Micaria chrysis ( Simon, 1910 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4294.4.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:44C7191B-C912-400E-90E1-3EB88CF7271E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6045772 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F832A659-FFFA-FFEF-23CB-FE523AFAFBE2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Micaria chrysis ( Simon, 1910 ) |
status |
|
Micaria chrysis ( Simon, 1910) View in CoL
Micariolepis chrysis Simon 1910: 203 (♀).
Comments. The species was described based on a single female and lacks any illustrations; so far it is known from only one taxonomic entry. The species was transferred to Micaria from Micariolepis Simon, 1879 , due to the synonymisation of the two genera by Wunderlich (1980). Simon (1910) compared M. chrysis with M. dives ( Lucas, 1846) , a trans-Palaearctic species that clearly differs from M. beaufortia , redescribed below. In addition, these two African species differ in size, M. chrysis females being 3 mm and M. beaufortia 5.25 mm.
The type locality of this species was indicated by Simon (1910) as " Petit Namaqualand: Port Nolloth "; the country was not indicated. There are two names Namaqualand : one is Great Namaqualand in southern Namibia , and another is Little Namaqualand in north-western Northern Cape Province, South Africa . The World Spider Catalog (2017) indicates its distribution as Namibia, although Little Namaqualand and Port Nolloth are located in South Africa ( Fig. 30 View FIGURE 30 ). It seems that Roewer (1955) assigned it to the wrong country, mentioning that the species was from "SW-Afrika" (currently Namibia) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Micaria chrysis ( Simon, 1910 )
Marusik, Yuri M. & Omelko, Mikhail M. 2017 |
Micariolepis chrysis
Simon 1910: 203 |