<rdf:RDF xmlns:dwc="http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/" xmlns:cnt="http://www.w3.org/2011/content#" xmlns:spm="http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SpeciesProfileModel" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:sdo="http://schema.org/" xmlns:trt="http://plazi.org/vocab/treatment#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:fabio="http://purl.org/spar/fabio/" xmlns:cito="http://purl.org/spar/cito/" xmlns:sdd="http://tdwg.org/sdd#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dwcFP="http://filteredpush.org/ontologies/oa/dwcFP#">
    <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0390BE19FFFB303391DFFE4E2A14CACC">
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://plazi.org/vocab/treatment#Treatment"/>
        <trt:definesTaxonConcept rdf:resource="http://taxon-concept.plazi.org/id/0390BE19FFFB303391DFFE4E2A14CACC"/>
        <trt:publishedIn rdf:resource="http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFA9C661FFF2303A9148FFF72858CD0E"/>
        <spm:hasInformation rdf:resource="http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0390BE19FFFB303391DFFE4E2A14CACC#section_1"/>
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFA9C661FFF2303A9148FFF72858CD0E">
        <dc:title>3553</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Rognes, Knut</dc:creator>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="fabio:JournalArticle"/>
        <bibo:journal>Zootaxa</bibo:journal>
        <dc:date>2012</dc:date>
        <bibo:pubDate>2012-11-19</bibo:pubDate>
        <bibo:volume>3553</bibo:volume>
        <bibo:pageStart>1</bibo:pageStart>
        <bibo:pageEnd>79</bibo:pageEnd>
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://taxon-concept.plazi.org/id/0390BE19FFFB303391DFFE4E2A14CACC">
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://filteredpush.org/ontologies/oa/dwcFP#Taxon"/>
        <dwc:ID-CoL>LH68</dwc:ID-CoL>
        <dwc:box>[151,335,441,467]</dwc:box>
        <dwc:class>Insecta</dwc:class>
        <dwc:family>Calliphoridae</dwc:family>
        <dwc:genus>Bengalia</dwc:genus>
        <dwc:kingdom>Animalia</dwc:kingdom>
        <dwc:order>Diptera</dwc:order>
        <dwc:pageId>9</dwc:pageId>
        <dwc:pageNumber>10</dwc:pageNumber>
        <dwc:phylum>Arthropoda</dwc:phylum>
        <dwc:rank>species</dwc:rank>
        <dwc:species>peuhi</dwc:species>
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0390BE19FFFB303391DFFE4E2A14CACC#section_1">
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="spm:InfoItem"/>
        <spm:hasContent> Since 2009 Ihave become aware of a few other crucially important features characterising this subgroup. First, both species have 1–2 prominent pdsetae on the hind tibia, a feature first described by Malloch (1927). Secondly, they also have the anepimeron clothed by yellow setulae only, no black setulae being present. A third oversight on my part in my revision of the Oriental species of the  B. peuhispecies-group ( Rognes 2009) concerns the species  B. unicolorSéguy, known only from the holotypefrom Pakistan. I had overlooked the presence in the holotypeof 2 pdsetae in the proximal half of the right hind tibia and 1 pdseta in that position on the left hind tibia. Interestingly, both pdsetae on the right hind tibia are clearly visible in fig. 208 (p. 66) of my revision, the lower one between the two strong avsetae and the upper one above the uppermost avseta. For this reason it is clear that  B. unicoloralso belongs in the  B. peuhisubgroup of the  Bengalia peuhispecies-group. This classification finds additional support in the structure of the distiphallus, which shares many of its unique features with the one of  B. peuhiand  B. minor. Thus, the  B. peuhisubgroup has members in both the Oriental (  B. unicolor) and the Afrotropical Regions (  B. minor,  B. peuhi). Character states shared between the members of this subgroup are as follows: (1) parafacial with no dark spot in upper part; (2) frons yellow, frontal vitta with numerous conspicuous setulae; (3) lunula bare in  B. peuhi, bare or setose in  B. minorand  B. unicolor( Rognes 2009); (4) anepimeron with yellow setulae only; (5) ia 0+1 (  lepineyiHT), usually 0+2; (6) small stout setae ventrally in proximal half of fore tibia, except in  minorwhere they may be absent; (7) hind tibia with 1–2 pdsetae at proximal third; (8) all tibiae with fringes distally; (9) a conspicuous and striking row of stout short setae on (almost along) the whole pvsurface of mid femur as a continuation medially of the distal pvctenidium, longest setae much shorter than femoral diameter (at most 0.5x); (10) ST5 flap rectangular, short (half as long as wide) in  B. minor, small irregularities (nicks) in its hind edge in  B. peuhi; upturned and drawn-out posterolateral corners in  B. unicolor; (11) process of the bacilliform sclerite a strong but narrow upturned hook; (12) distal margin of upper lip weakly convex in dorsal view; (13) upper lip almost flat as seen from front (apical view), not concave below; (14) presence of two diverging lines of sclerotisation on upper lip, reflecting presence of vertical supporting structures below it, latter is triangular in lateral view of distiphallus; (15) long and narrow antlers, in  unicolordirected anterodorsally; (16) no basal tooth on antler; (17) a varying number of sometimes extremely small tines on the tip of the antler, sometimes larger and less difficult to make out (e.g. Fig. 32); (18) dorsolateral wing of distiphallus in front view varying from very upright (  B. unicolor), to forming a right angle with each other; a horizontally directed lateral part visible in  B. minorin dorsal and ventral views; (19) very small lateral finger, with reduced number of denticles; (20) converging internal hypophallic lobes; (21) ventral finger rounded in lateral view.</spm:hasContent>
    </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

