69 View FIGURES 67–70 ), E. nanjiabawa sp. nov. (Figs 115, 119) and E. tianhe sp. nov. ( Figs 164 View FIGURES 159–165 , 168 View FIGURES 166–169 ; vs. spermatheca usually lower than the posterior edge of epigynal window in Euophrys ).
Description. Small and compact jumping spiders (total length 2.58–3.86 in males; 2.93–4.28 in females). Body generally dark (especially in males), both sexes with white to light-yellow setae forming scattered stripes and patches around the body (e.g., Figs 51–54 View FIGURES 51–54 ), making these spiders reminiscent of Chinattus Logunov, 1999 and Nannenus Simon, 1902 . Promargin of chelicera with two teeth, retromargin with one simple tooth or compound tooth with multiple cusps (e.g., Figs 211–212 View FIGURES 208–212 ). Male palps with light-colored setal tuft (e.g., Fig. 52 View FIGURES 51–54 ); RSDL visible in ventral view (e.g., Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9–14 ); RTA developed (e.g., Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9–14 ). Female epigynal windows variable in size and position, but usually overlapping with the spermathecae in ventral view (e.g., Fig. 13 View FIGURES 9–14 ); copulatory ducts short, some species with obvious accessory glands near the copulatory openings (e.g., Fig. 14 View FIGURES 9–14 ); spermathecae ovoid to nearly globular (e.g., Fig. 14 View FIGURES 9–14 ); fertilization ducts variable in size (e.g., Figs 84 View FIGURES 80–84 , 116).
Remark. The morphological characters of Euophrys bamianshanensis Liu, Wang & Peng, 2020 and E. longyangensis Lei & Peng, 2012 match the above diagnoses of Euochin , and both species have: (1) the long setal tuft on the male palps ( Fig. 91 View FIGURES 89–93 , see Liu et al. 2020); (2) the embolus that is elevated above the plane of the embolic disc ( Fig. 97 View FIGURES 94–99 , see Liu et al. 2020: fig. 1C); (3) the developed RTA; as well as (4) the relatively short copulatory duct. In addition, the female epigynal window of Euophrys longyangensis overlaps with the spermatheca in ventral view, which also fits the diagnosis of Euochin . Therefore, we transfer these two species here from Euophrys to Euochin .
Biology. Most of the known species are leaf-litter dwellers. All of the specimens examined in this study were collected by sieving leaf litter on the forest floor in mountainous areas.
Distribution. China, Micronesia ( Caroline Islands), Philippines, Vietnam.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Euochin Prószyński, 2018
Wang, Weihang & Zhang, Junxia 2023 |
Euochin Prószyński
Wang, C. & Li, S. 2022: 93 |
Wang, C. & Li, S. 2021: 127 |
Logunov, D. V. 2020: 525 |
Proszynski, J. & Lissner, J. & Schafer, M. 2018: 55 |