Euochin longyangensis ( Lei & Peng, 2012 ) Wang & Zhang, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5297.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A5E47BD6-8995-40CC-9C0F-CA7462A62DF2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8005050 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F70C8787-FF9F-E06B-FF5C-FB62FDADFD6F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Euochin longyangensis ( Lei & Peng, 2012 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Euochin longyangensis ( Lei & Peng, 2012) View in CoL comb. nov.
Figs 89–103 View FIGURES 89–93 View FIGURES 94–99 View FIGURES 100–103
Euophrys longyangensis Lei & Peng, 2012: 2 View in CoL , figs 1a, 5a–c (♁ only, ♀ mismatched).
Material examined. 1♁ 1♀ (MHBU-ARA-00025234), CHINA: Yunnan Province, Baoshan City, Longyang District, Baihualing Village , Zaotanghe (ĦAEḦḤaeDzã), 25.305794°N, 98.799406°E, 1607 m a.s.l., 19 June 2022, leg. L. Zhang, W. Wang, M. Xu & Z. Yang. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. Both sexes closely resemble Euochin wanlessi sp. nov. in genitalic structure. Males can be recognized by: (1) the portion between the embolic flange and the embolus deeply depressed in Euochin longyangensis comb. nov., while not depressed in E. wanlessi sp. nov.; (2) the central part of the embolus without a ridge in E. longyangensis comb. nov., but with a ridge in E. wanlessi sp. nov. (cf. Figs 94–97 View FIGURES 94–99 , 100–101 View FIGURES 100–103 , 179–182 View FIGURES 179–184 , 185–186 View FIGURES 185–188 ). Females of the two species can be distinguished by: (1) the epigynal window larger in E. longyangensis comb. nov., while evidently smaller in E. wanlessi sp. nov., and (2) the copulatory duct thicker in E. longyangensis comb. nov. than in E. wanlessi sp. nov. (cf. Figs 98–99 View FIGURES 94–99 , 102–103 View FIGURES 100–103 , 183–184 View FIGURES 179–184 , 187–188 View FIGURES 185–188 ). The females are also similar to E. mii in epigynal structure, but can be distinguished by the thicker and longer copulatory ducts (vs. thinner and shorter in E. mii , see Wang & Li 2022: fig. 6B).
Description. Male. Habitus see Figs 89, 91 View FIGURES 89–93 . Carapace length 1.613; abdomen length 1.231. Eye measurements: AME 0.361, ALE 0.255, PME 0.064, PLE 0.204. Leg measurements: I 3.167 (0.940, 0.443, 0.851, 0.512, 0.421), II 2.555 (0.827, 0.392, 0.530, 0.451, 0.355), III 2.816 (0.943, 0.331, 0.563, 0.574, 0.405), IV 3.137 (0.971, 0.355, 0.636, 0.718, 0.457); leg formula: 1432. Color in ethanol: see Lei & Peng (2012). Chelicera ( Fig 93 View FIGURES 89–93 ): with two teeth on promargin and one tooth on retromargin. Palp ( Figs 94–97 View FIGURES 94–99 , 100–101 View FIGURES 100–103 ): distal femur and patella with long white setae; embolic disc small, with pronounced flange; embolus tapered, portion between embolus and embolic flange deeply shrunk; cymbial flange extended; RTA tapered.
Female. Habitus see Figs 90, 92 View FIGURES 89–93 . Carapace length 1.830; abdomen length 1.951. Eye measurements: AME 0.419, ALE 0.240, PME 0.058, PLE 0.227. Leg measurements: I 3.038 (0.980, 0.474, 0.702, 0.436, 0.446), II 2.650 (0.914, 0.365, 0.579, 0.407, 0.385), III 3.205 (1.072, 0.411, 0.656, 0.628, 0.438), IV 3.509 (1.121, 0.416, 0.776, 0.791, 0.405); leg formula: 4312. Color in ethanol: similar to that of male, but with fewer white setae on carapace and abdomen. Chelicera as in male. Epigyne ( Figs 98–99 View FIGURES 94–99 , 102–103 View FIGURES 100–103 ): epigynal window separated by relatively broad median septum; copulatory opening located antero-centrally at margin of epigynal window; copulatory duct relatively thick; spermatheca ovoid.
Remark. We identified this species based on the topotypes and the photograph of the holotype (pers. comm. with Dr. Cheng Wang). Lei & Peng (2012) paired this species based on specimens collected from the same locality. However, two sympatric species of Euochin were found at this site. The genetic distance of COI sequences confirmed the correct pairing of JXZ896 (male) and JXZ897 (female) for E. longyangensis (distance = 0.000). The original female paratype of E. longyangensis belongs to a distinct species, described here as Euochin nu sp. nov., of which the female (JXZ893) and male (JXZ892) pairing was also confirmed (distance = 0.000). The interspecific genetic distance between E. longyangensis and E. nu sp. nov. is 0.106.
Distribution. China (Yunnan).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Euochin longyangensis ( Lei & Peng, 2012 )
Wang, Weihang & Zhang, Junxia 2023 |
Euophrys longyangensis
Lei, H. & Peng, X. 2012: 2 |