Nita elsaff, Huber, Bernhard A. & El-Hennawy, Hisham K., 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.179508 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6248679 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F75887C5-FFE3-FFD0-79D2-F8FEFAA5FEE7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nita elsaff |
status |
gen. nov. |
Nita elsaff View in CoL n. gen., n. sp.
( Figs. 1–16)
Type material. Male holotype from El Saff (29°57’N, 31°28’E), Giza, Egypt; March 1, 2003 (M. Mohafez), in ZFMK (Ar 005).
Etymology. The species name refers to the type locality and is used as a noun in apposition.
Diagnosis. This species is very easily distinguished from all species of Ninetis , the only other African ninetine genus known. Unlike Ninetis species, which have either very simple and small procursi or ( N. russellsmithi ) no procursus at all, the present species has a complex and large procursus ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURES 2 – 6 ). All Ninetis species have a very distinctive bulb, with a long ventral apophysis and a dorsal projection that presumably contains the sperm duct (see Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17 – 20 ). In contrast, Nita elsaff has a single cylindrical projection on the bulb ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURES 2 – 6 ). Moreover, Nita elsaff has a uniquely modified male clypeus ( Figs. 2 View FIGURES 2 – 6 , 7 View FIGURES 7 – 16 ), while the clypeus of all known Ninetis species (and of all other known ninetines) is unmodified. Finally, Nita elsaff females have very distinct pore plates ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 2 – 6 ), while pore plates are either absent, invisible, or extremely indistinct in Ninetis females. From other potentially close relatives ( Aucana , Chisosa ), Nita is easily distinguished by the modified male clypeus.
Male (holotype). Total length 1.7, carapace width 0.76. Leg 1: 6.5 (1.73 + 0.30 + 1.80 + 2.03 + 0.63), tibia 2: 1.33, tibia 3: 1.07, tibia 4: 1.50. Tibia 1 length/diameter (L/d): 23. Habitus as Fig. 1; coloration mostly pale ochre-yellow, carapace with narrow median light brown stripe widening frontally to cover ocular area, abdomen monochromous grey. Ocular area slightly elevated; thoracic furrow present, indistinct and shallow; distance PME–PME 115 Μm; diameter PME 55 Μm; distance PME–ALE 20 Μm; distance AME–AME 25 Μm, diameter AME 40 Μm. Sternum wider than long (0.54/0.48), without frontal humps. Clypeus distinctively modified, with strong hairs situated on a median protrusion ( Figs. 2 View FIGURES 2 – 6 , 7 View FIGURES 7 – 16 ); chelicerae with pair of distinctive frontal apophyses ( Figs. 2 View FIGURES 2 – 6 , 8 View FIGURES 7 – 16 ), with stridulatory ridges ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 7 – 16 ). Palps as in Figures 3 and 4 View FIGURES 2 – 6 ; trochanter projecting ventrally but without distinct apophysis; femur, patella, and tibia widened but otherwise unmodified; procursus distinctive, strongly sclerotized, with small sclerotized flap proximally, long spine and further partly membranous flap ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 7 – 16 ) distally; bulb with one cylindrical projection (presumably the embolus) ending in curved spine ( Figs. 3 View FIGURES 2 – 6 , 10 View FIGURES 7 – 16 ); palpal tarsal organ exposed ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 7 – 16 ). Legs without spines and curved hairs, few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 57%, prolateral trichobothrium present on all legs; tarsus 1 with about 8 very indistinct pseudosegments. Male gonopore without epiandrous spigots ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 7 – 16 ).
Variation. Tibia 1 in other males from Egypt: 1.57, 1.60; from Uzbekistan: 1.67.
Female. In general similar to male, clypeus unmodified ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 7 – 16 ). Tibia 1: 1.23, 1.50 (Cairo), 1.67 (El Saff). Epigynum large relative to abdomen, with distinctive pair of pockets and internal structures visible through cuticle ( Figs. 5, 6 View FIGURES 2 – 6 , 15, 16 View FIGURES 7 – 16 ).
Distribution. Known from two localities in the Cairo-Giza area, Egypt, and from Uzbekistan.
Material examined. EGYPT: El Saff, Giza: type above, together with 1Ψ (used for SEM), same data, in ZFMK. Cairo: Heliopolis (30°06.7’N, 31°17.8’E), in a house, January 19, 2004, March 22 & 26, 2005 (H. El- Hennawy), 2ɗ1Ψ (1ɗ used for SEM) in ZFMK (Ar 006–8). Same locality, February 10, 2004 (H. El-Hennawy), 1Ψ in pure ethanol, in ZFMK. UZBEKISTAN: Kaskadariya (Qashqadaryo) Region, Guzary Distr., 11 km SE Guzar [38°33.1’N, 66°21.4’E], clayey waste ground, Oct. 18, 1992 (A. A. Zyuzin), 1ɗ in ZMMU.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.