Apterodela (s. str.) kazantsevi ( Matalin, 2001 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5405.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5E7F49EC-6EBB-436B-87E5-0C089AA9AB6D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10606822 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/593387CD-1F60-500E-F88D-FABEFBE4B643 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Apterodela (s. str.) kazantsevi ( Matalin, 2001 ) |
status |
|
Apterodela (s. str.) kazantsevi ( Matalin, 2001) View in CoL
Figs 25, 26 View FIGURES 25–34 , 54, 55 View FIGURES 49–62 , 93, 98 View FIGURES 83–102 , 133, 138 View FIGURES 123–142 , 149 View FIGURES 146–152 , 201, 211 View FIGURES 193–212 , 222 View FIGURES 213–226 , 233 View FIGURES 227–236 , 239 View FIGURES 237–243 , 246 View FIGURES 244–250 , 253 View FIGURES 251–257 , 260 View FIGURES 258–264 .
Cylindera (Apterodela) kazantsevi Matalin, 2001: 385 View in CoL (Type locality— China, Jiangxi, Jinggang Shan ).
Cicindela lobipennis Bates, 1888 View in CoL : Fang & Wu 2001: 70.
Cylindera (Apterodela) kazantsevi Matalin, 2001 View in CoL : Lorenz 2005: 165; Shook & Wiesner 2006: 13; Wu & Shook 2010: 81; Wu 2011: 26.
Apterodela kazantsevi ( Matalin, 2001) View in CoL : Putchkov & Matalin 2017: 217; Wiesner 2020: 266.
Type material. Holotype, ♂ ( Figs 25, 26 View FIGURES 25–34 )— China, Jiangxi, Jinggangshan , h = 700–1000 m, 25–31.V.1998, leg. S. Kazantsev [white printed label] , HOLOTYPE, Cylindera (Apterodela) kazantsevi sp. nov., det. A.V. Matalin, 2001 [red printed label] (cSK) ; PARATYPE, 1♂ — ibid , PARATYPE, Cylindera (Apterodela) kazantsevi sp. nov., det. A.V. Matalin, 2001 [red printed label] (cSK) .
Addition material. China, Zhejiang Province: 1 ♂, 1 ♀ — China, Zhejiang, Baima Shan , 7– 17.06.2008 (cTA) ; 1 ♂ — ibid (cMH) ; 1 ♂ — ibid (cJM) ; 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ — China, SW Zhejiang, Fengyangshan, Huangmao Jian, 27 o 53’N 119 o 11’E, 12.V–5.VI.2008, leg. Jaroslav Turna GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂ — ibid, 4.V–2.VI.2009, leg. Jaroslav Turna GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀ — China, Zhejiang, Yunhe, h = 500 m, Lishui , VI.2021 (all TA) ; 4 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀ (digital images)— China, SW Zhejiang, Fengyangshan, Huangmao Jian, 27 o 53’N 119 o 11’E, 12.V–5.VI.2008, leg. Jaroslav Turna (cZS) GoogleMaps ; Jiangxi Province: 1 ♂, 1 ♀ — China, NE Jiangxi, Wufugang, 1400–1500 m, E slopes, 27 o 59’N 118 o 02’E, 29.IV–27.V.2010, leg. Jaroslav Turna (cJG) GoogleMaps ; Fujian Province: 1 ♂, 1 ♀ — China, centr. Fujian, Tianbaoyanshan, NW slopes, 1100–1200 m, 25°58’N 117°32’E, 21.V–26.VI.2011, leg. Jaroslav Turna (cJW) GoogleMaps ; Guangdong Province: 3 ♀♀ — China, NE Guangdong prov., Quifeng Shan, 900–1200 m, 23°51’N 115°21’E, 31.V–18.VI.2015, leg. J. Turna (cJW) GoogleMaps .
References. China, Zhejiang Province: 1 ♀ (digital image)— China, Zhejiang, Quzhou GoogleMaps , 28.786191N 119.064983E, 17.IV.2021, Amaël Borzée (https://guatemala.inaturalist.org/observations/74219090); 1 ♀ (digital image)— China, Zhejiang, Quzhou GoogleMaps , 28.786198N 119.064957E, 17.IV.2021, Yoonjung Yi (https://guatemala. inaturalist.org/observations/74228298); 1 ♂ (digital image)— China, Zhejiang, Lishui, Longquan Mt GoogleMaps , 28.070828N 118.80722E, 11.VII.2023 (https://guatemala.inaturalist.org/observations/172232916); Fujian Province: 1 ♂ (digital image)— China, Fujian, Nanping, Wuyishan Mt GoogleMaps , 27.755707N 117.74285E, 19.VII.2020 (https://guatemala. inaturalist.org/observations/62631135).
Differential diagnosis. Apterodela kazantsevi is easily distinguished from A. bivirgulata by the deep subapical notch ( Figs 201, 211 View FIGURES 193–212 vs. Figs 155–162, 165––179, 183–189 View FIGURES 153–172 View FIGURES 173–192 ) as well as by the shape of aedeagus ( Figs 222 View FIGURES 213–226 , 233 View FIGURES 227–236 vs. Figs 214–219 View FIGURES 213–226 , 228–231 View FIGURES 227–236 ) and internal sac ( Figs 239 View FIGURES 237–243 , 246 View FIGURES 244–250 , 253 View FIGURES 251–257 , 260 View FIGURES 258–264 vs. Figs 238 View FIGURES 237–243 , 245 View FIGURES 244–250 , 252 View FIGURES 251–257 , 259 View FIGURES 258–264 ). Apterodela kazantsevi is readily distinguished from related A. latissima sp. nov. (only by males) by the longer labrum LW/LL = 1.67–2.0 (mean = 1.89) vs. 1.97–2.38 (mean = 2.17), the narrower elytra EW/EHW = 1.44–1.69 (mean = 1.58) vs. 1.71–1.78 (mean = 1.75) with less sinuate lateral margins and longer subapical notch ( Fig. 201 View FIGURES 193–212 vs. Figs 199, 200 View FIGURES 193–212 ), the less convex body TL/BH = 4.15–4.59 (mean = 4.31) vs. 4.0–4.28 (mean = 4.14), and the shape of aedeagus ( Fig. 222 View FIGURES 213–226 vs. Fig. 223 View FIGURES 213–226 ). Apterodela kazantsevi is clearly separated from A. lobipennis by the longer labrum, especially in females LW/LL = 1.67–2.0 (mean = 1.89) vs. 1.82–2.40 (mean = 2.05) in males and 1.22–1.53 (mean = 1.31) vs. 1.50 –2.00 (mean = 1.73) in females, the narrower pronotum HW/PW = 1.39–1.6 (mean = 1.51) vs. 1.3–1.52 (mean = 1.4), the wider elytra with longer and deeper subapical notch ( Figs 201, 211 View FIGURES 193–212 vs. Figs 193–198, 203–210 View FIGURES 193–212 ), by the shape of aedeagus ( Figs 222 View FIGURES 213–226 , 233 View FIGURES 227–236 vs. Figs 220, 221 View FIGURES 213–226 , 232 View FIGURES 227–236 ) and internal sack ( Figs 239 View FIGURES 237–243 , 246 View FIGURES 244–250 , 253 View FIGURES 251–257 , 260 View FIGURES 258–264 vs. Figs 240 View FIGURES 237–243 , 247 View FIGURES 244–250 , 254 View FIGURES 251–257 , 261 View FIGURES 258–264 ). Apterodela kazantsevi is differentiated from A. alopecomma sp. nov. by the smaller size TL = 14.7–15.6 (mean = 15.2) mm vs. 15.5–16.7 (mean = 15.98) mm, flatter body TL/BH = 4.15–4.59 (mean =4.31) vs. 3.93–4.19 (mean = 4.04), wider head HW/PW = 1.39–1.6 (mean = 1.51) vs. 1.24–1.33 (mean = 1.29), glabrous scape ( Figs 54, 55 View FIGURES 49–62 vs. Figs 57, 58 View FIGURES 49–62 ), shape of labrum ( Figs 93, 98 View FIGURES 83–102 vs. Figs 95, 100 View FIGURES 83–102 ), wider elytra EL/EW = 1.57–1.74 (mean = 1.66) vs. 1.72–1.78 (mean = 1.75), and the shape of aedeagus ( Figs 222 View FIGURES 213–226 , 233 View FIGURES 227–236 vs. Figs 224 View FIGURES 213–226 , 234 View FIGURES 227–236 ) and internal sac ( Figs 239 View FIGURES 237–243 , 246 View FIGURES 244–250 , 253 View FIGURES 251–257 , 260 View FIGURES 258–264 vs. Figs 241 View FIGURES 237–243 , 248 View FIGURES 244–250 , 255 View FIGURES 251–257 , 262 View FIGURES 258–264 ).
Redescription. TL = 14.7–15.6 mm (mean = 15.2 mm, n = 4) in males, 15.2–18.1 mm (mean = 16.8 mm, n = 5) in females ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–34 ); body flat, slightly convex, in males weaker than in females—TL/BH = 4.15–4.59 (mean = 4.31, n = 4) vs. 3.53–3.84 (mean = 3.75, n = 5) ( Fig. 276 View FIGURES 273–278 ; Table 1 View TABLE 1 ).
Head metallic bronze with light bluish-green and golden-cupreous lustre on clypeus, frons and anterior edge of genae, and bright purple-cupreous reflection along sides of orbital plates; glabrous, coarsely wrinkled, with thin dense frontal furrows; orbital plates with 10–11 deep furrows; vertex widely concave, in anterior portion with wide U–shaped depression especially in females; HW/PW = 1.39–1.6 (mean = 1.51, n = 10) ( Figs 274, 275, 278 View FIGURES 273–278 ). Antennae projected posteriorly over basal third of elytra; antennomeres 1–4 metallic greenish-bronze, bronze or cupreous with golden-cupreous or greenish-gold tinge; scape besides single apical seta glabrous; antennomere 3 with three–five while antennomere 4 with two–four stout white setae except apical ones ( Figs 54, 55 View FIGURES 49–62 ). Labrum transverse, LW/LL = 1.67–2.0 (mean = 1.89, n = 5) in males, 1.22–1.53 (mean = 1.31, n = 5) in females, unidentate with long, stout apical tooth in females and short tooth in males and 4–9 submarginal setae ( Figs 93, 98 View FIGURES 83–102 ).
Pronotum metallic purple-bronze with golden or golden-cupreous tinge; from slightly longitudinal to quadrate, PW/PL = 0.81–1.0 (mean = 0.91, n = 12); wrinkled and practically flat on disc; with sparse irregular rows of white decumbent hairs along straight, converging to the base lateral margins; anterior sutures indistinct, posterior ones shallow; midline thin, metallic green with distinct golden-cupreous reflection and deep small pit basally ( Figs 133, 138 View FIGURES 123–142 ). Thoracic segments deep bronze, glabrous, coarsely rugose ( Fig. 149 View FIGURES 146–152 ). Legs metallic green with bronze-cupreous or purple-cupreous reflections.
Elytra purple-bronze with cupreous tinge, with numerous, dense diffused, small violet-green or bluish-green punctures and with humeral, subsutural, and subapical rows of large golden-green setigerous pores; flattened, EL/ EW = 1.57–1.74 (mean = 1.66, n = 12); with wide and deep subapical sinuate notch in both sexes. Shoulders narrow, sloping, EW/EHW = 1.44–1.69 (mean = 1.58, n = 7) in males, 1.66–1.86 (mean = 1.78, n = 5) in females; scutellum bronze, large; humeral group of series umbilicata consists of 5–7 large setigerous pores ( Fig. 149 View FIGURES 146–152 ); epipleura bronze, broad. White elytral pattern presented by the small, oval sub-humeral spot and short, comma-shaped, indistinctly oblique apical portion of middle band, supra-apical spot in males entirely absent, in females virtually invisible small, narrow, stripe-shaped ( Figs 201, 211 View FIGURES 193–212 ).
Abdominal ventrites glabrous, black with a light bluish or violet tinge along anterior margin.
Aedeagus medium-sized, EL/AL = 2.14–2.26 (mean = 2.2, n = 2), with short, slightly broadened apex terminating in indistinct knob and extended lateral flanks ( Figs 222 View FIGURES 213–226 , 233 View FIGURES 227–236 ). Internal sac with long straight mt, large ag, ll, and sh-ar, distinct guide for f, which placed across DA and VLL, large protruding VA and only marked both BLL and BLR ( Figs 239 View FIGURES 237–243 , 246 View FIGURES 244–250 , 253 View FIGURES 251–257 , 260 View FIGURES 258–264 ).
Distribution. CHINA: Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Fujian, Guangdong Provinces ( Fig. 280 View FIGURE 280 ).
TA |
Timescale Adventures Research and Interpretive Center |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Cicindelini |
SubTribe |
Cicindelina |
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Apterodela |
Apterodela (s. str.) kazantsevi ( Matalin, 2001 )
Matalin, Andrey V., Wiesner, Jürgen, Xiong, Xinxin & Araki, Takashi 2024 |
Apterodela kazantsevi ( Matalin, 2001 )
Wiesner, J. 2020: 266 |
Putchkov, A. V. & Matalin, A. V. 2017: 217 |
Cylindera (Apterodela) kazantsevi
Shook, G. & Wiesner, J. 2006: 13 |
Lorenz, W. 2005: 165 |
Cylindera (Apterodela) kazantsevi
Matalin, A. V. 2001: 385 |
Cicindela lobipennis
Fang, Z. - G. & Wu, H. 2001: 70 |