Pamphilius montanus pulcher Shinohara, 1988
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5167.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4C140613-04F6-4227-B084-45851F42E039 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6915820 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FB3C87F1-F220-AC56-FF67-FB39FE21AA42 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pamphilius montanus pulcher Shinohara, 1988 |
status |
|
Pamphilius montanus pulcher Shinohara, 1988
( Figs 104 View FIGURE 104 , 105 View FIGURE 105 ) (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11405259)
Pamphilius pulcher Shinohara, 1988a: 311 ; Shinohara, 1991b: 113; Zhelochovtsev & Zinovjev, 1995: 398.
Pamphilius montanus pulcher: Shinohara, 2001: 106 , 113, 115; Shinohara, 2002b: 430; Shinohara & Lelej, 2007: 932, 940; Taeger et al., 2010: 89; Sundukov, 2017: 105; Lee et al., 2019: 10 View Cited Treatment ; Shinohara, 2019: 11; Shinohara, 2020: 14, 244.
Material examined. Sixty specimens, including the type series. Forty-three specimens are from South Korea ( Shinohara 1988b; present work). New collection data: SOUTH KOREA: Gangwon-do: 1♂ ( NSMT 30749), Mirugam (Bukdaesa), 1300m, Odaesan Mts., 26. V. 2008, A. Shinohara ( NSMT); 1♂ ( NSMT 30853), same locality, 2. VI. 2009, A. Shinohara ( NSMT). See Shinohara (1988 a, 2001) for more collection data.
Distribution. Russia (Yakutia), South Korea, Japan (Hokkaido) ( Shinohara 2001).
Host plant. Unknown.
Remarks. This is a member of the P. sylvaticus group defined by Shinohara (1985 a, 2002b). Shinohara (1988a) described this subspecies as a full species but Shinohara (2001) treated it as a subspecies of P. montanus Shinohara, 1985 .
In our molecular analysis, the maximum intrasubspecific p -distance among specimens from Korea and Hokkaido, Japan, was 1.5% in COI (n=4) and 0.2% in NaK (n=3). The minimum distance to the specimens of the nominotypical P. montanus montanus from Honshu, Japan, was 3.7% in COI and 0.1% in NaK. The nearest neighbour was P. volatilis , diverging by a minimum of 4.1% in the COI analysis, and P. alnicola , diverging by a minimum of 0.6% in the NaK analysis. In the COI tree ( Fig. 145 View FIGURE 145 ), each of P. montanus , P. m. montanus and P. m. pulcher was retrieved as monophyletic with UFBoot support of 100% and P. montanus was sister to P. alnicola with UFBoot support of 82%. In the NaK tree ( Fig. 159 View FIGURE 159 ), P. m. montanus (n=2) was retrieved as monophyletic with UFBoot support of 100%, but P. m. pulcher (n=3) was not, while all the specimens of P. montanus (n=5) formed a clade with UFBoot support of 93% and the clade consisting of P. gracilis and P. graciloides was retrieved as sister to P. montanus with very low UFBoot support of 70%.
Pamphilius montanus pulcher is probably associated with Sorbus (Rosaceae) because the larvae of the nominotypical subspecies from Honshu, Japan, are gregarious web-spinners on Sorbus commixta Hedl. (Rosaceae) ( Shinohara & Kojima 2011).
NSMT |
National Science Museum (Natural History) |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Pamphiliinae |
Tribe |
Pamphiliini |
Genus |
Pamphilius montanus pulcher Shinohara, 1988
Shinohara, Akihiko, Kramp, Katja & Taeger, Andreas 2022 |
Pamphilius montanus pulcher: Shinohara, 2001: 106
Shinohara, A. 2020: 14 |
Lee, J. - W. & Choi, J. - K. & Park, B. 2019: 10 |
Sundukov, Yu. N. 2017: 105 |
Taeger, A. & Blank, S. M. & Liston, A. D. 2010: 89 |
Shinohara, A. & Lelej, A. S. 2007: 932 |
Shinohara, A. 2002: 430 |
Shinohara, A. 2001: 106 |
Pamphilius pulcher
Zhelochovtsev, A. N. & Zinovjev, A. G. 1995: 398 |
Shinohara, A. 1991: 113 |
Shinohara, A. 1988: 311 |