Anyphaena bifurcata, Rivera-Quiroz & Álvarez-Padilla, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.865.2097 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:845BAE1A-0E6E-484B-BE6D-17F866777B51 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7887419 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C8E927-FF95-FFB5-FDE8-FEF0FE6263DD |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Anyphaena bifurcata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Anyphaena bifurcata View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:35864EEB-BF52-411A-82FC-C5BC0AD40F7E
Figs 19–21 View Fig View Fig View Fig , 52 View Fig
Differential diagnosis
The epigynum in A. bifurcata sp. nov. is broad, the anterior edge is more than two thirds of the abdomen width, the shape triangular and projected below the epigastric furrow ( Fig. 19C View Fig ), posterior third of the epigynal plate narrower, the tip excavated with a small central atrium where the copulatory openings are located ( Figs 20E–F View Fig , 21G–H View Fig ). Similar epigyna plates and atria are found in females of A. pectorosa , but differ from those of A.bifurcata sp. nov. by the trapezoidal shape and convex posterior margin (Dondale & Render 1982: figs 328–329). Broad epigynal plates are also present in A. triangularis sp. nov. and A. urieli sp. nov., but they are anteriorly projected in both species ( Figs 10C, F View Fig , 13C, F View Fig ). Males of A. bifurcata sp. nov. are differentiated from those of related species by their ventral tegular projection base being excavated and bifurcated with a thin rectangular process ( Figs 20A–B View Fig , 21A– B View Fig , arrows), median apophysis with a small hook in ventral and retrolateral view, and cymbium base dorsally projected ( Figs 20A–D View Fig , 21A–D View Fig ). A similar cymbium and bifurcated ventral tegular projections are found in males of A. triangularis sp. nov. ( Fig. 12A View Fig (arrow)) and A. urieli sp. nov. ( Fig. 15A View Fig (arrow)), but they differ from those of A. bifurcata sp. nov. by not being excavated.
Etymology
The species epithet is taken from the Spanish word bifurcado and refers to the bifurcated ventral tegular projection diagnostic of this species.
Material examined
Holotype MEXICO • ♀; Veracruz, Calcahualco, Atotonilco , Plot I; 19.12569° N, 97.06756° W; alt. 2300 m; 15– 24 Feb. 2013; Aracnolab team leg.; oak forest fragment; LUP; CNAN-T01523 . GoogleMaps
Allotype MEXICO • ♂; same collection data as for holotype; AR_035; GenBank: ON619650 ; CNAN-T01512 .
Paratypes MEXICO • 3 ♂♂; same collection data as for holotype; CNAN-T01547 • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; CNAN-T01548 • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; CNAN-T01549 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; 21–30 Mar. 2012; CNAN-T01550 .
Additional material
MEXICO • 2 ♂♂; Veracruz, Calcahualco, Atotonilco , Plot I; 19.12569° N, 97.06756° W; alt. 2300 m; 15–24 Feb. 2013; Aracnolab team leg.; oak and tropical wet forest fragment; BERL GoogleMaps • 4 ♂♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; CRP GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; AR_063; GenBank: ON619629 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; ANYM023 GoogleMaps • 3 ♀♀, 4 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; LUP GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; AR_036; GenBank: ON619651 GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; ANYM019 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; PF; AR_037; GenBank: ON619652 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 21–30 May 2012; LUP; AR_062; GenBank: ON619628 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; 4–14 Oct. 2012; BEAT; AR_034; GenBank: ON619649 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; ANYM021 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; BERL; ANYM022 . GoogleMaps
