Shafee, Rizvi & Khan 1988 : 2 E. Postmarginalis E. Postmarginalis Entedonastichus postmarginalis (Shafee, Rizvi & Khan) Hayat et al. 2005 : 10 Taxonomic notes on Entedonomphale (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) Triapitsyn, Serguei V. Boyadzhiev, Peter S. Antonov, Anton K. Zootaxa 2008 1816 61 64 Shafee, Rizvi & Khan, 1988 Shafee, Rizvi & Khan 1988 [151,848,1483,1507] Insecta Eulophidae Entedonomphale Animalia Hymenoptera 1 62 Arthropoda species postmarginalis comb. nov.     Euderomphale postmarginalis  Shafee, Rizvi & Khan 1988: 2(description, key [as  E. Postmarginalis]), 3 (illustrations, figs D and E [as  E. Postmarginalis]). Typelocality: Bullandshahr, Uttar Pradesh, India.    Entedonastichus postmarginalis(Shafee, Rizvi & Khan):  Hayat et al.2005: 10( typeinformation).    Typematerial examined. Holotypefemale [ ZDAMU] dissected on two slides, as follows. Slide 1 (head, one antenna, mesosoma and most of metasoma, and legs (with some segments missing) [under two coverslips]), labeled: 1. “Ref. No. 723 sp.n.”, 2. “ HOLOTYPE  Euderomphale postmarginalisShafee, Rizvi & Khandet. M. Hayat, 2003”; Slide 2 (one antenna, one forewing, and the ovipositor [under the same coverslip]), labeled: 1. “723 [in pencil] Ref. No 723 sp.n.”, 2. “ HOLOTYPEparts  Euderomphale postmarginalisShafee, Rizvi & Khandet. M. Hayat, 2003”.   Diagnosis.Body and appendages mostly dark brown. Toruli slightly below lover ocular line. Antenna ( Fig. 5) with scape (not counting a small radicle) 4.1 x as long as wide, a little dilated basally and medially. Pedicel longer than funicle; F1 a little smaller than F2, 1.1-1.5 x as wide as long, apparently without longitudinal sensilla; F2 1.6 x as wide as long, at least with 1 longitudinal sensillum; clava entire, 1.6-1.7 x as long as wide. Mesosoma shorter than metasoma. Midlobe of mesoscutum with 1 pair of setae; anterior margin of scutellum slightly angulate. Forewing ( Fig. 6) about 3.1 x as long as wide, with disc almost hyaline (with a slight brownish tinge throughout, perhaps a little more pronounced behind marginal and stigmal veins) and setose behind marginal and stigmal veins and beyond venation (more sparsely so behind base of marginal vein, and bare posterior of cubital row of setae); stigmal vein about as long as postmarginal vein; the longest marginal seta about 1/2 of maximal forewing width. Petiole longer than wide.   Entedonomphale postmarginalisis undoubtedly a good species. In Triapitsyn (2005),  E. postmarginaliswould key to the couplets together with the species that have a hyaline forewing (i.e.,  E. boccaccioiS. Triapitsynfrom the USA,  E. bicolorata(Ishii)from Japan, Germany, and Ukraine, and  E. eseniniS. Triapitsynfrom Madagascar).  Entedonomphale postmarginalisdiffers from all of them by the female antenna, both funicle segments of which are wider than long ( Fig. 5).   Comments.This species was described (and is still known) from a single female holotype“ex aleyrodid on  Citrussp.” ( Shafee et al. 1988). The host record seems doubtful and thus needs verification.