Alysia sparsa, Zhu & Achterberg & Chen, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4500.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:54BE1878-D334-4668-BDAA-45EC75EB841A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300151 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4620AD1A-FFA3-FFF6-49A9-FE856FAF9CE4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Alysia sparsa |
status |
sp. nov. |
Alysia sparsa sp. n.
Figs 9–10
Type material. Holotype, ♀ ( ZJUH), “ [NE. China:] Hubei, Mt. Xiaowutai, Jinhekou 23.?.2005, Zhang Hongying, No. 200608958”.
Diagnosis. Body black ( Fig. 9); two basal antennomere of antenna brownish yellow; mandible and palpi yellow; third antennomere (including annellus) 1.3 × longer than fourth antennomere ( Fig. 10G View FIGURE 10 ); eye in dorsal view 1.6 × as long as temple ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ); eye in lateral view 1.1 × higher than wide ( Fig. 10K View FIGURE 10 ); frons smooth posteriorly, but rugose between antennal sockets; vertex and temple smooth ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ); face weakly rugose medially, twice wider than high, rather convex medially, with a medio-longitudinal ridge ( Fig. 10J View FIGURE 10 ); clypeus small, semi-elliptical and with some punctures ( Fig. 10J View FIGURE 10 ); precoxal sulcus narrowly crenulated and small, not reaching middle coxa and anterior edge of epicnemial area ( Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ); notauli incomplete, only present anteriorly; medioposterior depression deep and droplet-shaped, remaining far from middle of mesoscutum ( Fig. 10D View FIGURE 10 ); surface of propodeum densely reticulate-rugose, areola absent posteriorly ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ); pterostigma 5.0 × longer than its maximum width ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ); hind coxa smooth ( Fig. 10N View FIGURE 10 ); length of first tergite 1.3 × its apical width, its surface longitudinally striate and some rugae between striae, its dorsal carinae connected subposteriorly ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ); ovipositor sheath with very few setae and only apically present; convexity of upper valve of ovipositor steep basally; total visible sheath 0.3 × as long as fore wing, and nearly as long as hind tibia ( Fig. 10H View FIGURE 10 ); metasoma except first tergite dark reddish brown; legs yellowish brown, but apical part of hind tibia brown ( Fig. 9).
Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 3.5 mm, of fore wing 4.3 mm.
Head. Transverse, width of head 2.0 × its lateral length, and 1.5 × wider than mesoscutum ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ); antenna with 34 antennomere, third antennomere (including annellus) 1.3 × longer than fourth antennomere, length of third, fourth and penultimate antennomere 4.0, 4.0 and 2.2 × their width, respectively ( Fig. 10G View FIGURE 10 ); maxillary palp incomplete ( Fig. 10K View FIGURE 10 ); eye in dorsal view 1.6 × as long as temple ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ); eye in lateral view 1.1 × higher than wide ( Fig. 10K View FIGURE 10 ); frons smooth posteriorly, but rugose between antennal sockets ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ); vertex and temple smooth ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ); OOL:diameter of ocellus:POL= 13:5:6; face weakly rugose in middle, twice wider than high and with a medio-longitudinal ridge ( Fig. 10J View FIGURE 10 ); clypeus small, semi-elliptical and with some punctures; mandible enlarged apically, dorsal tooth enlarged, lobe-shaped ( Fig. 10L View FIGURE 10 ), ventral tooth medium-sized and lobe-shaped ( Fig. 10M View FIGURE 10 ), middle tooth curved and acute, with no incision between first and second tooth ( Fig. 10L View FIGURE 10 ), medial length of mandible 1.4 × its maximum width.
Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.4 × its height ( Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ); pronope absent; medio-anteriorly pronotum crenulate, remainder of pronotum smooth; epicnemial area weakly rugose; precoxal sulcus narrowly crenulated and small, not reaching middle coxa and anterior edge of epicnemial area ( Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ); pleural sulcus narrowly crenulated; episternal scrobe linear and deep ( Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ); metapleuron reticulate-rugose ventrally, remainder smooth; notauli incomplete, only present anteriorly ( Fig. 10D View FIGURE 10 ); medio-posterior depression deep and dropletshaped, remaining far from middle of mesoscutum, scutellar sulcus deep, with four small carinae, sulcus 3.8 × wider than its maximum length ( Fig. 10D View FIGURE 10 ); scutellum smooth; surface of propodeum densely reticulate-rugose, areola absent posteriorly ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ).
Wings ( Figs 10A–B View FIGURE 10 ). Pterostigma wide, 5.0 × longer than its maximum width. r:3-SR:SR1 = 1:3:13; 1-SR+M nearly straight; SR1 straight; r 0.4 × as long as width of pterostigma; cu-a postfurcal; 1-CU1:2-CU1 = 3: 20; 3-CU1 as long as CU1b; 2-SR:3-SR:r-m = 25:16:12; m-cu interstitial, converging to 1-M posteriorly; first subdiscal cell 4.0 × as long as wide; M+CU1 largely unsclerotized. Hind wing: M+CU: 1-M: 1r-m = 20:12:12; m-cu interstitial.
Legs. Hind coxa smooth, without ventro-basal tubercle ( Fig. 10N View FIGURE 10 ); length of femur and tibia of hind leg 4.3 and 10.0 × their width, respectively; hind tarsal segments missing.
Metasoma. Length of first tergite 1.3 × its apical width, its surface longitudinally striate and some rugae between striae, its dorsal carinae connected subposteriorly; dorsope distinct; ovipositor sheath with very few setae and only apically; convexity of upper valve of ovipositor steep basally; total visible sheath 0.3 × as long as fore wing, and nearly as long as hind tibia.
Colour. Blackish brown ( Fig. 9); two basal segments of antenna brownish yellow; mandible, palpi yellow; metasoma except first tergite dark reddish brown; legs (except apical part of hind tibia brown) yellowish brown; pterostigma and veins brown; wing membrane hyaline.
Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to A. nudinotum Wharton but differs by having the ovipositor sheath with very few setae (versus densely setose in A. nudinotum ); width of head twice its lateral length (versus 1.6 times); length of first tergite approx. 1.3 × its apical width (versus 1.6 times); mandible with no incision between first and second tooth (versus with small incision).
Etymology. Named “ sparsa ” because the ovipositor sheath has only a few setae: “ sparsus ” is Latin for “few, rare”.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |