Amphibolips jubatus Kinsey, 1937
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5360.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:791D0E2B-4B56-4A23-9221-5E87E091B44E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10166884 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4C4B530F-FF9F-FF90-39AE-AE6EFCD46F80 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Amphibolips jubatus Kinsey, 1937 |
status |
|
Amphibolips jubatus Kinsey, 1937
Figs 18–25 View FIGURES 18–22 View FIGURES 23–25 , 71 View FIGURES 69–74
Amphibolips (niger) jubatus Kinsey, 1937: 439 View in CoL , agamic female.
Type material examined. HOLOTYPE.Asexual female “Otinapa, Dgo., 8500’, Mex Ɵ, ♀, Spr. ‘32” (white label), “ Q. fulva, Kinsey coll.” (white label). “ Amphibolips jubatus ParaHolotype ” (red label), “ Amphibolips jubatus ( Kinsey, 1937) ♀, det. JP-V, 2014” (white label), “ AMNH _ IZC 00322788 About AMNH ” . PARATYPES: 2 females deposited in the AMNH .
Additional material. Two asexual females and galls deposited in the JP-V col ( UB): one female extracted from the gall “Patos, Dgo., 15W, 8500’, Mex., 11.11.31” (white label), “ Q. eduardi Kinsey coll.” (white label), “ Amphibolips jubatus Kinsey , det. 31 ” (white label); one misidentified female in the A. elatus type material “Pedernales, 2E, Chi., 7500’, Mex Ɵ, 10.23.31, 3♀, 3.20.32” (white label), “ Q. eduardi, Kinsey coll.” (white label). “ Amphibolips elatus Paratype ” (red label), “ Amphibolips jubatus Kinsey, 1937 ♀, det. VC-P & JP-V, 2023” (white label) .
Diagnosis. Amphibolips jubatus belongs to the group of species characterized by the antenna with 14-15 flagellomeres, the lower face carinate-rugose; the mesoscutum black and uniformly carinate; the median mesoscutal line absent or inconspicuous, the central propodeal area rugose as in A. elatus and A. gumia . It differs from the mentioned species by the notauli distinct on posterior 1/3 of mesoscutum and the mesoscutellar foveae round and divided by a strong carina, while in A. elatus and A. gumia the notauli are absent and the mesoscutellar foveae are transverse and divided by an elevated triangle.
Re-description.
Asexual female ( Figs 18–25 View FIGURES 18–22 View FIGURES 23–25 ). Head, mesosoma black; antenna of the same colour than head; metasoma chestnut brown to black; mouthparts, legs dark brown to black, with coxae always darker; fore wings smoked with an infuscate area around basal margin of radial cell.
Head coarsely rugose, with sparse setae, denser on lower face and genae, rounded, transverse, 1.3× as broad as high and narrower than mesosoma in frontal view; 2.7× as broad as long in dorsal view. Gena rugose, broadened behind eye in frontal view, subequal to transverse diameter of eye in lateral view. Malar space with striae radiating from clypeus, malar sulcus absent; eye 2.6× as high as length of malar space. Internal margin of eyes parallel. POL 2.3× as long as OOL, OOL 0.9× as long as diameter of lateral ocellus and 0.9× as long as LOL, LOL equal to diameter of lateral ocelli, all ocelli ovate, of same size. Transfacial distance slightly shorter to height of eye; toruli located at mid-height eye; diameter of antennal torulus 2.3× as long as distance between them, distance between torulus and compound eye 1.2× as long as diameter of torulus; lower face rugose, with dense white setae. Clypeus rounded, nearly as broad as high, rugose, with few setae; ventrally rounded, not emarginate and without median incision; anterior tentorial pit large, rounded, distinct, epistomal sulcus distinct, clypeo-pleurostomal line well impressed. Frons rugose, less pubescent than lower face, interocellar area rugose. Vertex rugose, occiput and postocciput alutaceous; occipital carina present, postgena smooth or alutaceous, with or without setae; posterior tentorial pit large, elongated, area below impressed; occipital foramen slightly shorter or as high as height of postgenal bridge; hypostomal carina emarginate, continuing into postgenal sulci which strongly diverge toward occipital foramen, postgenal bridge anteriorly slightly broader than occipital foramen. Antenna shorter than head+mesosoma, with 15 flagellomeres, pedicel as long as broad; flagellomeres subsequently broadening towards apical end; F1 1.3x as long as scapus+pedicel and 1.3× as long as F2; F2 as long as F3; subsequent flagellomeres progressively shorter; F15 1.4× as long as F14; placodeal sensilla on F4–F15.
Mesosoma slightly longer than high, uniformly pubescent. Pronotum with irregular longitudinal striae from central to lateral part; propleuron sparsely pubescent and faintly rugose. Mesoscutum with strong irregular carinae radiating from the anterior parallel lines, slightly broader than long (greatest width measured across mesoscutum level with base of tegulae). Notaulus incomplete, distinct in posterior 1/3; anterior parallel lines distinct, elevated into a strong carina, and extending to 1/2 of mesoscutum length; parapsidal lines impressed; median mesoscutal line absent; parascutal carina broad, reaching pronotum. Mesoscutellum ovate, slightly longer than broad; disk of mesoscutellum, coarsely rugose, barely overhanging metanotum, with sparse long setae; circumscutellar carina inconspicuous. Mesoscutellar foveae big, about as broad as high, with shiny delicately rugose bottom, inconspicuously divided by dull alutaceous area, not elevated. Mesopleuron sparsely pubescent, punctured and smooth, speculum densely punctured; mesopleural triangle, with a few strong irregular striae and long white setae; dorsal and lateral axillar areas rugose, sparsely pubescent; axillula faintly rugose; subaxillular bar smooth, glabrous, triangular, narrowing posteriorly; metapleural sulcus reaching mesopleuron at 1/2, upper part of sulcus indistinct, sulcus separating a rugulose area, with sparse setae. Metascutellum glabrous, rugose, 2.0x as high as height of smooth, glabrous ventral impressed area; metanotal trough smooth, glabrous. Central propodeal area rugose, pubescent anteriorly, with delicate rugae in posterolateral part; propodeal carinae divergent and slightly bent on posterior margin; lateral propodeal area finely punctured and smooth, and densely pubescent. Nucha with strong longitudinal sulci dorsally and laterally. Tarsal claws with basal lobe.
Fore wing longer than body, smoked, with distinct dense cilia on margin, veins dark brown, radial cell open, 3.2× as long as broad; Rs not reaching wing margin, R1 distinct, not reaching wing margin, 2r angulated and shortly projected into radial cell; areolet big, triangular, closed and distinct. Rs+M visible, reaching basalis slightly below the mid-height or lower.
Metasoma shorter than head+mesosoma, slightly longer than high in lateral view; second metasomal tergum extending to 3/4 of metasoma in dorsal view, completely covered in setae laterally, glabrous and smooth dorsally, sparsely micropunctured in lateral view on anterior 2/3 and with a dense band of micropunctures on posterior 1/3; subsequent terga, densely pubescent and micropunctured. Hypopygium with or without micropunctures, prominent part of ventral spine of hypopygium 4.4× as long as broad in ventral view, with a few white setae ventrally. Body length 5.9 mm (n=1).
Gall. ( Fig. 71 View FIGURES 69–74 ) Subspherical unilocular woolly twig gall (15–30 mm in diameter). The dense pubescence is rusty brown to pale brown, and it is attached to the body of the gall, which is a strongly lignified barrel-shaped parenchyma. The larval chamber is oval, central to the gall and within the lignified parenchyma.
Host. Q. fulva Liebm. , and Q. eduardi Trel. section Lobatae .
Biology. Only the females are known. The mature gall was collected in October-November; adults probably emerged by the end of March to April ( Kinsey, 1937).
Distribution. Mexico: Durango and Chihuahua States.
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
UB |
Laboratoire de Biostratigraphie |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amphibolips jubatus Kinsey, 1937
Cuesta-Porta, Victor, Melika, George, Nicholls, James A., Stone, Graham N., Equihua-Martinez, Armando, Estrada-Venegas, Edith & Pujade-Villar, Juli 2023 |
Amphibolips (niger) jubatus Kinsey, 1937: 439
Kinsey, A. C. 1937: 439 |