Description
Female
Total length 7.1. Carapace yellow, pattern with darker longitudinal bands over cephalic and thoracic areas, carapace margins and clypeus yellow ( Fig. 19A, D View Fig ). Sternum surface white, intercoxal triangles present on all legs. Labium brown, white at tip, longer than wide. Endites dark yellow, rectangular, slightly broader at tip ( Fig. 19C View Fig ). Chelicerae orange, paturon dorsum with darker and diffuse line pattern ( Fig. 19B, D View Fig ), promargin with four teeth, retromargin with eight to nine denticles. Leg coloration: light yellow with scattered dark patches, pattern slightly darker at metatarsi and tarsi. Abdomen yellow, hirsute, dorsal surface covered with scattered small brown patches, pattern lighter at center, forming longitudinal band, lateral surfaces with same pattern faded ventrally, ventral surface white, tracheal spiracle at middle ( Fig. 19A–C View Fig ). Copulatory openings inside small internal edges of atrium. Copulatory ducts sclerotized, short, slightly curved, entering spermathecae via lateral surfaces below seminal receptacles. Fertilization ducts short, straight, and emerging from anterior surface of spermathecae ( Figs 20E–F View Fig , 21G–H View Fig ). Cephalothorax length 2.68, thoracic width 2.2, cephalic width 1.19. Clypeus height 0.11. Eye diameters: AME 0.07, ALE 0.15, PME 0.12, PLE 0.13. Eye interdistances: AME– AME 0.07, AME–ALE 0.06, ALE–PLE 0.1, PME–PME 0.17, PME–PLE 0.1. Femur lengths: I 2.94, II 2.68, III 2.1, IV 2.77. Leg spination: femur I d1-1-1, p0-1-2, r0-1-1. Tibia I v2-2-0, p1-1-1, r1-1-1. Metatarsus I v2-2-0, p1-1-1, r1-1-1. Femur II d1-1-1, p0-1-1, r0-1-1. Tibia II v2-2-0, p1-1-1, r1-1-1. Metatarsus II v2-2-0, p1-1-1, r1-1-1. Femur III d1-1-1, p0-1-1, r0-1-1. Tibia III v2-2-2, p0-1-1, r0-1-1. Metatarsus III v2-2-2, p1-1-2, r1-1-2. Femur IV d1-1-1, p0-0-1, r0-0-1. Tibia IV v2-2-2, p1-1-1, r1-1-1. Metatarsus IV v2-2-2, p1-1-2, r1-1-2.
Male
Total length 5.8. Cephalothorax and abdomen coloration as in female except yellow chelicerae ( Fig. 19E View Fig ). Coxa II ventral surface with broad and shallow tubercle. Coxa III tubercle roughly rectangular with spine at middle. Coxa IV spur located at retrolateral basal corner ( Figs 19F View Fig , 21E–F View Fig ). Embolus long, translucent and filiform. RTA branches short, anterior branch curved with sclerotized margin, posterior branch small, triangular in dorsal and ventral views ( Figs 20A, C–D, F View Fig 21A, C–D View Fig ). Prolateral apophysis of palpal tibia small, conical ( Figs 20B–C View Fig , 21B–C View Fig ). Pedipalp tibia longer than wide, ventral surface with median stridulatory ridges. Median tibial apophysis absent ( Figs 20C View Fig , 21A, D View Fig ). Cephalothorax length 2.68, thoracic width 2.2, cephalic width 0.9. Clypeus height 0.11. Eye diameters: AME 0.07, ALE 0.11, PME 0.13, PLE 0.13. Eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.06, AME–ALE 0.05, ALE–PLE 0.09, PME– PME 0.15, PME–PLE 0.12. Femur lengths: I 3.1, II 2.94, III 2.26, IV 2.9. Leg spination as in female except: femur II r0-2-1. Femur IV p0-1-1, r0-1-1.
Variation
Females (N =10): total length 7.2 (± 0.67), cephalothorax length 2.84 (±0.12), thoracic width 2.19 (± 0.07), cephalic width 1.2 (± 0.04), femur I 2.88 (± 0.08). Males (N =10): total length 5.79 (± 0.17), cephalothorax length 2.79 (±0.09), thoracic width 2.21 (±0.06), cephalic width 1.0 (± 0.05), femur I 3.13 (± 0.19).
Distribution
This species is found in oak forest fragments around Pico de Orizaba Volcano National Park ( Fig. 52 View Fig ).
Natural history
Most specimens were collected over vegetation by direct searching, Berlese funnels and cryptic searching on the ground vegetation.
CRP |
I.N.T.A., E.E.A. Bariloche |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |