Uduba platnicki, Griswold & Ubick & Ledford & Polotow, 2022

Griswold, Charles, Ubick, Darrell, Ledford, Joel & Polotow, Daniele, 2022, A Revision of the Malagasy Crack-Leg Spiders of the Genus Uduba Simon, 1880 (Araneae, Udubidae), with Description of 35 New Species from Madagascar, Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 67, pp. 1-193 : 67-70

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13158554

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:74E0D22E-9890-4FF0-80AB-8FCBBA976B2F

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/85774C75-E3E1-4402-B67D-ADE889480286

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:85774C75-E3E1-4402-B67D-ADE889480286

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Uduba platnicki
status

sp. nov.

Uduba platnicki View in CoL , new species

Figures 17A View FIGURE , 19 B View FIGURE , 28 E View FIGURE , 53 A–C View FIGURE , 76 G, H View FIGURE , 82 A, B View FIGURE , Maps 2, 13.

Uduba sp. ”, Polotow et al. (2015: 157), voucher.

Type material. Holotype male ( CASENT9006021 ) from rainforest at 700m elevation in Marojejy Reserve ,14°26ʹS, 49°45ʹE, Antsiranana Province, Madagascar, collected 10–16 November 1993 by S. Larcher, deposited in USNM . Paratype female ( CASENT9030253 ) from rainforest at 195m elevation in Mikira Forest , 15.120°S, 49.360°E, collected 10–12 December 2008 by F. Alvarez-Padilla and H. Wood, deposited in CAS GoogleMaps .

Etymology. The species epithet is a patronym in honor of Dr. Norman I. Platnick, premier spi- der taxonomist of the late 20 th and early 21 st centuries and one of the most prolific spider taxonomists in history. He was also a key theorist of cladistics and vicariance biogeography and showed us how a proper, cladistic classification of spiders revealed much of their deep history and biogeography. Modern studies of Madagascar spider taxonomy began with his visit to France in the 1980’s to study Renaud Paulian’s collection from the grand island: this led to the recognition that the mysterious genus Gallieniella Millot, 1947 ( Gallieniellidae ) was in fact one of the Gnaphosoidea, a group close to Platnick’s heart, and also led to the loan to Griswold of a truly bizarre unidentified specimen with huge male genitalia, which turned out to be the first recognized of many species of the Madagascar endemic genus Ambohima Griswold, 1990 ( Phyxelididae ). Present and future generations will be forever indebted to Norm Platnick’s mentoring and generosity, and to his prolific and pioneering research.

Remarks. The paratype female of this species was used as the Uduba voucher in the total evidence phylogeny of Polotow et al. (2015), i.e., voucher, “ Uduba sp. KM225230 KM225129 KM225078 KM225178 CAS 9030253, [HW0803], which was represented by figures on page 157: 22C, D (SEM of vulva, dorsal view).” Based on their phylogenetic results, Polotow et al. (2015: 137–139) stated that “ Uduba Simon, 1880 , Raecius Simon, 1892 , Zorodictyna Strand, 1907 and three other undescribed species from Madagascar form a well-supported clade ([their] figs 1, 6), which appears in all the analyses with different methods or weight schemes. These genera are currently placed in Zorocratidae , but do not appear closely related to the type species of the family, Zorocrates fuscus Simon, 1888 . Udubids are recovered in all the total-evidence analyses ( Figs 1– 3 View FIGURE View FIGURE View FIGURE , 8 View FIGURE ) and the clade is supported by several homoplastic synapomorphies ([their] fig. 6). Zorocrates Simon, 1888 lacks these udubid synapomorphies. Udubids also appear in almost all partitioned analyses of Bayesian inference and implied weights of concavity k = 6 ([their] fig. 8). We suggest raising this taxon to family level.” They also stated ( Polotow et al., 2015: 153) “ Udubidae is proposed as a new family including the clade 25 formed by former zorocratid genera Uduba, Raecius and Zorodictyna , plus the south Asian genus Campostichomma . These do not cluster with the zorocratid type species Zorocrates fuscus ”.

Diagnosis. Uduba platnicki belong to Group I.a, the Uduba dahli group ( Map 13 View MAP ) of Group I, the Epigynal atrium group. They are ecribellate, large but still smaller than Uduba kavanaughi , males less than 20mm, females less than 25mm total length. Males ( Figs. 53 A–C View FIGURE ) can be distinguished from those of other ecribellate Uduba spp. that have the apex of TA3 screw-shaped by having the TA2 a small, simple mound ( Fig. 28 E View FIGURE ) (in U. kavanaughi the TA2 is a small, blunt blade with a median longitudinal ridge, Fig. 28 F View FIGURE ). Females can be distinguished from those of other ecribellate Uduba spp. that have an epigynal plate with median lobe surrounded by depressed atrium by having the epigynal plate short posteriad of atrium, ML broad ( Fig. 76 H View FIGURE ) and the ML with a broad atrial side plate (AtSp) on each side, rendering the atrium as a crescent-shaped depression on each side.

Description. Male (Holotype): Total length 17.04. Markings typical of Uduba . Carapace 10.29 long, 7.29 wide, 4.00 high; clypeus 0.64 high. Eye diameters: AME 0.36, ALE 0.38, PME 0.41, PLE 0.43. Chelicerae 4.86 long; sternum 4.79 long, 3.57 wide; labium 2.39 long; palpal coxae 3.68 long. Ratios –carapace length / width = 1.40, carapace height / width = 0.55, PER / carapace width = 0.70, PER / OAL = 2.54, PER / AER = 1.30, OAL / OQL = 1.05, OQP / OQA = 1.11, clypeus height / AME =1.80, cheliceral length / clypeus height = 7.56, sternum length / width = 1.34, palpal coxa length / width = 2.64, femur I length / carapace width = 1.45, metatarsus I length / carapace width = 1.61, femur IV length / carapace width = 1.45, cymbium length / carapace width = 0.67, cymbium length / palpal patella length = 3.09, cymbium length / palpal tibia length = 2.83, cymbium length / palpal femur length = 1.17, palpal tibia length / palpal patella length = 1.09. With a colulus. Spination: palpus–femur d0-0-1, p0-0-1, r0-0-1; leg I–femur d1-1-1, p0-1-2, r0-1-0-1, tibia p0-1-1-0, v2-2-2-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus p1-1-0, v2-2-3, r1-1-0; leg II–femur d1-1-0-1, p0-1- 2, r0-1-0-1, patella p1, tibia d0-0-1-0, p0-1-1-0, v2-2-2-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus p1-1-0, v2-2-3, r1- 1-0; leg III–femur d1-1-1, p0-1-1-1, r0-1-1-1, tibia d0-0-1-0, p0-1-1-0, v2-2-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus d0-1-0, p1-1-2, v2-2-2, r1-1-2, tarsus v0-1-0; leg IV–femur d1-1-0-1, p0-0-1-1, r0-0-0-1, tibia d0-0-1-0, p0-1-1-0, v2-1-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus p1-1-2, v2-2-2, r1-1-2. Scopulae: cymbium, apicodorsal; strong beneath all tarsi and beneath metatarsi II and II, and beneath apices of metatarsi III and IV. Leg measurements: I: 10.57 + 4.00 + 10.14 + 11.71 + 5.29 = 41.71; II: 9.29 + 3.86 + 8.43 + 9.71 + 4.57 = 35.86; III: 7.57 + 3.14 + 5.14 + 8.29 + 3.71 = 27.86; IV: 10.57 + 3.29 + 9.29 + 13.57 + 5.00 = 41.71; palpus: 4.14 + 1.57 + 1.71 + NA + 4.86 = 12.29. Leg formula [1=4]23. Male palp ( Figs. 53 A–C View FIGURE ): palpal tibia 0.36 times cymbial length, RTA small, broad, triangular ( Fig. 53 C View FIGURE ), RTA length 0.30 tibia, RTA length equals width, apex slightly curved, with a sharp point, VTA length 1.60 times width, short, conical ( Fig. 53 B View FIGURE ), length 0.27 tibia width; tibia lacks stout spines; tegulum convex ( Fig. 53 C View FIGURE ), without ridge, tegulum length 1.02 times width; TA1 extends distad of tegulum apex, TA1 extends past TA3 apex by 1.22 times tegulum length; TA3 very large, screw-shaped with subapical grooves, TA3 extends apicad of TA2 by 1.14 tegulum length, TA2 a small, simple mound, hidden behind TA3 apex ( Fig. 28 E View FIGURE ); MA simple, small ( Figs. 53 A, C View FIGURE ) length (including apical processes) 0.56 times width, MA length 0.21 tegulum length, width 0.38 tegulum width, origin at 0.395 tegulum length, MA at 0.33 tegulum length from tegulum apex; conductor fan entire. Female (Paratype, CASENT9030253): Total length 22.00. Markings typical of Uduba . Carapace 12.00 long, 8.20 wide, 5.30 high; clypeus 0.90 high. Eye diameters: AME 0.42, ALE 0.44, PME 0.36, PLE 0.38. Chelicerae 6.00 long; sternum 4.50 long, 3.70 wide; labium 2.60 long; palpal coxae 3.70 long. Ratios– carapace length / width = 1.46, carapace height/ width = 0.65, PER / carapace width = 0.45, PER / OAL = 3.68, PER / AER = 1.35, OAL / OQL = 1.06, OQP / OQA = 1.10, clypeus height/ AME = 2.14, cheliceral length / clypeus height = 6.67, sternum length / width = 1.22, palpal coxa length / width = 2.06, femur I length / carapace width = 1.06, metatarsus I length / carapace width = 0.79, femur IV length / carapace width = 1.04, palpal tarsus length / carapace width = 0.57, palpal tibia length / palpal patella length = 2.14, palpal tarsus length / palpal tibia length = 1.88, palpal tarsus length / palpal femur length = 1.12, palpal tibia length / palpal patella length = 1.14. With a colulus. Spination: palpus– femur d0-0-2, tibia p1-0, tarsus d2-0, p0-1-1; leg I–femur d0-1-0-1, p0-0-1, tibia v2-2-2-2, metatarsus p0-0-1-0, v2-1-1-2-1; leg II–femur d2-0-0-2, patella p1, tibia p0-1-1-0, v2-2-2-2, metatarsus v2-2-1-0-0; leg III–femur d0-1-0-1, p0-1-1-0, r0-1-1-0, tibia d0-1-0, p0-1-1-0, v2-2-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus p1-2-2, v2-2-2, r1-1-2, tarsus v0-1-0; leg IV–femur d1-1-0-1, p0-0-1, r0-0-1, tibia p0- 1-1-0, v2-2-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus p1-2-2, v2-2-1-2, r2-2-2. Scopulae: strong ventral beneath tarsus-tibia I, tarsus, metatarsus and apex of tibia II, beneath tarsi and metatarsi III and IV. Leg measurements: I: 8.70 + 3.80 + 7.20 + 6.50 + 4.00 = 30.20; II: 7.20 + 3.50 + 6.20 + 6.00 + 3.50 = 26.40; III: 6.40 + 3.20 + 3.60 + 5.50 + 3.10 = 21.70; IV: 8.50 + 3.50 + 6.90 + 8.50 + 3.70 = 31.10; palpus: 4.20 + 2.20 + 2.50 + NA + 4.70 = 13.60. Leg formula 4123. Female genitalia: epigynal plate with median lobe surrounded by depressed atrium, atrium with shallow plate beside ML (AtSp) and forming deep sulci laterally ( Fig. 76 H View FIGURE ), epigynal plate width 1.42 times length; atrium sides weakly concave, atrium broad, width 0.81 times epigynum width, atrium width 1.81 times atrium length; epigynum length 1.58 times atrium length; atrium lateral plate width 0.81 times ML width, atrium lateral sulcus width 0.42 times ML width; atrium arises just anteriad of epigastric groove, atrium origin at 0.18 of epigynal plate length, ML apex narrow, arises just posteriad of atrium apex, median lobe broad, widest at base, median lobe length 0.94 times width, ML length 0.57 times epigynal length; lateral lobes narrow, atrium width 13.80 times LL width; copulatory openings appear to be beneath the anterior notch of the atrium. Vulva ( Figs. 76 H View FIGURE , 82 A, B View FIGURE ) with spermathecal ducts making three, loose, longitudinal curves, vulva length 0.73 times width, vulva width 5.28 times distance between fertilization ducts.

Variation. Male (N = 5): Total length = 14.80–18.00, carapace length / width = 1.28–1.48, carapace height / width = 0.54–0.70, PER / carapace width = 0.35–0.70, PER / OAL = 2.54–3.31, PER / AER = 1.30–1.57, OAL / OQL = 1.00–1.12, clypeus height / AME = 1.42–2.57, cheliceral length / clypeus height = 4.60–7.80, sternum length / width = 1.25–1.40, palpal coxa length / width = 2.64–4.25, femur I length / carapace width = 1.31–1.48, metatarsus I length / carapace width =1.34–1.65, femur IV length / carapace width = 1.35–1.50, cymbium length / carapace width = 0.63–0.67, cymbium length / palpal patella length = 2.96–3.20, cymbium length / palpal tibia length = 2.67–2.96, cymbium length / palpal femur length = 1.08–1.23, palpal tibia length / palpal patella length =1.00–1.12. Female variation is unknown.

M aterial examined. MADAGASCAR: Antsiranana Province: Forêt d’Anabohazo , 21.6 km 247°WSW Maromandia, 14°18ʹ32ʺS, 47°54ʹ52ʺE, elev. 120m, malaise trap in tropical dry forest, 11–16 March 2001, Fisher-Griswold Arthropod Team, [BLF3336] ( CASENT9007417 , 1♂, CAS) GoogleMaps ; Marojejy Reserve , 8.4 km NNW Manantenina, 14°26ʹS, 49°45ʹE, 700m elevation, 10–16 November 1993, C. Griswold, J. Coddington, N. Scharff, S. Larcher, R. Andriamasimanana [SL.12.LDN] (Holotype, CASENT9006021 , 1♂, USNM) , R. N. de Marojejy, 10 km NW Manantenina, along tributary of Manantenina River, Camp #2, 14°26.0ʹS, 49°44.7ʹE, elev. 775m, relatively undisturbed lowland-montane rainforest, pitfall, 14–23 October 1996, S. Goodman ( CASENT9064660 , 1♂, FMNH) , R. N. de Marojejy, 8 km NW Manantenina, along tributary of Manantenina River, relatively undisturbed lowland forest, Camp #1, pitfall, 14°26.2ʹS, 49°46.5ʹE, elev. 450m, 4–13 October 1996, S. Goodman ( CASENT9064658 , 1♂, FMNH), ( CASENT9064653 , 1♂, FMNH) ; 6.5 km SSW Befingotra, Res. Anjanaharibe-Sud , 14°45ʹS, 49°30ʹE, elev. 875m, 19 October 1994, B.L. Fisher et al. ( CASENT9006020 , 1♂, CAS) . Toamasina Province: Mikira forest, 2.5 hour hike from Andaparaty , 29 km N Maroantsetra, 15.1202°S, 49.3605°E, elev. 195m, 10–12 December 2008, F. Alvarez-Padilla and H. Wood [HW0803] (paratype, CASENT9030253 , 1♀, CAS) GoogleMaps .

Natural history. The species Uduba platnicki has been collected in lowland to mid-elevation rainforest, from 195–875m elevation. The spiders are ecribellate; nothing is known of their retreats or other uses of silk.

Distribution. Uduba platnicki are known from mountain rainforest in northeastern Madagascar (Maps 2, 13).

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

CAS

California Academy of Sciences

FMNH

Field Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Udubidae

Genus

Uduba

Loc

Uduba platnicki

Griswold, Charles, Ubick, Darrell, Ledford, Joel & Polotow, Daniele 2022
2022
Loc

Uduba sp.

POLOTOW, D. & A. CARMICHAEL & C. E. GRISWOLD 2015: 157
2015
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF