<rdf:RDF xmlns:dwc="http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/" xmlns:cnt="http://www.w3.org/2011/content#" xmlns:spm="http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SpeciesProfileModel" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:sdo="http://schema.org/" xmlns:trt="http://plazi.org/vocab/treatment#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:fabio="http://purl.org/spar/fabio/" xmlns:cito="http://purl.org/spar/cito/" xmlns:sdd="http://tdwg.org/sdd#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dwcFP="http://filteredpush.org/ontologies/oa/dwcFP#">
    <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03855E62FFC9FFA57E8237B5FD2A95E6">
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://plazi.org/vocab/treatment#Treatment"/>
        <trt:definesTaxonConcept rdf:resource="http://taxon-concept.plazi.org/id/03855E62FFC9FFA57E8237B5FD2A95E6"/>
        <trt:publishedIn rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.180576"/>
        <spm:hasInformation rdf:resource="http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03855E62FFC9FFA57E8237B5FD2A95E6#section_1"/>
        <fabio:hasPart rdf:resource="https://zenodo.org/record/180582/files/figure.png"/>
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.180576">
        <dc:title>Molecular and morphological evaluation of the aphid genus Hyalopterus Koch (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae), with a description of a new species</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Lozier, Jeffrey D.</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Foottit, Robert G.</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Miller, Gary L.</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Mills, Nicholas J.</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Roderick, George K.</dc:creator>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="fabio:JournalArticle"/>
        <bibo:journal>Zootaxa</bibo:journal>
        <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
        <bibo:volume>1688</bibo:volume>
        <bibo:pageStart>1</bibo:pageStart>
        <bibo:pageEnd>19</bibo:pageEnd>
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://taxon-concept.plazi.org/id/03855E62FFC9FFA57E8237B5FD2A95E6">
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://filteredpush.org/ontologies/oa/dwcFP#Taxon"/>
        <dwc:authority>Miller, Lozier</dwc:authority>
        <dwc:authorityName>Miller, Lozier</dwc:authorityName>
        <dwc:box>[151,616,1772,1798]</dwc:box>
        <dwc:class>Insecta</dwc:class>
        <dwc:family>Aphididae</dwc:family>
        <dwc:genus>Hyalopterus</dwc:genus>
        <dwc:kingdom>Animalia</dwc:kingdom>
        <dwc:order>Aphidomorpha</dwc:order>
        <dwc:pageId>10</dwc:pageId>
        <dwc:pageNumber>11</dwc:pageNumber>
        <dwc:phylum>Arthropoda</dwc:phylum>
        <dwc:rank>species</dwc:rank>
        <dwc:species>persikonus</dwc:species>
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03855E62FFC9FFA57E8237B5FD2A95E6#section_1">
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="spm:InfoItem"/>
        <spm:hasContent> Recognition characters. Apterous vivipara (Fig 6.1): Body length 1.89–2.85 (2.38); width through eyes, 0.32– 0.48 (0.44). Head (Fig. 6.2) weakly sclerotized, smooth; dorsal head and frons setae filiform; longest frons seta (fs) nearly as long as width of antennal segment II; distance of the bases median dorsal head setae (mdhs) usually less than their lengths (Fig. 6.3B); antennal tubercle weakly to moderately developed. Antenna 6-segmented, shorter than body without secondary sensoria, pale with segment VI darker and occasionally apex of segment V, setae on segment III 0.01–0.03 (0.02) long, more than half width of segment; segment III 0.30– 0.46 (0.39) long; IV 0.21–0.40 (0.28) long; V 0.18–0.28 (0.24) long; base of VI 0.09–0.16 (0.12) long; terminal process, 0.32–0.44 (0.38) long. Rostrum extending to metacoxae, bluntly rounded apically; ultimate rostral article (Fig. 6.4) 0.07–0.11 (0.09) long, 0.06–0.09 (0.08) wide at base, with a pair of accessory setae. Hindfemur 0.42–0.70 (0.59) long; hind tibia 0.84–1.23 (1.00) long; hind tarsus II 0.15–0.21 (0.17) long; basitarsi with 3 ventral setae on pro- and mesobasitarsi and 2 on metabasitarsi; Apex of tibia and tarsi darker than rest of leg. Abdomen without pigment, with faint fine reticulation and marginal tubercles on segments I–VI; abdominal setae pointed, longest seta on abdominal segment VIII 0.03–0.08 (0.06); anal plate entire, genital plate (Fig. 6.5) with several anterior and median setae and posterior row of setae. Siphunculus (Fig. 6.6) small, 0.07–0.14 (0.11) long, shape variable, ranging from cylindrical with slight tapering to slightly swollen on apical half, weakly scabrous, apically dark with paler base, apical flange absent. Cauda (Fig. 6.7) 0.14– 0.26 (0.20) long, elongate, with 3–4 pairs of lateral setae and a subapical seta.   TABLE 5.Contributions of 16 morphological variables to the first two principal components calculated from 49 specimens of  Hyalopterus(see also Figure 3). Contributions of 16 morphological variables to the first two canonical discriminate axes calculated using 50 specimens of  Hyalopterus(see also Figure 4).    Principal components analysis Canonical discriminant analysis  Prin1 Prin2 Can1 Can2  BL 0.2455 -0.0804 -0.1416 -0.0592  A3L 0.3053 -0.2660 -1.4209 0.5329  A4L 0.2659 -0.0666 -0.1305 -0.5616  A5L 0.3394 0.0982 0.4112 0.0749  A6BL 0.2735 0.0075 0.1142 0.8568  A2L 0.2599 0.2607 0.5167 0.1318  A3SL 0.0460 0.0238 0.4091 0.0547  HW 0.2334 0.2348 -0.2333 0.1710  URW 0.0222 0.5495 0.5071 0.0359  URL 0.1796 -0.2977 -0.8097 0.0910  F3L 0.3507 0.0766 0.7402 -1.2791  T3L 0.3406 -0.1240 -0.8455 0.3514  DT3L 0.2979 0.1138 0.1746 0.2968  SL 0.2335 -0.1978 -0.1611 -0.0070  CL 0.1667 0.4527 0.9656 1.1911  AT8SL -0.1376 0.3409 -0.3556 -0.8547 Embryo: Antenna 5-segmented; setae pointed; disc with 2 pair of anterior and 2 pair of posterior setae; pronotum with 1 anterior, 1 posterior lateral, and 1 posterior submedian seta on each side; abdominal segments each with 4 setae medially and a dorsolateral seta on each side of I–VI; siphunculus short, poriform; basistarsi with 2 ventral setae. Etymology of specific epithet. The name  persikonus, a variant of the Greek “Persikon malum” or Persiaapple for early reference to supposed origins of the “peach,” refers to one of the primary hosts for this aphid species. Specimens examined. Holotype:  GREECE: Kala Nera, Peliou, 12-V-2004, on  Prunus persica, N. Millscoll. (apterous vivipara) USNM; with slide label stating “  Hyalopterus persikonusMiller, Lozier, and Foottit HOLOTYPE”  Paratypes:  ITALY: Squinzano, Gemini, 15-VI-2004, on  Prunus persica, N. Millscoll.(9 apterous viviparae on 9 slides) BMNH, CNCI, EMEC, USNM;  GREECE: Kala Nera, Peliou, 12-V-2004, on P. p e r s i c a, N. Mills coll. (8 apterous viviparae on 8 slides) CNCI, EMEC, USNM;  SPAIN: Benferi, Muro d’Alcoi, summer 2002, on  P. persica, N. Millscoll. (8 apterous viviparae on 8 slides) CNCI, EMEC, USNM; all slides with label stating “  Hyalopterus persikonusMiller, Lozier, and Foottit PARATYPE”.   FIGURE 5.Canonical discriminate analysis of 50 specimens of  Hyalopterusbased on the analysis of 16 morphological variables; specimens projected on to the first and second principal axes (Table 5). Country of origin for the specimens are indicated by the following symbols: Greece (), Italy (), Spain (), Republic of Georgia (). Other specimens examined.  REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA: Karsp District, Doesi, 5-IX-2005, on P. p e r - sica, S. Barjadze coll. (12 apterous viviparae and 24 immatures on 12 slides) CNCI, USNM;  IRAN: Tabriz, 8- VIII-1958, on peach, Hambleton coll. (3 apterous viviparae on 1 slide) USNM;  AFGANISTAN: Kabul, 29- V-1961, on apricot, E. R. Millet and E. J. Hambelton coll. (2 apterous viviparae, 2 alate viviparae, 2 immatures on 1 slide) USNM;  IRAQ: Baghdad, 23-III-1965, on apricot, on nectarine, A. K. Daoud coll. (8 apterous viviparae and 5 immatures on 5 slides) USNM. Comments.  Hyalopterus persikonusis very similar to  H. amygdaliand  H. pruni, morphologically. Characters useful for species separation are included within the following key. In addition, host plant association of the specimen is critical. However, the use of the key for field identification remains difficult as evidenced by the overlap of the various ranges. Single individual specimens may be problematic and it is advisable to use multiple specimens from the same collection series. However, molecular data and morphometic analyses can be applied for separating  Hyalopterusspecies.</spm:hasContent>
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://zenodo.org/record/180582/files/figure.png">
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Figure"/>
    </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

