Sarinda glabra Franganillo, 1930: 37 Galiano, 1965: 280 Sarinda glabra Peckhamia Peckhamia Sarinda Sarinda Peckhamia Peckhamia Sarinda Peckhamia Sarinda Peckhamia Sarinda Sarinda New species of Peckhamia Simon, 1900 (Salticidae: Dendryphantini: Synagelina) from the Greater Antilles Cala-Riquelme, Franklyn Bustamante, Abel A. Crews, Sarah C. Cutler, Bruce Zootaxa 2020 2020-12-30 4899 1 141 160 (Franganillo, 1930) Cala-Riquelme & Bustamante & Crews & Cutler 2020 Franganillo 1930 [151,619,151,178] Arachnida Salticidae Peckhamia Animalia Araneae 14 155 Arthropoda species glabra comb. nov.      Sarinda glabra Franganillo, 1930: 37;  Galiano, 1965: 280( Holotypelost, Cuba, Sierra Maestra).  Notes. Franganillo (1930)described  Sarinda glabrabased on the morphology of both males and females from Sierra Maestra, Cuba. However, we believe that this species actually corresponds to  Peckhamia.According to Galiano (1965),  Peckhamiacan be distinguished from  Sarindaby the tibial spination, which has the regular 2-2-2 ventral macrosetae in the former and is 2-2-2- 2 in  Sarinda; the chelicerae with two promarginal teeth and a bicuspid retromarginal tooth in  Peckhamia(four promarginal teeth and three retromarginal teeth, the retromarginal teeth almost equal in size in females ( Galiano 1965: fig. 10)); the male chelicerae are developed, projected anteriorly and divergent; in  Peckhamia, leg I is swollen but the tarsi are not dilated (in  Sarindathe tarsi are dilated, and the tibia are very elongated, more than 2 times the length of the patella (maybe to imitate antennae), and the sternum in  Peckhamiais oval (subtriangular in  Sarinda), the embolus is distal and articulated by hematodochae in  Peckhamia(fixed to tegulum and coiled more than two times around the tegulum in  Sarinda); and the female has the CD less developed (CD well-developed, coiled and with CD receptacle in  Sarinda).  Considering the original description ( Franganillo 1930: 37–38), we conclude that  Sarinda glabrais erroneously placed in the genus  Sarinda. Galiano (1965: 282)commented that  S. glabra Franganillo, 1930does not belong to  Sarindaaccording to the original description, but because of the poor description and because the typespecimens are lost, she did not establish any nomenclatorial change. Unfortunately, the typematerial of Franganillo (1930)is lost, and the original description is poor. However, there are traits to support the transfer considering the revision of Galiano (1965): 1) males and females of  Peckhamiahave two teeth on the retromargin of the chelicerae, the proximal one larger than the distal one (as in  P. espositoae  sp. nov.,  P. areito  sp. nov.and  P. surcaribensis  sp. nov.), while in  Sarindathis trait varies from one to three retromarginal teeth; 2) In leg I, the tarsus is not dilated (= “fusiforme”) as in  Sarinda; and 3) tibia I is a bit larger than the patella and the sternum is oval (in  Sarindatibia I is much longer than the patella and the sternum is sub-pentagonal). Even with expeditions and extensive collecting in the typelocality of  Sarinda glabra, we did not find the species. It is possible that the species described as  S. glabraby Franganillo (1930)corresponds to one of the species described in our work. However, this cannot be proven based on the description alone. Based on the aforementioned evidence, we propose  Peckhamia glabra( Franganillo, 1930)  comb. nov.as a nomen dubium.