Pristiphora sp.
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.62.4737 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6CEA4772-755A-464E-B641-BE82D01160E2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F7890839-5834-6A7A-3A35-618B2F7A63F4 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Pristiphora sp. |
status |
[subbifida group] |
Taxon classification Animalia Hymenoptera Tenthredinidae
† Pristiphora sp. View in CoL View at ENA [subbifida group]
Material.
Crete; 1♂, Omalos, 21.iv.2013. Swept from Acer sempervirens , which is probably a host plant, because this is the only Acer sp. occurring in Crete and all species of the Pristiphora subbifida group use Acer spp. as hosts ( Liston and Späth 2008).
Barcode data: the sequence of this specimen (DEIGISHym20661) diverges by about 4.8% from its nearest neighbour, Pristiphora tetrica (Zaddach, 1883) from Sicily (DEIGISHym10972). Divergence from two Cretan Pristiphora tetrica (see below) is approximately 5.3% and from Pristiphora schedli Liston and Späth, 2008 (Cyprus) approx. 8.6%.
Externally, the specimen differs from Cretan Pristiphora tetrica males only in the apex of the metatibia and most of metabasitarsomere being pale: Fig. 15 (largely black in Pristiphora tetrica : Fig. 19) and its slightly larger body length of 4.5 mm ( Pristiphora tetrica : 3.5-4.0 mm). However, the penis valve of the unidentified species (Fig. 16) differs substantially from Pristiphora tetrica (Fig. 17), and resembles that of Pristiphora schedli : valvispina medially thickened and not strongly upcurved (in other subbifida group species not medially thickened, but strongly upcurved), apex of paravalva at base of valvispina not strongly expanded (other species: strongly expanded). On the other hand, the coloration of the head and thorax is much darker in Pristiphora sp. than in Pristiphora schedli , while the legs of the former are paler. Despite its morphological similarity to Pristiphora schedli , the very large barcode divergence of the single Cretan specimen suggests that it probably represents a previously unrecognized species. Possibly one of the two unidentified female Pristiphora specimens mentioned by Schedl (2011) belongs here. Further material should be obtained so that its status can be evaluated.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |