Neodolodus Hoffstetter & Soria, 1986

Carrillo, Juan D., Suarez, Catalina, Benites-Palomino, Aldo Marcelo, Vanegas, Andrés, Link, Andrés, Rincón, Aldo F., Luque, Javier, Cooke, Siobhán B., Tallman, Melissa & Billet, Guillaume, 2023, New remains of Neotropical bunodont litopterns and the systematics of Megadolodinae (Mammalia: Litopterna), Geodiversitas 45 (15), pp. 409-447 : 421

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2023v45a15

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B826F25C-33D7-4AEF-9FF8-8B1CBAC28823

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8319186

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F7748797-067D-FFE9-FF2D-FD676E949AB4

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Neodolodus Hoffstetter & Soria, 1986
status

 

Genus Neodolodus Hoffstetter & Soria, 1986

EMENDED DIAGNOSIS. — The dental formula is I 1/2 C 0/1 P 4 / 4 M 3/3. Small, brachydont and bunodont megadolodine litoptern. Neodolodus differs from Megadolodus in its smaller size and having labial and lingual cingulids on m1-3. Neodolodus differs from Bounodus in its smaller size, the P4 being of similar size (not smaller) than M1, and the P4-M1 with a quadrangular outline (not elongated mesiodistally).

REMARKS

In comparison with other Laventan litopterns, Neodolodus differs from Mesolicaphrium sanalfonense ( Cifelli & Guerrero 1997; McGrath et al. 2020a) in the absence of a connection between the protocone and metaconule, having well-developed styles on the upper molars, and the absence of a mesostyle on P3. It differs from Villarroelia totoyoi in that P3-4 are not fully molariform lacking an hypocone, the absence of a mesostyle on P3 and P4, and the presence of a hypocone on M3 ( Cifelli & Guerrero 1997).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Litopterna

Family

Didolodontidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF