Tomotilus, AND
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00705.x |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B13264-714F-FFB4-FC7F-981CCB91BBE0 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Tomotilus |
status |
|
TOMOTILUS AND View in CoL ANTARCHES
The two genera Tomotilus and Antarches in the consensus trees obtained from both the EW and SAW analyses constituted a monophyletic clade (clade S, Fig. 16 View Figure 16 ), which was the sister group of clade R ( Fig. 16 View Figure 16 ). However, these two genera differ both in external features and genital characters. Additionally, no synapomorphic character supported their monophyly. As stated by Yano (1961), the monotypic genus Tomotilus belongs to the generic group Oxyptilus . It is different from all other members of this group in the absence of rough scales at the base of tibial spurs; absence of apical or subapical scale teeth on the dorsum of the third lobe of the hind wing; not parallel margins of the lobes of hind wing; well-developed uncus; broad valva; and protruded globular sterigma of the female genitalia ( Yano, 1961). Here, it has to be mentioned that the uncus in many genera of the Oxyptilus generic group is developed. Moreover, although based on the original description, the scale tooth on the dorsum of the third lobe of hind wing was considered as absent ( Yano, 1961, 1963a), several dark scales are concentrated in the middle part and appear as a scale tooth in this area. This is a state adopted by Gielis (1993) in his phylogenetic analysis and here was also considered. Considering the absence of a scale tooth in the middle part of dorsum of the third lobe of the hind wing in Tomotilus saitoi , this gave it an unresolved position in the consensus tree obtained from the EW analysis ( Fig. 18 View Figure 18 ). Gielis (1993), based on the absence of vein R 1 in the fore wing and branching of Cu1 from the middle part of M3, showed a sister group relationship between the genus Tomotilus and the tribes Exelastini , Oxyptilini, Oidaematophorini, and Pterophorini together, but he later classified Tomotilus in Oxyptilini ( Gielis, 2003) .
Megalorhipida pseudodefectalis
Oxyptilus aguessei View in CoL was transferred to Sphenarches View in CoL by Bigot & Luquet (1991), but after describing Antarches View in CoL and A. luqueti, Gibeaux (1994) View in CoL placed O. aguessei View in CoL in the newly described genus. The genus Antarches View in CoL was recently assigned to Exelastini ( Gielis, 2003) View in CoL . Based on the present study, there is more evidence to sustain Antarches View in CoL in Oxyptilini View in CoL . This genus is close to Geina View in CoL , Paracapperia View in CoL , Procapperia View in CoL , Intercapperia View in CoL , Eucapperia View in CoL , and Capperia View in CoL based on the presence of a cone-shaped folded area at the top of the bursa copulatrix and the emergence of the ductus seminalis from the distal part of this folded area, near to the junction with the ductus bursae (characters 167 and 169). Furthermore, it is different from the members of Exelastini View in CoL in the wing shape, wing venation and patterns, as well as some genital characteristics. In both Antarches species , valvae are as large paddles and symmetrical. It seems probable that Bigot (1964) overlooked the exact shape of the valvae in A. aguessei View in CoL and considered them as asymmetrical. The two known Antarches species are very similar to each other in both external and genital characters. The differences of these two species are as follows: in A. aguessei View in CoL , the median part of the costal process is wider than both the distal and proximal parts, and the antrum plate is not so clear, whereas in A. luqueti View in CoL , the median part of the costal process is nearly as wide as the distal part and the antrum plate is relatively pronounced. Scoring the antrum plate as absent for the latter species provided the same tree. The results of this analysis revealed that Tomotilus and View in CoL Antarches View in CoL were much closer to the Oxyptilus View in CoL generic group than to Trichoptilus View in CoL .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Tomotilus
Alipanah, Helen, Gielis, Cees, Sari, Alireza, Sarafrazi, Alimorad & Manzari, Shahab 2011 |
Oxyptilini
Bigot, Gibeaux, Nel & Picard 1998 |
Antarches
Gibeaux 1994 |
A. luqueti
, Gibeaux 1994 |
Antarches
Gibeaux 1994 |
Antarches
Gibeaux 1994 |
Eucapperia
Gibeaux 1994 |
A. luqueti
, Gibeaux 1994 |
Antarches
Gibeaux 1994 |
Intercapperia
Arenberger 1988 |
Paracapperia
Bigot & Picard 1986 |
Oxyptilus aguessei
Bigot 1964 |
O. aguessei
Bigot 1964 |
A. aguessei
Bigot 1964 |
A. aguessei
Bigot 1964 |
Procapperia
Adamczewski 1951 |
Geina
Tutt 1906 |
Capperia
Tutt 1905 |