Anemonoides x lipsiensis (Beck) Peruzzi & G.Astuti

Astuti, Giovanni, Marconi, Giancarlo, Pupillo, Paolo & Peruzzi, Lorenzo, 2019, Anemonoidesxlipsiensis comb. nov. (Ranunculaceae), new for the Italian flora, Italian Botanist 7, pp. 101-105 : 104

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/italianbotanist.7.35004

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D2A34E40-A4F6-63E3-2E00-2078161A7F5D

treatment provided by

Italian Botanist by Pensoft

scientific name

Anemonoides x lipsiensis (Beck) Peruzzi & G.Astuti
status

comb. nov.

Anemonoides x lipsiensis (Beck) Peruzzi & G.Astuti   LSID comb. nov.

Anemone x lipsiensis Beck, Fl. Nieder-Österreich 1: 407. 1890 (Basionym)

= Anemone x vindobonensis Beck, Fl. Nieder-Österreich 1: 407. 1890

= Anemone x seemenii E.G.Camus, J. Bot. (Morot) 12: 101. 1898 ≡ Anemonoides x seemenii (E.G.Camus) Holub, Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 18(2): 206. 1983

- Anemone intermedia M.Winkl. ex Pritz., Linnaea 15: 652. 1842, nom. nud.

Note.

Beck von Mannagetta (1890) lists A. lipsiensis and A. vindobonensis as “6a” and “6b” respectively, “6” representing the same hybrid formula " A. nemorosa x ranunculoides " ( Beck von Mannagetta 1890: 406). This guarantees that he considered both these taxa as nothospecies (from the Preface at pag. V: “...sämmtliche Kreutzungen zweier Arten wurden unter einer Nummer vereinigt und die einzelnen Hybriden, insoweit deren Unterscheidung überhaupt möglich ist, unter den gemeinsamen Nummer mit fortlaufenden Buchstaben bezeichnet." ["...all the crosses between two species are united under the same number and the single hybrids, unless they can be differentiated, are indicated by that number followed by consecutive letters"]). Consequently, both names are legitimate (Art. H.4 of ICN, Turland et al. 2018) and of equal priority (Art. 11.5 of ICN), so that we select here A. lipsiesis as priority name.