Coelinius Nees, 1819
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4586.2.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:92B7BF8E-A393-416E-A3B2-4C8C239B8882 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5921149 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FC78FA7B-C32D-FFBE-D0BD-5EA8FA7B8119 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Coelinius Nees |
status |
|
Key to Brazilian species of Coelinius Nees View in CoL View at ENA
1. Notauli complete ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 7–13 ). Mandibles with four teeth ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7–13 ). Ovipositor sheath very short, not projecting beyond apex of metasoma, less than 0.2× length of T1 ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–6 , 7 View FIGURES 7–13 )........................................................... 2
- Notauli developed only anteriorly ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 14–21 ). Mandibles with five teeth ( Figs 16 View FIGURES 14–21 , 25 View FIGURES 22–27 ). Ovipositor sheath longer, more than 0.3 5× length T1 ( Figs 14 View FIGURES 14–21 , 22 View FIGURES 22–27 )................................................................................ 3
2. Frons rugose ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7–13 ). Stigma length less than 1.5× vein R1 length. Head and mesosoma mostly black ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–13 )................................................................................................. C. itamonte sp. nov.
- Frons smooth and shiny. Stigma length more than 1.5× vein R1 length. Head and mesosoma mostly brownish ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ).......................................................................................... C. canastra sp. nov.
3. Mesosoma length more than 2.0× its height ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–27 ). Metapleuron densely setose ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–27 ). Mandible length 2.0× its apical width.................................................................................... C. lux sp. nov.
- Mesosoma length 1.57–1.80× its height ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 14–21 ). Metapleuron not as densely setose ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 14–21 ). Mandible length less than 2.0× its apical width.......................................................................... .. C. kali sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |