Acnephalomyia, Londt, 2010

Londt, Jason G. H., 2010, A review of Afrotropical Acnephalum Macquart, 1838, including the reinstatement of Sporadothrix Hermann, 1907 and descriptions of two new genera (Diptera: Asilidae: Stenopogoninae), African Invertebrates 51 (2), pp. 431-431 : 458-459

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.051.0212

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ADE55AE3-E55C-46CE-865D-1101B9875869

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7913867

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FA455017-FFFF-AD67-FE37-76CD490FFDB6

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Acnephalomyia
status

 

Key to species of Acnephalomyia View in CoL View at ENA

The following key is useful only for male specimens, and, because it makes use of male genital characters, it may be necessary to excise and macerate terminalia. If this is impractical, identifications may be achieved by comparing visible structures of the hypandrium with illustrations provided in this paper.

1 Small flies with wing length (from humeral crossvein to tip) less than 3.5 mm; ♂ genitalia as in Figs 41–43 View Figs 35–43 ........................................................................ iota sp. n.

– Bigger flies with wings greater than 4 mm in length.............................................2

2 Hypandrium ( Figs 24, 25 View Figs24–34 ) in ventral view more or less triangular in shape, and not markedly constricted at midlength; medial lobe broadly rounded........................... ............................................................................ andrenoides ( Wiedemann, 1828)

– Hypandrium in ventral view not triangular in shape, markedly constricted at or before midlength; medial lobe finger­like with narrowly rounded or slightly clavate tip...........................................................................................................................3

3 Distal ends of inner lobes of gonocoxites ( Figs 45, 46 View Figs 44–51 ) broadly expanded in dorsal view.................................................................................................. leukoros sp. n.

– Distal ends of inner lobes of gonocoxites narrow with moderately rounded distal end in dorsal view..................................................................................................4

4 Epandrium well-developed, about as long as broad; distal end of outer lobe of gonocoxite fairly broad and somewhat truncate ( Figs 38–40 View Figs 35–43 ) .......... eremia sp. n.

– Epandrium reduced, shorter than broad; distal tip of outer lobe of gonocoxite fairly acutely pointed .......................................................................................................5

5 Hypandrium very long, with greatest length:greatest breadth ratio>1.5; base of hypandrium with dorsal plate­like flange dorsally ( Figs 50, 51 View Figs 44–51 ) ............................. ......................................................................................................... probolos sp. n.

– Hypandrium long, but greatest length:greatest breadth ratio <1.5; base of hypandrium without dorsal plate­like flange dorsally .....................................................6

6 Scape and pedicel usually yellowish, contrasting with dark red-brown postpedicel; male abdomen with fine silky white setae laterally; hypandrium suddenly becoming constricted at about midlength ( Figs 36, 37 View Figs 35–43 )................. dorsalis ( Macquart, 1838) View in CoL

– Antennae uniformly dark red-brown postpedicel; male abdomen with course white recumbent setae laterally; hypandrium gradually becoming constricted at about midlength ( Figs 48, 49 View Figs 44–51 )................................................. platygaster (Loew, 1858) View in CoL

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Asilidae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF