Amauropelma hoffmanni, Jager, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3429.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C8488786-1129-FFA9-FF71-F91C527AF94B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Amauropelma hoffmanni |
status |
sp. nov. |
Amauropelma hoffmanni View in CoL spec. nov.
Figs 179 View FIGURE 179 , 210–226 View FIGURES 210–217 View FIGURES 218–226
Type material. Holotype male ( SMF), Laos, Luang Nam Tha Province, E Luang Nam Tha, Ban Tavan (3), N 20°58'57.6'', E 101°29'29.38'', 586 m altitude, valley with stream, leaf litter, sieving, at day, P. Jäger & S. Bayer leg. 18.XI.2009 GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 1 male ( SMF), Laos, Luang Nam Tha Province, N Luang Nam Tha, Nam Ha protected area (5), N 21°9'7.2'', E 101°19'47.9'', 848 m altitude, secondary forest, close to stream, leaf litter, sieving, P. Jäger leg. 7.III.2008 GoogleMaps . 1 female ( SMF), Laos, Luang Nam Tha Province, Nam Ha protected area, road between Luang Nam Tha and Muang Sing , N 21°9'7.2'', E 101°19'47.9'', 848 m altitude, underpass of stream, vegetation, by hand, P. Jäger & S. Bayer leg. 19.XI.2009 GoogleMaps .
Additional material examined. 1 subadult female ( SMF), with same data as for holotype (epigyne developed under cuticle) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. This species is named in honour of my diploma supervisor, Dr Jürgen Hoffmann (Cologne, Germany), for introducing me to taxonomy and systematics, scientific illustration and scientific collections; name in genitive case.
Diagnosis. Small Ctenidae (total length male 4.8–5.4, female 6.5). Males and females similar to those of A. jagelkii spec. nov. and A. annegretae spec. nov. Males can be distinguished from other Amauropelma spp. by their large tegular apophysis with a big dorsal excavation, which as a serrated distal margin ( Figs 211–212 View FIGURES 210–217 , 222 View FIGURES 218–226 ). Females may be distinguished by their very wide epigynal plate (width / length: 8.5 / 4) ( Figs 213 View FIGURES 210–217 , 226 View FIGURES 218–226 ).
Description. Male (holotype). PL 2.9, PW 2.2, AW 1.1, OL 2.5, OW 1.6. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.13, ALE 0.11, PME 0.20, PLE 0.20, AME–AME 0.06, AME–ALE 0.14, PME–PME 0.05, PME–PLE 0.18, AME–PME 0.06, ALE–PLE 0.09, clypeus AME 0.07, clypeus ALE 0.21. Palp and leg measurements: palp 3.45 (1.2, 0.55, 0.65, -, 1.05), I 8.45 (2.35, 1.15, 2.15, 1.7, 1.1), II 7.25 (2.0, 1.0, 1.8, 1.5, 0.95), III 6.95 (1.9, 0.9, 1.6, 1.65, 0.9), IV 9.65 (2.6, 1.1, 2.25, 2.5, 1.2). Leg formula 4123. Spination of palp and legs: palp 130, 000, 1110; femora I–II p002, d111, III p012, d111, r012, IV p012, d111, r002; patellae I–II 000, III–IV 001; tibiae I v22222, II p010, v22222, III p11, d111, r11, v222, IV p11, d111, r111, v222; metatarsi I–II p010, v222, III p112, d010, r112, v222, IV p112, d010, r112, v322. Chelicerae with 3 + 1 promarginal, 4 + 1(2) minute retromarginal teeth, without denticles. Retromargin of chelicerae close to fang base with 1 bristle. Tarsi and metatarsi without scopula. Claw tufts arising separately, but intermingle distally. Leg claws I with 5, II–III with 4, and IV with 5 secondary teeth.
Palp as in diagnosis ( Figs 210–212 View FIGURES 210–217 , 222 View FIGURES 218–226 ). Embolus arising in a 7.30-o’clock-position from tegulum, forming a semi-circle. Conductor arising in a 12-o’clock-position from tegulum, bending retrolaterally. Tegular apophysis situated medially on tegulum, exhibiting dorsal appendage. RTA with two short apices, both dorso-distad. Patellar apophysis indistinct.
Colour ( Figs 218–221 View FIGURES 218–226 ). Light yellowish-brown. Dorsal prosoma with eyes marked with black rings, faint longitudinal bands including radial markings, and dark margin; fovea distinct, reddish-brown. Chelicerae same colour as dorsal prosoma. Sternum, labium, gnathocoxae, ventral coxae pale yellowish-brown without pattern. Legs yellowish brown, metatarsus III–IV distinctly darker (reddish-brown) esp. in III–IV. Dorsal opisthosoma with black patches, most fused into two parallel rows. Lateral opisthosoma spotted. Ventral opisthosoma pale yellowish without pattern except for laterally and around spinnerets.
Female (paratype). PL 2.8, PW 2.15, AW 1.4, OL 3.5, OW 2.2. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.11, ALE 0.15, PME 0.22, PLE 0.21, AME–AME 0.07, AME–ALE 0.16, PME–PME 0.06, PME–PLE 0.21, AME– PME 0.05, ALE–PLE 0.10, clypeus AME 0.07, clypeus ALE 0.16. Palp and leg measurements: palp 3.15 (1.0, 0.55, 0.7, -, 0.9), I 7.65 (2.1, 1.05, 2.0, 1.6, 0.9), II 7.2 (2.0, 1.0, 1.8, 1.5, 0.9), III 6.75 (1.8, 0.9, 2.6, 1.5, 0.95), IV 9.15 (2.3, 1.1, 2.2, 2.45, 1.1). Leg formula 4123. Spination of palp and legs: palp 130, 100, 1201, 2113; femora I p002, d111, II p002(1), d111, III p011, d111, r012, IV p012(1), d111,a r001; patellae I–II 000, III–IV 001; tibiae I– II v22222, III p11, d110, r11, v222, IV p11, d111, r111, v222; metatarsi I–II v222, III p112, d010, r112, v222, IV p112, d010, r112, v322. Chelicerae with 3 + 1 promarginal, 4 + 1 retromarginal teeth, without denticles. Retromargin of chelicerae close to fang base with 1 bristle. Tarsi and metatarsi without scopula. Claw tufts arising
Copulatory organ as in diagnosis ( Figs 213–217 View FIGURES 210–217 , 226 View FIGURES 218–226 ). Epigynal plate width/length: 8.5/4; anterior width/ posterior width: 8.5/4.1; posterior part with indistinct lateral margins. Proximal part of lateral teeth posteriolaterad, their tips medio-posteriorad. Internal duct system with round spermathecae fully visible, separated from each other by half their diameter; fertilisation ducts elongately laminar, anterior-mediad.
Colour ( Figs 223–225 View FIGURES 218–226 ). As in male, except for: darker, slightly reddish-brown. Dorsal opisthosoma with transverse “bridges” between longitudinal rows of patches. Lateral and ventral opisthosoma with pattern less distinct.
Variation. Male: PL 2.65, OL 2.0.
Distribution. Known from three localities in Luang Nam Tha Province, Northern Laos ( Fig. 179 View FIGURE 179 : 4).
SMF |
Forschungsinstitut und Natur-Museum Senckenberg |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |