Apiospora neogongcheniae C. L. Zhang, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/mycokeys.105.122583 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11404242 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/658C79C8-D19C-517C-BED6-D851C9B7EDF9 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Apiospora neogongcheniae C. L. Zhang |
status |
sp. nov. |
Apiospora neogongcheniae C. L. Zhang sp. nov.
Fig. 4 View Figure 4
Etymology.
Named after its phylogenetic close related to A. gongcheniae .
Type.
China, Yunnan Province: Xishuangbanna, Naban River Watershed National Nature Reserve , 21 ° 10 ' N, 99 ° 55 ' E, on the stems of unidentified Poaceae plant, Oct 2018, X. X. Feng, YNE 01248 (holotype GDMCC 3.1047, stored in a metabolically inactive state); ex-type culture YNE 01248 GoogleMaps .
Description.
Asexual morph: Hyphae hyaline, branched, septate, smooth, 1.0–2.5 μm diameter (mean = 1.5 μm, n = 30). Conidia not observed. Chlamydospores single, terminal, globose, rare. Sexual morph: Undetermined.
Culture characteristics.
On PDA, colonies flat, rounded, initially white, becoming yellowish-white, cottony, with moderate aerial mycelia, covering the 90 mm plate after 7 days at 25 ° C. On MEA, colonies white, dense aerial mycelia, forming multiple circles around the center, covering the 90 mm plate after 7 days at 25 ° C. Conidiomata were not observed.
Additional specimens examined.
China, Yunnan Province: Xishuangbanna, Naban River Watershed National Nature Reserve , 21 ° 10 ' N, 99 ° 55 ' E, on the stems of unidentified Poaceae plant, Oct 2018, X. X. Feng, YNE 001260 GoogleMaps .
Note.
Phylogenetic analyses confirmed that A. neogongcheniae formed an independent clade, exhibiting a close evolutionary relationship with A. garethjonesii , A. neogarethjonesii and A. subrosea . Based on a BLASTN search of the GenBank database, it was found that A. neogongcheniae shares high similarities with the following strains: A. garethjonesii strain HKAS 96289 (94.88 % in ITS, 100 % in LSU), strain GZCC 20-0115 (94.88 % in ITS, 99.41 % in LSU, 96.67 % in tef 1), strain SICAUCC 22-0027 (94.88 % in ITS, 100 % in LSU, 96.69 % in tub 2), strain SICAUCC 22-0028 (94.88 % in ITS, 100 % in LSU; 96.79 % in tub 2); A. subrosea strain CGMCC 3.18337 (98.35 % in ITS, 99.80 % in LSU, 94.61 % in tef 1, 94.99 % in tub 2), strain LC 7291 (91.41 % in ITS, 99.80 % in LSU, 94.38 % in tef 1, 94.99 % in tub 2); and A. neogarethjonesii strain HKAS 102408 (93.97 % in ITS, 100 % in LSU). The tef 1 and tub 2 sequence data are currently unavailable for A. neogarethjonesii to compare with A. neogongcheniae .
Due to the absence of sexual and asexual sporulation characters in A. neogongcheniae , a comparison of its culture characteristics with those of A. garethjonesii , A. neogarethjonesii and A. subrosea was conducted. On PDA, A. neogongcheniae exhibits a yellowish-white surface and reverse color, whereas A. garethjonesii displays a white surface with a reddish reverse, A. neogarethjonesii shows a white to black surface coloration, and A. subrosea presents a light pink surface with a peach-puff reverse. Phylogenetically, A. neogongcheniae strains YNE 01248 and YNE 01260 form a distinct branch with 99 % MLBP and 0.95 BIPP. Therefore, we propose A. neogongcheniae as a novel species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |