Rhytiphora Audinet-Serville, 1835
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5312.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E45A10FC-CB08-4C66-B1E9-B6857C58343B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8129694 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F8183D32-0361-7F44-FF2B-829F9F29FABB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhytiphora Audinet-Serville, 1835 |
status |
|
Rhytiphora Audinet-Serville, 1835 View in CoL View at ENA
Type species Lamia rugicollis Dalman, 1817 by monotypy ( Fig. 2K View FIGURE 2 ). Both the genus and species name (Greek and Latin, respectively) refer to the rugose pronotum. A full description and list of generic synonyms can be found in Ślipiński & Escalona (2013).
Based on molecular evidence, the Australian Rhytiphora species fall into two phylogenetic clades ( Ashman et al. 2022b); characteristic morphological traits are listed below. Within these two clades, species’ relationships are not consistent with former taxonomic groupings (e.g. previously recognised genera and subgenera; Ashman et al. 2022a); therefore, we do not use any subgeneric divisions in this paper. Four species contradict their clades’ typical morphology ( Ashman et al. 2022a): Rhytiphora piligera Macleay, 1826 and R. pustulosa Pascoe, 1864 in clade 1; R. crassicollis Pascoe, 1864 and R. fulvescens Pascoe, 1863 in clade 2. Both clades have at least one New Guinean endemic species. Clade 2 also contains a species group with punctate antennal scapes (all other Rhytiphora species have smooth scapes): R. argentata Breuning, 1938 , R. browni McKeown, 1938 , R. dallasii Pascoe, 1869 , and R. macleayi Lea, 1912 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |