Trichotichnus fukuharai Habu, 1957: 76 Trichotichnus brevis Jedlička, 1958: 908 New data on carabid beetles of Trichotichnus s. str. (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of Yunnan (China) and adjacent areas, with description of six new species and two new subspecies Kataev, Boris M. Hongbin, Liang Wrase, David W. Zootaxa 2022 2022-06-30 5159 3 301 353 58LL4 Habu, 1957 Habu 1957 [151,694,438,465] Insecta Carabidae Trichotichnus true Animalia Coleoptera 8 309 Arthropoda species fukuharai  ( Figs. 8, 11–18)      Trichotichnus fukuharai Habu, 1957: 76.     Trichotichnus brevis Jedlička, 1958: 908.   Material examined.   China. SHAANXI: 1 male, Lueyangenv.,  21.VI–6.VII.2014, E. Kučeraleg. (cWR). SICHUAN:  2 males, W Sichuan, Aba Tibet Aut. Pref., Wenchuan Co., Qionglai Shan, Wolong valley,  20 kmWNW Dujiangyan,  1100 m, 31°05'N 103°26'E, brook bank,  14.VII.1999, D.W. Wraseleg. (cWR);  1 male, W Sichuan, Moxi— Luding Co.,  18.VII.1994, V. Benešleg. (cFCCH);  3 females, Moxi,  VII.1994, V. Benešleg. (cSC, cWR);  1 female, W Sichuan, Lixiancity,  VII.1994, collector unknown (cFCCH);  1 male, Tianquan, Heyuan, Qingshuiwan, at light, 30.02817°N 102.78621°E,  700 m,  10.IX.2007, H.B. Liangleg. ( IOZ);  1 male, S Sichuan, Ya'an Pref., Shimian Co., Xiaoxiang Ling, side-valley above Nanya Cunnear Caluo,  11 kmS Shimian, ca  1250 m,  7.VII.1999, D.W. Wraseleg. (cWR);  1 male, Moxienv., Hailuogou valley, Gonghevill.,  1715 m, 29°37'27"N 102°06'28"E,  17.–21.VI.2014, at light, in front of hotel, ruderals and gardens close to margin of mixed forest, J. Hájek, J. Růžička& M. Tkočleg. ( NMP).  YUNNAN: 1 male, 1 female, Gongshan Co.,  10–20.V.2001, Ba Weidongleg. ( IOZ);  1 male, NW Lijiang, W Yangtze, Luohe Riv.,  2.4 kmSW Kenacun, Digong, 27°33′39′′N 99°19′22′′E,  2190 m,  06.VI.2018, I. Belousov& I. Kabakleg. (cB&K);  2 males, Weibaoshan Mts, W-slope, WGS 84: 25°11′N 100°24′E,  2000–2800 m,  23.VI.2004, R. & H. Fouqueleg. (cWR, ZIN);  1 male, 2 females, Kunming City, Guandu District, Heilongtan, Kunming Institute of Botany, Botanicalgarden,  1945 m, 25.14035°N 102.74107°E,  16–17.IX.2002, Stop#DHK-2002-019, D.H. Kavanaugh, P.E. Marekleg. ( IOZ, CAS).  Re-description( 5 malesand 5 femalesmeasured). Body length 9.7–11.3 mm. Habitus as in Fig. 8. Body dorsally black, very shiny, elytra notably iridescent; ventral side blackish brown. Labrum, base of mandibles, palpi, antennae and legs brownish yellow to reddish brown; femora not darker than tibiae; tarsi and apex of tibiae occasionally slightly infuscate. Head with large and convex eyes (HWmax/PWmax 0.66–0.70, HWmin/PWmax 0.51–0.54, HWmax/HWmin 1.27–1.34). Genae narrower than antennomere 2 basally. Fronto-ocular furrows fine, impressed at clypeus, obscurely reaching supraorbital furrows. Left mandible sharply bent in the apical fifth, subtruncate at tip. Mentumand submentum not fused. Ligular sclerite markedly widened apically. Dorsal microsculpture consisting of very fine, more or less isodiametric meshes. Pronotum (PWmax/PL 1.47–1.55) widest slightly before the middle (PWmax/PWmin 1.15–1.20), more strongly narrowed apically than basally, with base markedly longer than apex and with sides roundly or almost straightly converging in basal half. Apical margin moderately deeply emarginate, in most specimens bordered only laterally; basal margin almost straight, completely bordered. Lateral bead complete, not widened basally. Basal angle obtusangular, sharp at apex, with very small obtuse denticle protruding laterally. Disc moderately convex, flattened laterobasally; basal foveae shallow and wide. Surface very densely and distinctly punctate laterobasally and along sides, with finer punctures at base medially, and occasionally at apical margin mostly laterally. Microsculpture strongly obliterated, not forming distinct meshes. Elytra (EL/EW 1.46–1.56; EL/PL 2.77–2.93; EW/PWmax 1.21–1.29) convex, elongate oval, widest in the apical third; sides slightly concave before the middle; humeri angularly rounded, with very small acute denticle; preapical sinuation distinct but shallow; sutural angle acutangular, sharp or blunted at tip. Internal humeral angle very obtuse. Striae impressed along entire length. Intervals convex, very slightly on disc and markedly apically. Parascutellar (abbreviate) striole long, with a small setigerous pore at base. Interval 3 with a small discal setigerous pore adjacent to stria 2 before the apical quarter. Marginal umbilicate series more or less continuous or interrupted at the middle. Microsculpture strongly obliterated, consisting of indistinct transverse lines.   FIGURES 8–10.  Trichotichnusspp., habitus. 8,  T. fukuharai Habu, 1957(Yunnan); 9,  T. angustitarsis  sp. n.(S Tengchong); 10,  T. subrobustus  sp. n.(holotype). Scale bar = 1.0 mm.   FIGURES 11–16.  Trichotichnus fukuharai Habu, 1957(11, 15 & 16, Yunnan; 12–14, Sichuan). 11 & 12, terminal lamella of aedeagus; 13, 14, median lobe of aedeagus; 15, gonocoxite; 16, laterotergite, gonosubcoxite, and gonocoxite. Dorsal (11, 12 & 14), lateral (13 & 15) and ventral (16) views. Scale bars: A = 0.5 mm (11, 12, 15 & 16), B = 1.0 mm (13 & 14).   FIGURE 17.  Trichotichnus fukuharai Habu, 1957, distribution in China. Wings fully developed. Prosternum with very fine short setae. Metepisternum markedly longer than wide, strongly narrowed posteriorly. Legs relatively short. Protibia without longitudinal sulcus on dorsal side, in both sexes with three stout, similar sized preapical spines on outer margin ( Fig. 18). Tarsi glabrous dorsally, pro- and mesotarsomeres 1–4 inboth sexes with comparatively sparse ventro-lateral setae. Metatarsus slender, about as long as HWmax, with tarsomere 1 elongate, about as long as tarsomeres 2 and 3 combined. In male, protarsomeres 2 and 3 about as long as wide; mesotarsomere 1 elongate, almost as long as metatarsomeres 2 and 3 combined, with a pair of adhesive scales apically. Last visible abdominal sternite ( VII) in both sexes with two pairs of marginal setae and rounded at apex (in male more widely, almost subtruncate). Median lobe of aedeagus ( Figs. 11–14) rather evenly arcuate, its ventral side edged laterally in apical part and slightly depressed between margins; terminal lamella ( Figs. 11 & 12) in dorsal view comparatively short, slightly wider than long, deeply concave, with sides roundly converging to rounded apex and with a small apical capitulum protruding dorsally. Apical orifice in dorsal position, wide apically. Internal sac with a large apical spine. Female genitalia ( Figs. 15 & 16): gonocoxite comparatively wide in ventral view, about 0.6 times as long as gonosubcoxite, with relatively wide base.  Comparison.Among the described Chinese species of  Trichotichnus s. str., this species is recognizable by large and stout body. It is somewhat similar in habitus to  T. potanini( Tschitschérine, 1906), but the latter species differs in having body, on average, smaller (length about 8.0– 10.2 mm), femora in many specimens infuscate, pronotum widest more anteriorly, more strongly narrowed basally and with more prominent denticle at basal angles, metepisternum shorter, protibia of male with one stouter and two slenderer spines on outer margin preapically, median lobe with almost straight middle portion of internal margin and without spines in internal sac; in addition, terminal lamella of  T. potaniniin dorsal view is more strongly and almost straightly converging to acuter apex. Similar characters also distinguish  T. bouvieri(Tschitschérine, 1897)from  T. fukuharai, but pronotum of the former species is widest at the middle and basal angles in many specimens are narrowly rounded at apex.   Distribution( Fig. 17). This species was known from Japan(Honshu) ( Habu 1973) and China( Sichuan) ( Hua 2002). It is recorded here from Shaanxiand Yunnanfor the first time. In China,  T. fukuharaioccurs at altitudes of 700–2200 m; in the Weibaoshan Mountains ( Yunnan), it was found between 2000–2800 m.   Remarks.Both  T. fukuharaiand  T. breviswere originally described from Honshu, Japan; their synonymy was stated by Habu (1961). Although material from Japanwas not examined, we could not find any sufficient differences between the characteristics of the Chinese specimens and those in the original and subsequent descriptions ( Habu 1957, 1961, 1973; Jedlička 1958). In addition, we compared the available specimens with the photographs of the holotypeof  T. fukuharai(https://www.naro.affrc.go.jp/org/niaes/type/dbcarabidae/t_fukuharai.html) and of a male from Honshu, Japan(habitus, elytral apex and aedeagus), kindly sent us by Seiji Morita ( Tokyo). 3821894366 2014-06-21 2014-07-06 2014-06-21 E. Kucera China Lueyang 8 309 1 1 Shaanxi 3821894569 1999-07-14 D. W. Wrase China Wenchuan Co. 1100 31.083334 Aut. Pref. 1218 103.433334 Aba 8 309 2 2 Sichuan 3821894579 1994-07-18 V. Benes China Luding Co. Moxi 8 309 1 1 Sichuan 3821894556 [805,1411,752,779] 1994-07 V. Benes China Moxi 8 309 3 3 Shaanxi 3821894332 1994-07 China Lixian 8 309 1 1 Sichuan 3821894442 2007-09-10 IOZ H. B. Liang China Tianquan 700 30.02817 Qingshuiwan 1 102.78621 Heyuan 8 309 1 1 Shaanxi 3821894507 1999-07-07 D. W. Wrase China Shimian Co. 1250 Xiaoxiang Ling Ya'an Pref. 8 309 1 1 Sichuan 3821894478 2014-06-17 2014-06-21 2014-06-17 NMP J. Hajek & J. Ruzicka & M. Tkoc China Moxi 1715 29.624166 Gonghe 20 102.10777 Hailuogou valley 8 309 1 1 Shaanxi 3821894343 [417,1345,968,995] 2001-05-10 2001-05-20 2001-05-10 IOZ Ba Weidong China Gongshan Co. Gongshan Co. 8 309 2 1 1 Yunnan 3821894527 2018-06-06 I. Belousov & I. Kabak China Yangtze 2190 27.560833 Digong 20 99.32278 Luohe Riv. 8 309 1 1 Yunnan 3821894435 2004-06-23 ZIN R. & H. Fouque China 2400 25.183332 Weibaoshan Mts 1247 100.4 8 309 2 2 Yunnan 3821894374 2002-09-16 2002-09-17 2002-09-16 IOZ, CAS D. H. Kavanaugh & P. E. Marek China Kunming City 1945 25.14035 Heilongtan 1 102.74107 Guandu District 8 309 3 2 1 Yunnan