Antireicheia camerounensis, Grebennikov, Vasily V., Bulirsch, Petr & Magrini, Paolo, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.275299 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6222367 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F7FF26-CC50-FFBA-6AC0-F9CBFBB8AE4B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Antireicheia camerounensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Antireicheia camerounensis View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs. 17–22 View FIGURES 17 – 22 )
Type material. Holotype ( MNHN) male labelled "Ft. de Bafut/ Nguemba/ 17–XI –[19]69// Muséum Paris/ Cameroun / B. de Miré// Muséum/ Paris". Paratypes ( MNHN, PBC, PMC): 1 male and 1 female with the same data as HT; 1 female labelled "Bafut Nguemba/ de la Haute Nguemba)// alt. 2400 m / 31–X–1975 // lavages de terre// Mission Cameroun / C.N.R.S. RCP 318/ Octobre-Novembre 1975// Muséum/ Paris"; 1 female labelled "Bafut Nguemba/ de la Haute Nguemba)// alt. 2400 m / 31–X–1975 // lavages de terre// Mission Cameroun / C.N.R.S. RCP 318/ Octobre-Novembre 1975// Muséum/ Paris"; 1 female labelled "Ft. de Bafut/ Nguemba/ 16–VIII –[19]65// Muséum Paris/ Cameroun / B. de Miré// Muséum/ Paris"; 2 females labelled "Bafut Ngemba// alt. 2100 m / 22–X–3–XI–1975 // lavages de terre// Mission Cameroun / C.N.R.S. RCP 318/ Octobre- Novembre 1975 // Muséum/ Paris"; 1 male labelled "Bafut Nguemba/ de la Haute Nguemba)// lavages de terre// Mission Cameroun / C.N.R.S. RCP 318/ Octobre-Novembre 1975// Muséum/ Paris"; 2 males and 4 females labelled "Bafut Nguemba/ 2000 m / 24 à 31.X.1975 // lavages de terre// Mission Cameroun / C.N.R.S. RCP 318/ Octobre-Novembre 1975// Muséum/ Paris".
Description. Body rusty red-brown, legs, antennae and mouthparts rusty-yellow, fore legs slightly darker ( Fig.17 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ); length 2.30–2.45 mm (HT 2.30 mm, mean 2.35 mm, n=14). Head with ocular part of genae not protruding, eye remnant discernable as very small, whitish unfacetted field in anterolateral margin of moderately vaulted genae; genal posterior angles moderately rounded; supraantennal plates separated from genae by moderately deep and narrow furrow; vertex with fine, irregular reticulation; antennomeres 6–10 slightly wider than long; antennal length 0.66 mm (HT). Pronotum with sides in anterior part moderately rounded, slightly attenuated anteriorly; anterior angles blunt, not distinctly protruding anterad; ratio of pronotal length to width 1.01–1.06 (HT 1.06, mean 1.04); ratio of pronotal width to head width 1.46–1.56 (HT 1.55, mean 1.51). Elytra almost oval, moderately broadened, maximum width just before middle; base slightly sloping; humeri broadly rounded; lateral channel moderately broad, slightly narrowed apicad; reflexed lateral margin with 3(–4) distinct humeral teeth and with fine, just recognizable lateral denticulation especially in basal half; median stria slightly and irregularly impressed in basal two thirds, other striae consisting of rows of sparse punctures; median striae basally with moderately rough punctures, lateral ones finer, apical inclination smooth; inner intervals slightly vaulted basally, third interval without DSP; ratio of elytral length to width 1.64–1.72 (HT 1.68, mean 1.68); ratio of elytral to pronotal length 1.94–2.04 (HT 1.96, mean 2.00); ratio of elytral width to pronotal width 1.20–1.28 (HT 1.23, mean 1.23). Aedeagus with median lobe ( Figs. 18-19 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ) 0.57 mm long (HT); parameres as in Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ; urite as in Fig. 21 View FIGURES 17 – 22 . Stylomeres as in Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17 – 22 .
Differential diagnosis. Antireicheia camerounensis sp. nov. is most similar to A. deuvei sp. nov., from which it can be distinguished by its shape of the pronotum having a more rounded outline in its anterior part; by the symmetrical median lobe of the aedeagus in ventral view with its apex not turned to left ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 17 – 22 versus Fig. 13 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ) and by the generally lighter, larger body (2.30–2.45 mm versus 2.10–2.35 mm). Antireicheia camerounensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from A. demirei sp. nov. by the smaller body (2.30–2.45 mm versus 2.70–3.00 mm), by the less rounded elytral humeri and the distinctly deeper strial punctures; from A. hintelmanni sp. nov. by the ocular part of the genae not protruding, by the elytral lateral margin without several teeth, by the lack of DSP, and from both latter species by the different shape of the aedeagus ( Figs. 18– 19 View FIGURES 17 – 22 versus Figs. 2–3 View FIGURES 1 – 5 , 7–8 View FIGURES 6 – 10 ).
Etymology. Specific epithet derives from the French name of Cameroon.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Scaritinae |
Tribe |
Clivinini |
SubTribe |
Reicheiina |
Genus |