Acnephalomyia, Londt, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.051.0212 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ADE55AE3-E55C-46CE-865D-1101B9875869 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7913867 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FA455017-FFFF-AD67-FE37-76CD490FFDB6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Acnephalomyia |
status |
|
Key to species of Acnephalomyia View in CoL View at ENA
The following key is useful only for male specimens, and, because it makes use of male genital characters, it may be necessary to excise and macerate terminalia. If this is impractical, identifications may be achieved by comparing visible structures of the hypandrium with illustrations provided in this paper.
1 Small flies with wing length (from humeral crossvein to tip) less than 3.5 mm; ♂ genitalia as in Figs 41–43 View Figs 35–43 ........................................................................ iota sp. n.
– Bigger flies with wings greater than 4 mm in length.............................................2
2 Hypandrium ( Figs 24, 25 View Figs24–34 ) in ventral view more or less triangular in shape, and not markedly constricted at midlength; medial lobe broadly rounded........................... ............................................................................ andrenoides ( Wiedemann, 1828)
– Hypandrium in ventral view not triangular in shape, markedly constricted at or before midlength; medial lobe fingerlike with narrowly rounded or slightly clavate tip...........................................................................................................................3
3 Distal ends of inner lobes of gonocoxites ( Figs 45, 46 View Figs 44–51 ) broadly expanded in dorsal view.................................................................................................. leukoros sp. n.
– Distal ends of inner lobes of gonocoxites narrow with moderately rounded distal end in dorsal view..................................................................................................4
4 Epandrium well-developed, about as long as broad; distal end of outer lobe of gonocoxite fairly broad and somewhat truncate ( Figs 38–40 View Figs 35–43 ) .......... eremia sp. n.
– Epandrium reduced, shorter than broad; distal tip of outer lobe of gonocoxite fairly acutely pointed .......................................................................................................5
5 Hypandrium very long, with greatest length:greatest breadth ratio>1.5; base of hypandrium with dorsal platelike flange dorsally ( Figs 50, 51 View Figs 44–51 ) ............................. ......................................................................................................... probolos sp. n.
– Hypandrium long, but greatest length:greatest breadth ratio <1.5; base of hypandrium without dorsal platelike flange dorsally .....................................................6
6 Scape and pedicel usually yellowish, contrasting with dark red-brown postpedicel; male abdomen with fine silky white setae laterally; hypandrium suddenly becoming constricted at about midlength ( Figs 36, 37 View Figs 35–43 )................. dorsalis ( Macquart, 1838) View in CoL
– Antennae uniformly dark red-brown postpedicel; male abdomen with course white recumbent setae laterally; hypandrium gradually becoming constricted at about midlength ( Figs 48, 49 View Figs 44–51 )................................................. platygaster (Loew, 1858) View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.